Forum Topics ACE ACE Legal Proceedings

Pinned straw:

Added 6 months ago

Redflex Commences Legal Proceedings Against Acusensus and CEO Alexander Jannink

Today it was announced that Redflex Traffic Systems has initiated Federal Court proceedings against Acusensus IP Pty Ltd (a subsidiary of Acusensus), Acusensus Limited, and Managing Director Alexander Jannink.

https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20250618/pdf/06kw6d5h4h2ckm.pdf

This legal action relates to alleged intellectual property infringement. Notably, Acusensus disclosed this issue in its 2022 IPO prospectus as a risk factor:

Section 4.1.6 – Intellectual Property Infringement Claim

“In December 2020, a competitor alleged that the Company and/or Mr Alexander Jannink may have infringed copyright in certain code. The competitor also alleged that Mr Jannink may have breached obligations owed to the competitor under his previous employment.

The Company engaged legal advisers, responded to the allegations, and received no further communication after March 2021. The Board considers the allegations to be without merit and did not disclose them to any customers or potential customers.”

Alexander Jannink’s Background

Before founding Acusensus in 2018, Alexander Jannink spent over a decade at Redflex Traffic Systems:

·       Joined as a Software Engineer around 2006

·       Progressed to Product Engineer and Development Team Leader

·       From 2015 to 2017, served as Head of Future Product Group, leading R&D efforts across Australia and the U.S.

About Redflex

Redflex, founded in 1997 and based in Melbourne, was a major provider of road safety and traffic enforcement systems. It was previously listed on the ASX before being acquired by U.S.-based Verra Mobility in 2021 and delisted. In 2011, it was the target of a failed $300 million takeover bid by Macquarie and Carlyle Group. The company has operated extensively in Australia and the U.S., though it has faced legal controversies in the past, including bribery investigations tied to U.S. contracts.

BkrDzn
Added 6 months ago

Over 5yrs to make a formal claim, quiet for 3yrs since they last engaged with ACE on the issue. I do note Redflex has no real competing tech still nor does its parent Vera. So why finally formally lodge now?

Will be messy and take the steam out of ACE in the near term. Unclear how this manifest risk wise on winning new deals.

12

SudMav
Added 6 months ago

Yeh the timing of it all is very peculiar. I was wondering if it’s a tactic to try get the company to bleed cash.

i echo your thoughts on new deals and I just don’t know what level of risk premium needs to be applied.

Cautiously holding for now irl and SM, although trimming my position on strawman given its 20% of my portfolio

10