Forum Topics COH COH ASX Announcements

Pinned straw:

Added a month ago

wow,

3c3662f160f6c3a43886720d482c87a52c2d5d.png

mikebrisy
Added a month ago

Weighing in on the $COH discussion, although I tend to focus a lot of my time on the medtech/healthcare sector, I've never been excited by $COH as an investment.

With such an established business, I ask myself three key questions:

  1. What has the EPS growth rate been over the long run (5-10 yrs)?
  2. What in the company strategy, incl. technology and market positioning indicates that the future might be different from the past?
  3. Where does the valuation and multiple sit with these in mind?


In the case of $COH, FY16-FY25 EPS growth was around 7%. Yes, it was hit by COVID and the supply chain aftermath, but then it was also able to benefit from the recovery period, so that FY25 is a reasonable point in time for the recovery to be complete (comparing to the similar fortunes of the other manufacturers in the healthcare space, such as $RMD).

In terms of the strategy and market positioning, while $COH has proven to have a strong moat evidenced by its remarkably durable market share, and the oligopolistic market structure (top-3 players c. 90% market share), the business has more of the characteristics of a stable /defensive nature, than necessarily a strong growth narrative.

Which brings me to the 3rd point - valuation. At end of FY25, the P/E was around 50, which I considered grossly over-valued given the answers to 1. and 2.

With a forward P/E now in the ballpark of 20x, $COH clearly now warrants a harder look. However, I don't believe it necessarily reflects compelling value. I'm more inclined to view the 9yr EPS growth rate of 7% than the figure you get from more recent years (10-11% last 3 years). And that's because the starting point of the shorter timeframe is right in the middle of aftershocks of the pandemic.

If you believe that in the future (FY26 aside) it will sustain an EPS annual growth rate of >10%, then at $100 $COH represents a great investment today. However, if you think long term its performance will revert to the mean of more like 7%, then the decision is more finely balanced. I do not have a sufficiently developed understanding of $COH or its product market to be able to discriminate between the two, so I'm not a buyer today.

Unlike the product recall incident years ago referred to by @Bear77 in that case the decision was easier. Provided you believed that the recall root cause did not reflect a systemic operational weakness in the business or a fundamental product flaw, it would be fair to have believed the market over-reacted, and a valuable entry opportunity was presented. Here it took a few weeks for the SP to bottom out, with a few "dead cat" bounces along the way. I say, this was an "easier decision", but that is with the benefit of hindsight. In medical devices product recall issues can be near-existential threats. For example, the Phillips CPAP product recall shock waves have rippled for years, and the business has still not yet recovered, and perhaps it never will.

Back to value, heading into the product recall, $COH's P/E was around 23x and, even with the short term suppression in earnings included, the P/E fell to 16-18x - not representing a "deeply distressed" price, but it certainly represented value for investor willing to take a long term view.

I'm not sure how much effort I will put into $COH, but perhaps it would be an interesting candidate to "Spotlight". There might be value on offer here, but I don't see it as a slam dunk, and that's partly because I don't full understand reasons for those elements of the downgrade that aren't attributable to Fx, and Middle East etc. Understanding customer behaviour and any trends there sound pretty important to me.

Disc: Not held

24

Karmast
Added 4 weeks ago

Very well summed up @mikebrisy

I took a good look at COH a couple of months ago. One of my sons has a Cochlear, so we know first hand how good the product is and how little any competition gets brought up with our medical teams.

My assessment was -

Very good ROE / ROC for a long time and low debt. And very healthy and stable net profit margins. Check, check, check.

KEY MOATS

  • Very strong technology and patents - the market leader way ahead of the competitors
  • Huge trapdoor moat (the tech is screwed into your skull!)
  • Very entrenched hospital / doctor / regulators approval and relationships that will take years for any new solution to break into


KEY RISKS

  • A new and better treatment option (although it would take time for that to play out)
  • Product failure / recalls
  • Reduction in reimbursements
  • Another pandemic shutting down elective surgeries


For me the EPS growth rate of the past decade has been way below what I would normally expect from a business in this position. And in turn, the multiple of recent years was way over what the growth deserved.

So, this is a very strong business historically with very good moats and fairly low existential risks, albeit over valued for quite a while. Which then leads to the likely problem...

The key issue can be summed up as a very mediocre Board and a CEO that hasn't delivered, at all, after 7 years in the job!

