Forum Topics ADT ADT Bull Case

Pinned straw:

Added a month ago

Must be expecting a huge quarter otherwise a cap raise could be on the cards.

I held this before around 40c, sold at $3 and thought great.

Funny how this is not profitable and is sitting at $1bn market cap.

aea0ff6e7e23d7edf56e7d880fbc603be962eb.png

ef3b039e4c4ff0bba0616384ec2c6314203295.png

Bear77
Added a month ago

I've always wondered the same thing about De Grey (DEG) @edgescape - not profitable, as they don't produce anything, and DEG's market cap is over $3 Billion. And their market cap has been over $2B for the past 4 years, and they've been burning cash the whole time. They are developing a large gold deposit into a mine, sure, but over $3 Billion while they are still developers ?!?

5

edgescape
Added a month ago

@Bear77

Only thing I haven't checked is future $ production per tonne. Maybe worth checking to see the economics and see how it stacks up for next quarter.

Rampups don't come smooth though. Look at Minres Onslow Iron Ore as example.

6

edgescape
Added a month ago

Apparently ADT forward estimates is expected to be a cracker so there could be a possible inflection point soon. Up nearly 10% today

Couldn't be bothered valuing the estimate in excel since this looks fully priced and not many like mining stocks now

7

Bear77
Added a month ago

Wonderful economics once they're in full production apparently @edgescape - but every now and then the market frets about how long that will take, because apparently the project is in a real pig of a location. They're producing now of course, but it's taken a while to get there, and there have been more than a few setbacks along the way.

You wouldn't think that however from the following slide from their latest presentation:

dc212ad0fcf467b21dd8fd6563501e87a4aa2b.png

Source: Slide 4 from Adriatic Metals' Vares Operation - Significant near-term cash generation - Q32024 Results Presentation [28th October 2024]

Accentuating the positives there, while ignoring the many setbacks.

The following 4 images are from a variety of Adriatic (ADT) presentations over recent years:

61175c40d97436b191f6bad2925559316dcecf.png

bb9f3940f7ac01a8a6c2d37f15f50f3ddde75b.png

Below, back in 2022:

7355d7654fd668a4c667999c901c47123b8e69.png

According to Google, in central Bosnia, winter temperatures typically range from -6.0°C to 6.2°C, (yep, that first number was MINUS 6 degrees) with an average annual snowfall of 110 cm. The central and southeastern mountainous regions of Bosnia receive the most rainfall, with maximum amounts occurring in November or December.

Winter is fast approaching over there and they're currently in the first of their wettest two months of the year.

Below, January this year:

139ca2a7d6a7a074ee28036c8e1a80a550cb35.png

Here's a link to a video they produced in January this year: https://www.adriaticmetals.com/news/project-update-january-2024/

A Mining.com article in late May talked about their recent commissioning and first sales and said that the plant should reach nameplate capacity in Q4. Despite becoming a producer, they launched a US$50 million (approximately AU$75.8 million) CR on the same day they announced first production - https://mining.com.au/adriatic-sells-first-concentrates-from-vares-silver-operation/ [28-May-2024]

The previous month (April 2024) they had terminated the contract with their mining services contractor at Rupice and took on the mining themselves - Corporate-Update-22-April-2024.PDF

Their CFO then quit in May - Management-Update-03-May-2024.PDF

I've got to go do something outside now before it gets dark - but yeah, nah, I rode ADT up in the early years, but got out once I realised just how difficult it was going to be to operate there in central Bosnia in winter. I see nothing to change my mind yet.


OK, I'm back - after midnight now but I've added a bit more.


68bde82cc2c5defe061b27d16ae2cb3c333307.png

The haul road from the Rupice Mine to the Vares Processing Plant (VPP) is 24 km of twisty mountain road (map, below left, and some of the better sections of the haul road are shown below right); might be OK in summer, but not so much in the middle of winter during heavy rain or snowstorms I would imagine.

1a295b86e7883feb245ac7b958b893e361547e.png

And then there's the bridges and tunnels along the rail line to port which Adriatic have had to bring back from the dead to be re-used again now. They had to rebuild a lot of the rail line, especially on the bridges, as it had been many years since that line had been used, and most of the sleepers and quite a bit of the track had to be replaced. So much money and time spent. Let's hope it all goes to plan from here.

fd7c1f45ceee1704919040b45208421a80007a.png

Source - last three slides: https://www.adriaticmetals.com/downloads/corporate-presentations/2024/20230325-adt-corporate-presentationv2.pdf [March 2024]

Sub-zero temperatures, heavy snowfall, plenty can still go wrong there, especially during their winter.

This one I consider high risk, not so much because of the sovereign risk (like governments moving the goalposts, or armed rebels attacking the site, which you can get in some West African countries at times) but more to do with the location and the weather and the remoteness of the site which I believe could easily be cut off and isolated in a big snowstorm. There are also a lot of things that need to go right for this thing to hit its straps and stay producing at capacity, to make that promised money, and I can think of a number of things, most of them weather-related, that could go wrong.

6

edgescape
Added a month ago

Imagine if there was no previous railway built. Would require lots more earthmoving.

They are quite lucky there was an existing rail corridor.

Couldn't help myself again so put some numbers in Excel

One thing that confused me is this slide

97c2b9482a40fcff73535c3f75cbbb2e3201bd.png

Even though Ore milled was 21000t, ADT only produced 95000 oz of silver

I tried replicating this given the silver recovery is 85% and grade is 289 g/t. Calculations below

289g/t is 6091542 g of silver per tonne

6091542 g of silver/tonne is 177699.6 oz

Apply NSR of 85% I guess is 151000 oz

So my number of 151000 oz of silver doesn't match with 95000 oz in the table.

My guess is there is a payability % since this is a polymetallic deposit and is not a pure silver concentrate.

Applying 65% payability of 151000 oz gives the 95000 oz

In conclusion, quite a big discount on the end product there.



9

Bear77
Added a month ago

Agreed @edgescape - big discount. I make it 166,470 troy ounces after applying the 85%, so even higher than your 151,000 ounces.

I used this conversion calculator: https://calculator-converter.com/grams-to-troy-ounces.htm

Which gave me: 6,091,542g = 195,847.62305 troy ounces

195,847 oz x 85% (recovery) = 166,470 oz.

Also, at the top of slide 5, they say "Record ore production of 63,100t at 289g/t Ag, 2.9g/t Au, 7.5% Zn, 5.1% Pb in Q3."

That 63,100 t ore production number seems way too high even as a calendar year-to-date number. Then on slide 7 they say they milled 21,078 t for Q3. Since slide 5 is talking about production, perhaps they meant concentrate production, not ore, in which case it's not going to be 63,100 tonnes (or tons), doesn't make much sense to me.

6

edgescape
Added a month ago

We probably need a mining engineer or metallurgist for this task

The 63100t is the mining tonnes processed.

I used the 21000t as the ore processed

Then I went to these links:

https://kuchling.com/12-rock-value-calculator-whats-my-rock-worth/

https://undervaluedequity.com/mineral-deposit-value-how-to-calculate-the-potential-value-of-a-mining-project/

The last link gives a clue on payability of concentrates.

Looking at the calcs, I think this is a much better short than say Qantas.

8

Bear77
Added a month ago

Yeah, negative 6 degrees in winter, isolated in the middle of Bosnia, and numbers that don't add up. I agree with you @edgescape - I don't short, but if I did...

8