Some really great advice here from fellow straw people.
I have a number of investment properties. As I have written in previous posts, this is not due to some preference for residential real estate (RRE) as an investment class but due to a peripatetic lifestyle and the fortune to have had a high disposable income and great credit risk (as far as the banks are concerned; I am a doctor). This allowed is to buy a property in a number of the places we lived in over the years, though sadly not London. ln terms of capital gains these have all done well but are relatively hopeless investments in terms of income.
I would re-iterate a couple of points that have already been alluded to:
1) there are two broad approaches to RRE investments: you can either go for low capital appreciation and higher yield or the converse. Apartments and non-capital city houses would be examples of the former, larger land blocks in capital cities would typify the latter. Land taxes seem to increasing quickly and may impact the yield on the latter more than they currently do. The REAL yield on a block of land with a reasonable house in a capital city fringe setting is probably at best ~1%. This is lumpy and will be negative in approximately 1 year in 4. Property services will not tell you this.
2) If the goal is to own your own house somewhere you want to live, then the quickest way to do so is to accumulate enough in investable assets of any class to allow you to get a deposit big enough to service the loan without undue discomfort. It is entirely possible that the quickest way to this goal is not to invest in sub-standard, or for that matter, any other RRE asset. Rather invest in a different asset class that offers superior returns until you have achieved that goal.
3) Home ownership is not all it's cracked up to be, it's a pain in the ass. There is always something going wrong; plumbing, whiteware, termites, painting the exterior, the fence needs replacing, the tenants are cooking meth etc etc. If you want to run it yourself be prepared for continual hassle. If you get an agent to manage it prepare for your returns to miserable. Compare this experience to owning individual shares or ETFs or BTC, or pretty much any other asset class other than classic motor cars.
4) The majority of European countries have ~50% of the population that never buy their own home but are permanent renters. Admittedly, rental protection laws are often better in these countries, but it also likely represents a different mindset. We are obsessed with RRE in Oz.
Best of luck, I don't envy your dilemma
C
Pretty much agree with everything you've said @topowl. My cynicism grows by the year.
Thanks for a list of tips Tom - I'll look into them all.
Thanks for the comments about the Helptobuy scheme.
I've looked at it, but the draft legislation I've seen suggests that you need to live in it on an effectively permanent basis (you could move for a while for a new job). That would trap me in my current location. It might help me get in on the lower end of the market in Newcastle, but it's a big cost to be effectively stuck in your house (for years!) until such as time as you want to sell it.
To me, it also doesn't answer the question of whether Newcastle is even a good place to buy.
I very much agree that it's best to invest in something and live in it. That would be my preference, but I feel like my options are:
- Buy a shitty flat that is unlikely to appreciate in value.
- Use the Help to Inflate prices scheme and be trapped in my location (maybe worth cost).
- Buy in an investment property in any location and temporarily live in it to get all the tax benefits, but upend my life in the process again (I don't think this is wise or really feasible in most locations).
- Give up on the needing to live in it and turn it into a fullblown investment - accept that if I make a profit I'll pay tax.
Wrong asset class I know, but when there are smart people around it would be silly to not task.
I've come to the conclusion that it's a bit pointless trying to save my way to a house as prices are rising quicker than I can save. The government isn't interested in affordable housing and the current policies and economic structures are likely to drive prices even higher - at least until it collapses in a giant heap that the Government will step in to backstop. I'd love to purchase where I live, but can't do this anywhere I'd want to live that I think would be a good investment. That leaves the option of an investment property.
However... to me it's clear that I don't have the knowledge to make a smart real estate investment. Where should I buy? What should I buy? How does rent fit into this? I could build up my knowledge over time, but feel like it's smarter to get an agent.
This then leads the problem. How do you select a buyers agent that is going to be good? It seems like it's moderately easy to become a buyers agent and I suspect that many would be better than others. I also feel like buyers agents in a city are probably experts in that city, but not necessarily on where to buy - is where I live (Newcastle) or nearby even a good place to buy?
So my current thinking is that:
I started with the Australian Property Scout podcast (Scouting Australia) and they were talking a lot of sense. There's very much some hype and macho energy that I'm not a fan of, but in terms of identifying drivers of value, they seem to be nailing it (essentially, supply and demand, migration to an area often driven by investment, and affordability).
So I wanted to ask, does anyone know much Australian Property Scout or has anyone used their services?
Or, has anyone used the services of a similar organisation? Some chat GPT research tells me that Australian Property Experts might be similar and there were a bunch of others (House Finder, The Investors Agency, Ash Buyers Agency, High Income Property, Mackenzie Investment Group, and Invest and Grow).
Please feel free to challenge my conclusions about the right approach here as well.