Pinned straw:
Thanks for the $PXA update @Mujo. There's been a few attempts in the past to create some form of standard to increase competition in this conveyancing space, but all to no avail. Most likely due to the efforts of PEXA to be fair. To date, PEXA have made a lot of noise about being willing to be a party to a standardized platform that multiple vendors could use for the same outcome, but I doubt they have tried hard for this to happen and most likely, at least behind closed doors, have thrown up any roadblocks possible to stifle competition. I know I would in their position, so I'm not casting any aspersions here.
Interesting that the NSW Government thinks the dominant (monopolist) player should fund the standardization, that has been attempt and failed previously, by paying a non-user transferrable fee from each transaction to some form of slush fund. In other words, PEXA pays for the next iteration of the platform standardization. Although, I doubt $350,000/annum is going to go far in the IT world.
This will be an interesting watch from the sidelines, which I'm sure will take some time to play out.
Disc held IRL in small doses