Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese discussed critical minerals in a phone call yesterday with US President Donald Trump.
The PM said in a post on social media platform X that he had “another warm and constructive conversation” with the US president and they discussed the two countries’ trade and economic relationship “as well as areas for growth including critical minerals”.
It was the fourth phone call between the two leaders. The PM has not yet secured a face-to-face meeting with the President.
The Federal Government has been keen to negotiate exemptions to US tariffs on imports, which include a 50 per cent tariff on aluminium and steel, with some viewing US access to Australia’s critical mineral deposits as a bartering chip in trade talks.
The most recent call between the Albanese and Trump follows the August visit to the White House by BHP chief executive officer Mike Henry and his Rio Tinto counterpart Simon Trott, as well as Trott’s predecessor at Rio Tinto, Jakob Stausholm.
The BHP and Rio Tinto executives visited the White House to advocate for US copper projects, particularly the BHP–Rio Tinto Resolution Copper joint venture, which has been embroiled in red tape and legal issues for the better part of two decades.
The meeting at the White House highlighted the importance of Australian miners to the US, as the US Government sought to secure critical supply chains for its defence and technology industries.
Following the August 21 meeting, Henry thanked the US Government “for their strong leadership to reinvigorate mining and processing supply chains in and for America”.
“Resolution Copper is one of the largest untapped, high grade copper resources in the US today and will create thousands of high value local jobs in Arizona and billions in economic activity across America,” he said in a statement on LinkedIn.
“Copper is essential to everyday life as a critical component in powerlines, smartphones, medical equipment, cars, and data centres. Demand for copper is growing strongly.
“The world needs more mining to build the future.”
On the back of the White House meeting, Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, told a forum in August that Australia could become “a great power – if not a superpower – in critical minerals and rare earths”.
“We have the biggest mining industry and the largest mining companies in the world,” the former Prime Minister told the forum, hosted by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. “Most of the periodic table is under our soil. (And) now we’re adding processing.”
Rudd added the caveat that both countries had to get their policy settings right to capitalise on the opportunity.
“The missing piece is pricing, and we’ll work that out with our partners,” he said. “If we get it right, Australia will become a great power – if not a superpower – in critical minerals and rare earths.”
Tossed up whether I should add this post to the Lithium forum, or here -- went with the latter as I think the trend is broader than just one critical material.
When Warren and co start to invest in a big way like this, I take note -- albeit acknowledging that this adds to my confirmation bias nicely.
There are some significant investments, with respect to critical materials, being made for two reasons:
I have lithium investment, although not a direct play, through Mineral Resources. For a more pure-play, I have recently added Pilbara Minerals. Both of these are through my super holdings, which I tend not to add to Strawman, so I likely wont be adding them on here.
Where I am most bullish is the anode side, specifically battery-grade anode (high quality graphite). There are existing traditional uses for graphite, including refractories, foundries, lubricants. But in 2022, for the first time, the demand for graphite in battery anodes surpassed all other uses combined. This isn't going away. On the anode side, my pure play is Novonix in the US, and in Europe I like Talga, although I am less bullish there due to the shit show that is the EU and Sweden.
I think there will be a few winners (like in most industries), with lots of investment wasted by minnows trying to get there. I think thats why I like MinRes and to a lesser extent Pilbara, they can invest using their existing cash flow and won't be sent broke in striving for growth. Novonix is a little different in that, there is no existing operation/cash flows helping them scale up. This will likely mean lots more dilution in getting there, but I am put at ease by the fact that the US continues to support them in a big way and they are shaping up as one of the leading case studies for the US government i.e. 'we are helping develop critical minerals onshore in the US'
For the most part though, I think there is a sizeable opportunity here provided you can pick the winner/s. Lots of risk obviously, but I think we are starting to get a much clearer picture on who might benefit from the new world order and who won't make it.
13-May-2024, ahead of tomorrow's federal budget... One of tomorrow's budget papers will be all about women. Here's what you need to know - ABC News
Goodo, perhaps a boost for listed Childcare centres, but that's not a sector I dabble in. However, here's another idea: Australia’s Budget Will Boost Critical Minerals, Treasurer Jim Chalmers Says - Bloomberg
The video was recorded yesterday - or posted by Bloomberg yesterday anyway - so is recent:
Plain text link to that section of the discussion: https://youtu.be/b14Xad6EkBY?t=154
[or just click on Jim's right ear above]
And to the entire video - from the start: https://youtu.be/b14Xad6EkBY
Do you remember this announcement from ARU in mid-March? Commonwealth-Government-supports-Nolans-with-US$533m-package.PDF
Sounds like there's more where that came from.