Remember, this Board presided over probably the worst capital raising for a good company I have ever seen during Covid, discounting it way too far, leading to about a 90% scale back. On top of that they then bought back shares when they were around $300! Just woeful capital management, from a group of "professional" Directors. They have some decent medical industry expertise amongst them but very little experience running businesses. The past Chair was very poor, also presiding over the mess at ASX as Chair there in the past. The newish Chair is way too overboarded and has been at other underperforming companies as a Director. And all of that leads me to think they hired the wrong guy for this job and still don't know it or that his plans aren't working.

As an example he recently said one of their core problems was a shortage of audiologists and that was slowing sales. Let's assume thats true (although there's a decent chance it's not), then the obvious question when you are in such a dominant position is what are you doing about it? I know what Resmed did when they had a shortage of sleep specialists...create new ways to plug that gap.

In summary, this a great business and does a lot of good in the world. There are still a huge number of people around the world whose lives would be changed with one. And if we get some Board and management upgrades in the next few years, as the pressure from the big guys now gets applied to them, there could be a lot of upside. But the question still remains if/when that happens.

I'm a buyer at these levels if we get a Chair / CEO upgrade!


19
Solvetheriddle
Added a month ago

My 2c, i was at the WAM gabfest today, my first and maybe my last......so just listened to the COH recording

COH downgrade about $135m npat, -30%, restructuring -$20m, FX -$25m, still plenty in operations, apparently upgrades were fine, so the weaknesss is in the core cochlear implants and it is huge.

mentioned US and European hospitals downgrading priorities on implants due to capacity--the obvious question is when will that end--the answer dont know, china eliminating rebates, ME war (of course), and also poor consumer sentiment reducing the pipeline, that is people dropping out.

COH mgt mentioned that thye do not believe they are losing share, so implying a market issue not a competior issue, that has to be true to consider buying the stock. idk

the thing that has always intrigued me is that COH had the most fragile consumer exposure of the aussie health stocks but traded at the highest Pe, the consistency of growth was the lowest. that means that discretioanry demand is more important. most others companies are saying the US consumer is still strong....I would need more evidence of a braoder downturn.

when i look back at my biggest misatkes over the last couple of years they crowd into buying into earnings downgrades of quality comapnies, because those issues last a lot longer and if i dont accurately pinpoin the issue or other issues emerge, and in fatc the remedy is much more complicated, it ends up a disaster.

i ahve owned COH in the past, ill let it stew for a while longer thsi time.

32
Foxlowe
Added a month ago

The real question for me is how low can it go this time around, fundamentally I think it is still a great company, down 40% in a day starts screaming a buy to me. Or are we looking at the falling knife scenario?

15

Bear77
Added a month ago

In terms of the fundamentals, I would expect that an earnings downgrade of this magnitude suggests something more than just a temporary setback or three. How could the management be that far out with previous guidance compared to today's much lower guidance. There are always reasons, but I reckon when you see this sort of downgrade and the management is blaming external factors and saying there's nothing fundamentally wrong with the company, they might not be 100% correct in that analysis.

I think we need to look forwards and ask what has changed, rather than look backwards and assume that this is just a blip and the company will return to previous growth rates and margins.

As @Strawman points out, the COH growth rate isn't that flash when you consider that the average EPS growth over the last 9 years is only ~5.8%pa, and this update today suggests it's going lower than that.

29
Raseekingalpha
Added a month ago

In the last 9 years we also had covid @Strawman , i am thinking this as a cyclical headwind, which are middle east , a reduced implantation in usa.

its competitors also reducing their guidance.

another thing is in europe there were employees striking for higher wages in hospitals i guess it as spain & germany



17

Strawman
Added a month ago

Fair point @Raseekingalpha re COVID. Although over a 9 year period I wonder just how much blame you can attribute to that. Potential recipients might have been forced to delay, but how many would cancel entirely?. The lockdowns by themselves certainly account for a big slump in earnings for a year or two, but then you think you'd see a bumper period as you work through the backlog. That's a bit simplistic perhaps, but I just think tye COVID excuse carries you only so far. (Although perhaps not if you factor in the second order macro economic consequences from COVID?)

I need to go back further and look more at a line of best fit instead of picking two arbitrary points to do the CAGR calculation. Maybe the starting point on Commsec represented a particular good year and is a poor starting point?

Still, when we are able to add in the actual FY26 profit figure, it's going to drag things down over a wider set of periods

I suppose the broader point is that like so many high quality names lately, you can see the share price fall a lot and still be left with earnings multiples that still demand a decent amount growth. At least by historical standards.

29