Hi Hackenbacker,
Regarding your questions:
SP3
Receipts from customers 1,536,00
Net cash used in operating activities -263,000
Net cash used in investing activities -60,000
Net cash from financing activities 422,000 (Proceeds from borrowings 470,000)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 919,000
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 1,018,000
My question is why would SP3 borrow 470,000 to increase cash flow over the quarter? They could have funded the cash deficit at the end of the quarter of 317,000 from the cash they had in the bank at the beginning of the quarter.
RCW
Receipts from customers 3,777,000
staff costs -4,384,000
Government grants and tax incentives 2,699,000
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities 430,000
Is this sustainable? with out the Government grants and tax incentives the total cash burn for the quarter would have been 2,507,000 or 31% of available cash at the beginning of the period.
I'm still pretty new so take this with a grain of salt but here are my 2 cents.
With regards to RCW, not being deeply familiar with the company, no it's not sustainable. Good pickup. I like to remove things like R&D tax incentives as well.
SP3 probably wasn't borrowing to increase cash flow but to increase cash reserves (maybe this is what you meant). They only have 5 quarters of funding left after borrowing the $470,000 anyways so they were probably going to need that money at some stage anyways (unless they're planning on being cash flow positive in the near future - again I'm not deeply familiar with the company). As to why now and not at the end of the quarter, I'm not sure. Maybe some is going towards working capital or they just thought now was a good time?