Forum Topics JHX--acquisition--diworsification?
Solvetheriddle
Added 10 months ago

I have no position here but do rate JHX as a success story in the US, being in a structural growth market with a large dollop of cyclicality, which we can see in its numbers.

JHX have acquired AZEK an outdoor flooring company, and is a large acquisition of about 50/50 cash/scrip and will comprise about 25% of the total company, so big. could be classed as an adjacency.

JHX is pointing out large synergies of about $350m on a combined $1.5b of EBITDA to justify the deal, ie, 23% -is a stretch, imo. those synergies are 2/3 other (revenues?) and 1/3 costs. Historically i get a bit uncomfortable at those numbers and mix.

Ive never heard of AZEK, not surprising the US is huge. ive put together a CFO-capex/cap employed for both below. AZEK was IPO's in 2020.

First up JHX, average 20% over the last 5 years which is a good number. the cyclicality is apparent, but overall strong business.

04fa6fe0e2f01a0349c5377f3a89e24f179658.png

Now for AZEK, an average of 4% over the last five years with a big increase in the last two years. the big question is the improvement sustainable? start of a trend or an ST move? will be critical to JHX.

After the recent poor REH news with its big US acquisition, even good mgt teams can be caught out in the US. I'm sceptical at this stage and would be reducing my buy targets for JHX.

would love to know why the AZEK guys sold, of course, we will likely never get the full story here. draw your own conclusions.

05aac90d1773e6b9914a87033fb90278bab0a6.png


All data was sourced from Seeking Alpha for AZEK and company reports for JHX.


15

mikebrisy
Added 10 months ago

Market not loving it!

$350m synergies ($125m cost, $225m revenue)?

@Solvetheriddle not familiar with either company, but here's my quick take on synergies.

SG&A of $AZEK for 2024 was $328m and for $JHX around $600m, so 5-year targeted cost synergies of $125m are 13%-14% of the combined SG&A.

As a business in the same sector, albeit an adjacency, it would be reasonable to ultimately get 20% of combined SG&A out over 5-years, so, $186m.

Makes the revenue synergies of $164m a little more plausible, i.e., $0.16bn/$5.5bn combined revenues or 3% of combined revenues.

However, I imagine that they've gone softer on the cost synergies than they think can be achieve, because these will be easier to track, and so they might hope to show outperofrmance.

The Revenue Synergies will be next to impossible to track over time - its very much going to be a "trust me".

Oldest trick in the M&A book!

Disc: Not Held

14