Pinned straw:
Regarding STK @edgescape - don't know if you caught the MoM podcast coverage of STK on Monday (6th Nov 2023) - so in case you missed it - here's a link: https://youtu.be/7Kxp2P_Mhyo?t=1859
They do talk about some of the positives, including:
And that's where I'm at with Strickland - NOT onboard - They're like DEG on a much, much, smaller scale - if Strickland have what they think they have underground at Marwari they could have plenty of upside from here, but if not, well...
I am somehow more comfortable with a share price going up at a 45 degree angle, or thereabouts, than one that's gone vertical. It smacks of over-exuberance to me.
I mean, these guys have 1,607,246,103 shares on issue, so they've gone from a market cap of $64.3 million in August (@ 4 cps) to now $281.3 million (at 17.5 cps) on 9th November; that's a +337.5% increase in around 10 weeks.
It's a very BIG SP and M/cap rise for a small gold explorer.
BTW, the Money of Mine (MoM) boys also highlighted STK back on August 24th - link below:
This ASX-Junior has $56m to Spend | Daily Mining Show - YouTube
Plain Text: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP0m3UwNL6I
If you want to skip directly to the discussion on STK that day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OP0m3UwNL6I&t=1326s
STK closed unchanged at 3.9 cps that day so their market cap was less than their cash balance at the time, and JD suggested that one of the reasons for that was probably that punters were sceptical that Strickland could replicate what they had achieved with Millrose, i.e. spend that cash wisely, so there wasn't a huge amount of confidence in Strickland's management and their ability to find another really decent deposit. The idea being that they would probably spend most if not all of that cash and end up with little or nothing to show for it. The inference is probably that Millrose was perhaps more the result of good luck than skill. However, Strickland DID go on to find more gold, and good grades too, so perhaps the time to be buying these companies is at times like those - when the company is trading at 3.9 cents per share, less than the value of their cash held at the time, and they have just sold a gold project for $61 million** to one of Australia's largest gold producers. Just saying...
** The Millrose GP (gold project) sale price was $61 million comprising $41m in cash plus 1.5 million fully paid ordinary Northern Star (NST) shares (which are subject to 12 months’ escrow) so the cash component was $41m but STK also received those 1.5m NST shares as well. That is outlined in these two announcements by Strickland:
Sale-of-Millrose-Project-for-$61M-to-Northern-Star-Resources.PDF [26-June-2023] and
Completion-of-Sale-of-Millrose-Project-to-Northern-Star.PDF [25-July-2023], however Northern Star (NST) said the sale price was $67m in their announcement:
NST-adds-ounces-and-commits-to-renewable-energy-at-Jundee.PDF [26-June-2023]
I can't really explain the $6m difference. It was certainly not the value of the NST shares because for 1.5m NST shares to be worth $26m, they would have to be trading at $17.33 each, and they were not anywhere near that high at the time. The VWAP (volume-weighted average price) for the previous week (prior to the 26-June-2023 announcements) would have been around $13.33 to $13.34 per NST share, which gives a $20m valuation for 1.5m NST shares, and that checks out against Strickland's announcements, but not NST's. Perhaps a typo on NST's part. What's $6m between friends?!
Disclosure: I did NOT buy STK at 3.9 cps in August. I wish I had. I do not own any STK shares (but I do hold NST shares).
Further Reading: Yandal East Project / Projects / Strickland Metals Limited