Forum Topics ASX Small Companies
Mujo
Added a month ago

I thought the below as interesting take on the changed structure of the market.


Small caps bulldozed by ETFs

Small and micro-cap stocks are meant to be the mid to large caps of the future. But a combination of structural and cyclical trends have some in the market questioning their long-term viability.


The unstoppable wave of money flowing into exchange-traded funds is causing a crisis in capital formation for the hundreds of small and micro-cap stocks that comprise the bulk of the 2000 companies listed on the ASX.

The 1700 listed companies outside the S&P/ASX 300 are in the midst of a slow and painful decline that is undermining the two core reasons for listing: access to capital and liquidity.


Perennial’s head of smaller companies and micro caps, Andrew Smith, says the sector is turning the corner. Louie Douvis

Big super started to put small and micro-caps stocks in the dumpster in 2022 when the federal government’s Your Future, Your Super legislation made the S&P/ASX 300 the benchmark for MySuper’s Australian equity market returns.

The government was warned at the time that the MySuper benchmarks could encourage short-term decision-making, discourage investments that were not well represented by the benchmarks and reduce choice, diversification, active management and innovation.

That’s precisely what has happened.

Big super embraced index hugging to avoid being pinged by the regulator for the poor performance of their MySuper products. This profound structural change contributed to the closure of many small and micro-cap funds as well as the exit from the industry of half a dozen small-cap fundies.

“The challenge for most smaller growth companies is that they need access to capital and right now they’re being absolutely starved of capital,” says Mike Henshaw from Pure Asset Management, which runs the $112 million Pure Income and Growth Fund.


“We have this huge superannuation industry investing in venture capital in the US, which has abundant access to capital, but they won’t make an allocation to their home market for small caps outside the ASX 300.

“There are 1700 other listed companies which are deemed too illiquid or risky for the super industry, but AustralianSuper recently lost $1.1 billion on a private US tech stock.”

Small technology stocks trade at about one times revenue whereas big super, through private equity and venture capital mandates, pays three to four times revenue.

Another obvious anomaly is that the average price/earnings multiples for smaller companies (ex-S&P/ASX 300) are 40 per cent below the average P/E ratios for much larger companies.

Exchange-traded funds have become the preferred equity market exposure for retail investors, particularly young people. As a consequence, actively managed small and micro-cap funds have witnessed $2.4 billion in negative flows from the top 40 small-cap funds in the three years to December.

Australian exchange-traded funds now have a market cap of $255 billion, up 34.8 per cent or $66 billion over the past year, according to the February 2025 update from Betashares.

The retail exodus from small caps can be seen starkly in the consistent wave of redemptions from one of the most successful long-term small-cap funds, the Perennial Value Smaller Companies Trust run by Andrew Smith.

Renewed interest

The trust’s equity peaked at $234 million in December 2021 and then got hit by a wave of redemptions over the next three years, slashing net assets to $59 million at December 2024.

However, Smith, who was profiled by The Australian Financial Review as a Monday Fundie last year, says Perennial’s total FUM including small-caps, micro-caps, private companies and cash is about $1.2 billion, down from $1.3 billion three years ago.

Smith believes recent inflows into Perennial’s small-cap strategy, which is based on analysis of fundamental value, show that not only is the flight of institutional capital over, it is being replaced by renewed interest from industry funds.

“We all know some of that money went to passive and that creates a bit of volatility and less inefficient markets, which are good for stock pickers in the long run,” he says.

He says the recent similar movements in the share prices of large-cap stocks and small-cap stocks mean there is a huge catch-up to happen, because history says smaller companies outperform larger companies over the long run.

The inherent value among small- and micro-cap stocks is evident from the fact that since the beginning of 2023 40 small-cap industrials have been acquired at an average premium of 96 per cent.

The avalanche of passive money into the S&P/ASX 300 has seen many small-cap managers focus on picking the stocks about to go in the index because it usually means a 25 to 30 per cent re-rating.

Henshaw says successful privately owned small companies can initially raise money through friends and family, and then second or third degree connections, but at some point the network “just isn’t there to support the capital you need for growth”.

“So, Australian companies tend to list really early compared to elsewhere because there’s so little private capital out there, or at least the capital that is there is very hard to find,” he says.

“If you’re a small company making $20 million revenue and $1 million to $2 million profit, you need to spend nearly half of that being listed. You pay a heavy price for accessing the ASX, but you’re doing it so that you can raise capital and get liquidity, but right now, largely, you get neither.”

The predominance of the S&P/ASX 300 index as a benchmark and the breadth of stocks covered by the S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries Index has seen many small-cap funds reweighted toward stocks that are, in effect, large caps.

Capital expansion

Australia’s equity capital markets are heavily reliant on smaller companies for capital expansion, as detailed by Melbourne University academic Carole Comerton-Forde, who found nearly 80 per cent of capital raised by IPOs over the last 20 years was for companies with market caps of less than $75 million.

But in her report for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission published in February, she said the amount of capital raised in 2022 and 2023 was at the lowest level since 2012. The number of listed companies fell by 145 between January 2023 and December 2024, the largest two-year decline since the 1990s recession.

