Pinned straw:
I watched both webinars - Neurizon's last night (for investors) and Healey's this morning (for the ALS patient community). There was clear enthusiasm at both, including from the Healey team and statisticians.
I want to develop a balanced view on what they are enthusiastic about - was it the fact they had any trial at all after several quiet years, or something about NUZ-001? It appears to be both.
Regarding enrolments, the coordinator said at the patient webinar that this is the fastest enrolment she has ever seen, not just at Healey but in fact at any trial (I assume she meant ALS trial, but it is very fast anyway).
Regarding potential efficacy of NUZ-001, the statistician noted at the patient webinar that we don't want to overpromise, but certainly there are still a couple of patients on the drug after 4 years and that gives hope, and the signals from the small phase 1 are something everyone wants to test further. And it appears safe and well tolerated.
Part of their job is to advance the science, for the benefit of future patients. The TPD-43 target of action by NUZ-001 is one of the main priorities for neurodegenerative research. So they have that incentive. However, they are also patient advocates on a direct and personal level, and they are willing to say they think they have a safe drug that might just extend life and provide clinically meaningful benefit.
I hadn't been 100% sure that the alleged enthusiasm of the Healey people was somewhat 'magnified' by Neurizon for investor consumption. It's clear now that the enthusiasm is real.
So, in my opinion, there is a 'de-risking' signal here: They're unlikely to stop for futility - because it will be fully enrolled in a few months and it's all funded. There is no way you are taking a safe and potentially beneficial drug away from these patients early when a few further months on drug might make the difference. At the least, a full trial provides data which is shared with the ALS research community.
In trials, an ambiguous safety event is an ever-present risk. They now have 60+ people on drug, and there are one or two patients who have been on it for 4 years. The independent Melbourne doctor from the original phase 1 said it was the easiest trial she's ever been involved in. I'd say the risk is very low.
One of the factors that prevents success is simply the trial being stopped early. Remove that risk and you marginally increase the odds of success.