I was very tempted to make a trade on coal under that same proviso, but I like to stay away from resources because I will admit I have no idea about the sector. However, it did feel clear can't just flick a switch, things take time.
"Things are never as bad as they seem and rarely as good as they appear." - Another related statement I like from a Value After Hours Podcast (potentially Dan Rasmussen from Verdad but might be wrong on the guest) is that share prices are 20x more volatile than the fundamentals of a business. Narrative/story drives the share price not fundamentals (at least over the short term). URW, renewables slump and AI are all good examples.
When writing my original post, I thought about the number of current examples for which AI is going to "kill an industry" or "that business is dead". I assume sweeping statements like that are almost always wrong. If AI is going to kill a business, why are you assuming they won't innovate to use AI? The use of AI may make the existing services significantly cheaper to provide, which in turn increases the demand for a product and creates greater profitability and/or value for the customer. On the flip side, using AI shouldn't be a must do for every business, there could be cases where the cost of implementing AI adds no tangible benefit or extra profitability to a business (at least at this stage where everyone is trying to figure out how to actually use the technology to their advantage).