A spokesperson for the ASX says its twice-yearly small and mid-caps conference (SMIDCapa Conference) hosted by the ASX provides a platform for smaller listed companies to pitch their strategies directly to retail investors.

Also, since 2021, ASX has been supporting research by brokers on more than 100 smaller companies.

Max Cunningham, chief executive of the NSX, says his exchange offers smaller companies an alternative listing platform to the ASX with 50 to 60 per cent lower admission and annual fees.

Henshaw says it is positive that the Future Fund gave a small-cap mandate to Maple-Brown Abbott, but the market is in such dire trouble it needs federal government intervention such as an obligation on super funds to put 0.25 per cent of assets in small listed Australian companies that meet a minimum performance criteria.

15

Solvetheriddle
Added a month ago

I couldn't make much sense of this article. Usually, Tony Boyd does a good job, The article is muddled with different streams of thought and a huge dollop of self-interest (too much self-interest from contributors as usual for the finance industry). i had a quick look through the $300-700m market cap where the void between micro and ASX300 exists. There are many examples of good companies that are not unloved and can raise equity easily. Good companies will do well; the rest can please themselves. i would add that index inclusion/exclusion front running, only the finance industry could construct something so poor, is now a factor for the ST. The queue here, perhaps, is looking for the fallout on either side of this, for those interested in the ST. thats my opinion

18

Strawman
Added a month ago

I saw that article too @Mujo -- and I think it makes some good points.

The last few years certainly haven’t been kind to small caps (in general). Liquidity has dried up, valuations have been compressed, and passive fund flows have overwhelmingly favored the big end of town. But rather than lamenting this, I’d argue it has actually been a net positive.

To see why, let’s rewind to the 2020–2022 period, when capital was cheap and abundant. That was an era of soaring small-cap share prices, and the Strawman Index itself rocketed up more than 7x from the COVID lows to mid-2021. But much of that gain was untethered from business fundamentals. This was the period of Brainchip and other zero-revenue darlings trading at billion-dollar valuations. Even viable businesses were priced at levels that, in hindsight, were hard to justify.

Then the tide turned. Sentiment shifted, liquidity dried up, and the inevitable correction came (coinciding, incidentally, with the launch of Strawman Premium. Talk about timing..). A sizeable chunk of small caps deserved to be repriced, as their valuations had become detached from reality. But, as we saw at the time, plenty of genuinely strong businesses were dragged down too. (This was when you could pick up Catapult at 70c, Stealth at 10c, and Smart Parking at 15c etc)

The thing to note is that good businesses never had trouble raising capital. Sure, the terms weren’t as generous as they were in 2021, but that’s how capital markets should work. When money is scarce, it flows to where it’s genuinely needed and can generate the best returns. Dubious projects find it harder to get funding, while real businesses with real prospects continue to attract investment. That’s a healthy dynamic, and one that ultimately leads to more efficient capital allocation and better long-term outcomes.

Contrast that with large caps. Thanks to relentless passive fund flows, these companies have enjoyed a structurally lower cost of capital -- not because they’ve earned it, but simply because their share prices have been artificially propped up by indiscriminate buying. This has allowed them to fund projects that might not have passed the same scrutiny in a capital-starved environment. The natural mechanism that rewards high-quality businesses and starves weaker ones of capital has been distorted.

I’m not complaining, mind you. Just making the point that the best value is likely found outside the crowded mega-cap space.

And while it always feels good when share prices are lifted by non-operational factors like liquidity and sentiment, it also makes investing riskier. It makes identifying genuine value harder. Periods of easy money breed misallocation and excess.

From a practical standpoint, I don't think you can time these things, but it probably pays to be more cautious when liquidity and sentiment are high, and more aggressive when business performance is the main determinant of share prices. Not that that is an original take :)

24

Mujo
Added a month ago

Was a bit of a throw everything at the wall and see what sticks for why small caps underperformed article @Solvetheriddle.

The government intervention required part was very self-interested - albeit I guess the regulator has already intervened with the mysuper test which is which has created some of those issues.

That said I do wonder about bifurcation in our market where smalls can trade relatively cheap compared to rest of the world (at same market cap) and some mid/large caps trade at extreme premiums. It's not something I track but a few international investors have pointed it out who have no vested interest in saying so - Jeremy Raper was one I listened too on the weekend randomly.

As @Strawman pointed out provides the opportunity, so no use worrying about it and just focus on the companies.

15

Solvetheriddle
Added a month ago

@Mujo , interesting, and I'm not worrying about it at all. If I see a fat pitch, I'll swing. I keep reading how cheap the smalls are (very small, not in the 100-150 range), but I don't see it. I see a big bunch of poor businesses that I have no interest in and a small bunch of full to fair value businesses. Maybe my definition of cheap and strong business models is different from others', i.e., I'm being too picky or exacting, which could well be. lol

23

Mujo
Added a month ago

I think EOL was one trading at a very low multiple with a decent business model a few months ago. I get the point though, probably not a heap.

10