Interesting take from the big brains at a16z.
The TLDR is The companies that win in this environment will be the ones delivering genuine value, not the ones that built the highest walls around their customer base.
Nice application of HH's 7 Powers to see where enduring moats might lie in the AI era.
Also Clay Christensen's Innovators Dilemma.
https://a16z.com/good-news-ai-will-eat-application-software/
They are understandably beating their own drum / pitching their expertise in this area.
Meanwhile, Anthropic have just released a plugin for Claude Cowork to do equity research.
https://claude.com/plugins/equity-research
I wasn't going to comment on this article, but now I can't resist. Firstly, i didint finish it, id had enough. i think it says more about the state of skittishness (or FUD as SM would say) in the market that this article got so much airtime than anything else. as ive written here before with Ai there is endless scenarios you can paint, and this is one of the darkest. IMO the stuff served up here ranges from possible to fantasy. the equivalent of going to a beach that just suffered a horrendous shark attack and yelling "shark" and watching the ensuing chaos..
People can do whatever they choose (and they will), i choose to listen carefully to the main players and see how the narrative changes. Take the Dwarkest podcast with Dario recently. Now he has his $30B in, he started backpeddling a little talked about the risks of timing demand and the lack of diffusion of AI into the economy. we shall see
I have to admit I’ve had half a bottle of wine so am presuming I’m a bit more susceptible to an argument than usual. Still, there was very little in this (very long) narrative that didn’t seem plausible. Perhaps the timeline is accelerated, but other than that it is dangerously realistic
Have to read it again without the aid of the Argentinian Malbec
Well worth the time