Pinned straw:
The market too remains pretty sceptical @Byrnesty -- which is not unreasonable at all.
One point to clarify -- my read was that the adjusted positive EBITDA target was after accounting for the (very real) capiatlised development costs. ie. they are reducing EBITDA by the costs spent on development. Which would be far more reasonable.
When we spoke with him, Jason did expand on the expectation for "Management Operating cash flow" -- a metric that does account for capitalised costs -- to be positive on a run rate basis sometime this year.
I could be wrong, so please let me know if anyone else reads it differently!