Forum Topics Fund Manager Insights
NewbieHK
Added a month ago

I have been listening to quite a few podcasts over the last few weeks. Most of those podcasts have been around interviews with Fund Managers. It’s been the usual questions i.e. Are we in a bubble? Where are the opportunities? How is your fund performing etc etc.

Some of the interest information I have collected include…

  1. Everyone seems to be beating the market or their bench mark. Interestingly, the definition of the market and bench marks varies significantly.
  2. the variation in stocks being held across different funds with everyone still winning (this says alot).
  3. the conflicting messaging from managers I.e some of the big tech companies are overvalued, money can be made investing in a smaller competitor (usually the argument presented if they don’t hold)
  4. we own the market leader it’s dominating with first mover advantage why would you invest in a smaller competitor (usually when they hold the market leader.
  5. point 3 and 4 mentioned by the same fund manager in the same interview about two different stocks ha ha ha ha
  6. mentioning multiple stocks that have increased by over 100% in the last 12m (no mention of those not performing)
  7. pumping stocks often with contradicting comments to other stocks they hold (this amazes me).


Make of it what you want however, I can’t help but, think we are presently in a rising tide lifts all boats situation or am I on an Oprah Winfrey show where you get car, they get car, we all get cars!

23

Solvetheriddle
Added a month ago

@NewbieHK , I know I may sound like a broken record, but retail and professional investing are very different. With retail investing, you get returns on your investments. With professional investing, you get returns from FUM. getting FUM means gaining confidence and trust from investors, ie being regarded as a guru. So you only talk to the media with a good story; otherwise, run for the hills, even if it means torturing the data until it confesses. never say "I was wrong' or worse "i don't know", instead say you're the Australian Warren Buffett etc (thanks Geoff). well-worn process.

The most useful thing I have for professional investors is finding those with similar styles to me and looking through any new ideas they may have. then do my own DD on these ideas.

Everything else is noise, especially opinions on macro and future market movements

28
raymon68
Added 2 years ago

Managed Funds - Income, Mutual & Investment Funds Australia (lincolnindicators.com.au)

Managed Funds for Australian Investors

Many Australians avoid investing in the stock market, afraid that it is an inherently difficult and stressful task. Unfortunately, their fear and inaction can leave them thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars behind their neighbours, colleagues, and family members.

Making your money work for you and achieving your financial goals via the stock market is easier than you might imagine. With managed funds, you can diversify and strengthen your investment portfolio, allowing yourself to create long-term wealth and an improved financial future.

Lincoln Indicators Managed Funds can cater for income, growth, or international diversification objectives.


d155ab90bc847c00a08a9c2b5c78684c14a5f8.png

5b5fb0bbfadf46dd54370be6d0e3963121ba99.png

6
raymon68
Added 2 years ago

Tamim

All Cap Unit Class: 1yr 22.73% return

MER 1.25% ( if Tamim keep the performance up the management fee looks to be worth it. )

We use a bottom up investment approach that can be broken down into 5 steps:


Idea generation - ASX company news flow, broker research and company roadshows, news publications and social media forums.

Company research - We conduct a company analysis on its business model, industry structure and future catalysts.

Financial analysis and modeling - We are looking for businesses that meet our key investment criteria.

Management meeting and analysis -We look at management historical track record and alignment with shareholders (remuneration/incentives/shareholding)

Valuation and portfolio allocation – Each company is valued using a range of valuation approaches. Portfolio allocation based on margin of safety and financial strength of the business.

( Distribution Frequency - Semi - annual.)

TAMIM Australia All Cap | TAMIM Fund - Tamim Asset Management

9de98e8a6097eb0d6b69ac0b1a8bfaad7dbdd9.pngk

e07c054ed4cff96a2fa50497f0e5b818cb9c92.png

6472afa8e96e4e6630321cc9c54990fb827478.png3f70f616e9967f10e1d1ac5b7a308d974c811d.png


6
Strawman
Added 2 years ago

Research like this comes out every so often and it always tells the same story -- "professional" investors usually lag the market.

c396d215ba99e50be7a47309206f4fb8697cc9.png

ae9e7ca2a50d0a3918fe34946da847d8175cd7.png

AFR link here if you have a subscription.

It's worse over longer time frames:

ad1534ebd0f577e78348f91b171b158cd429dc.png

Do it yourself, or go passive.

I don't need to pay someone 2%pa to lag the market when I'm perfectly capable of doing that myself :)

38

UlladullaDave
Added 2 years ago

There's no moat in stock picking – just look at how much key man risk is embedded in the listed FMs* – and, even worse, outperformance is a zero sum game.

It's highly unlikely that anyone can ex-ante predict who will outperform. So the solution is to focus on distribution, not returns. MFG didn't go from 30c to $60 because Douglass was adding a couple of hundred basis points in outpeformance. The real secret sauce was working out how to market a product that could charge people up to 1.6% a year to put their savings in McDonalds shares.

And you are right @Strawman you can have more fun DIY underperforming than paying someone to do it for you. Lol.

13