Forum Topics PIQ PIQ PIQ valuation

Pinned valuation:

Added 2 months ago
Justification

Bear - 285k Tests sold in FY30 - Royalty of US$30/Test

Base - 1.35m Tests sold in FY30 - Royalty of US$40/Test

Bull - 2.9m Tests sold in FY30 - Royalty of US$50/Test

Until first sales, low chance of Bull case.

2b1a6be7cacb5e18557837fe424247d6aa701e.jpeg

Bear77
Added 2 months ago

Considering that WIDE range of prices between your bear case and the bull case, even the huge difference between your bear case and your base case, I reckon I would personally have a price target or valuation that was a lot closer to my bear case valuation than to my base case valuation, particularly if you are fairly negative on the stock, or believe their report is more negative than positive, as indicated in your straw @Bradbury . This one is well outside my own wheelhouse, so I wouldn't be investing in them - been burnt with too many biotechs when I was younger and sillier. These days I'd rather make direct donations to medical research and claim the tax deduction than do it via propping up the salaries and directors' fees at biotechs and then having to claim a capital loss. But then, perhaps I'm just getting old and cynical...

7

Bradbury
Added 2 months ago

It’s a fair observation and really with how Proteomics have been struggling to generate revenue from their primary test it probably would be prudent to increase the bear case weighting.

I mostly wanted to try get a feel of the potential outcomes and what the current price expectations.

PIQ is a hangover from my initial Covid speccy days and also outside of core understandings.

Thanks for the feedback on the valuation. I will take it onboard for the next ones I’m work through.

6