Thanks for the reply.
Should the person's performance history add to the weighting of their valuations/straws? A person might have a contrarian view but have a lot of experience/performance to back it up (especially if theybhave taken a position in that stock)
Also, is there any way to notify a person that they have been mentioned eg. @Strawman ?
What is the etiquette for up/down voting valuations and straws?
Should I up/down for good/bad content? ie. Should I vote down a valuation with no reasoning?
Should I up/down vote for views I do/don't agree with? Should I vote down a valuation that seems wildly out of the ballpark without adequate explanation?
How do these votes currently work or how will they intend to work in the future?
Maybe there should be a way to interact with the owner of the valuation/straw (even if privately) so you can ask questions/engage with them.