Pinned straw:
The discount was excessive as the funds were always going to come from mostly existing shareholders that are already "bought in". They would have preferred less dilution of course. And the best evidence was the institutional raise was over subscribed by 15%. This is a management team and Board that haven't got a great track record managing capital sadly.
Over the past 5 years shareholders have been diluted by more than 50%, while the Board and Management have received $12 million in salary and incentives, all funded by shareholders.
I do in tend to participate and see it through but I will be putting some hard questions to them at the upcoming AGM and voting against more dilution in the remuneration and rights plans they are proposing.