Forum Topics LOV LOV LOV valuation

Pinned valuation:

Added a month ago
Justification

16/11/2024

It looks like it’s been over 12 months since my last valuation (I didn’t date it). There’s been a 59% jump in the share price in the last year and I suspect the valuation has jumped also.

Let’s take a look!

@Slew has done some work on store roll outs so far this year (36) which seems to be not as good compared to last year at this stage (99 total rollout last year).

What do the analysts think will happen with earnings? There quite a few that follow Lovisa (a consensus of 14 on Simply Wall Street for forecast earnings data)

467518930a6eff25a2091ecac3c12e313d80ac.jpeg

Source: Simply Wall Street

For FY25 the consensus NPAT is 95 cps and heading up steadily over the next few years. If this turns out to be close that’s a massive 125% ROE based on shareholder equity of 73 cps at the end of FY24. That’s the highest forecast ROE of all the businesses I hold IRL.

2727fd4a45e9292c0e15334f81fde4ebf2b802.jpeg

If I use McNiven’s Formula and assume ROE can be maintained at 125% (unlikely I believe), shareholder equity of 73 cps, 15% of earnings reinvested, 85% earnings paid as unfranked dividends (approx 2.8%), I get a valuation of $25 for a 10% required annual return. So even though the share price is well down from its 12 month high of $37.48, it doesn’t look cheap to me.

5ece3cd71075adbd758cff73d23156a501c885.jpeg

Source: Simply Wall Street

The other thing to note is that over the last 4 years Lovisa has paid out more in dividends than it had in NPAT! The dividends are well covered by cash flow, but over the same time debt has risen and cash reserves have fallen. Four years ago Lovisa had no debt and $38 million in cash. Now it has $54 million in debt and $35 million in cash. Still very conservative, however, I’m not sure if Lovisa can continue to pay out more dividends than NPAT continually. It’s not something you see a lot. Perhaps Brett Blundy can see the business spewing more cash into the future? He generally sees high ROE as KING, and debt as the enemy!

d7c7883b6a04197f90e1a1b6b5759ee53f40d1.jpeg

Source: Simply Wall Street

Looking at my current valuation I probably should have been selling Lovisa last month. For me it’s a hold for now. I don’t think it’s cheap enough at $29 per share.

Held IRL (0.8%)

11/2023?

FY23 NPAT $68.2M up 20.1% on last year, but was 7.5% below analysts consensus of $73.7M.

FY23 EPS 63.3cps up 16.6% on last year.

Final Dividend 16% lower at 31cps compared to 37 cps last year. Total FY23 dividends of 69cps representing a 109% payout ratio. This is a worrying trend. For high ROE businesses I would prefer to see more earnings reinvested into growth.

Franking reduced to 70% compared to 100% previously. With a higher proportion of overseas earnings this might be the norm from here on.

Total shareholder equity of $80M, with 110M shares outstanding at 30 June 2023. Equity per share of 72.7cps.

Return on Equity (ROE) at 85.3%. While this is likely the best in the ASX retail sector, it’s not as high as I was expecting (+90%).

Using McNiven’s StockVal formula assuming forward ROE of 85%, equity of 73cps, 10% of earnings reinvested, and a required annual return of 10%, I get a valuation of


RogueTrader
Added a month ago

Just re the store rollout numbers for LOV, as I mentioned to Slew previously, that total of 36 for the year would be the total up to early November, thus only about 4 months into the year, so 36*3=108, which seems a very reasonable rate of new store openings. The weird thing is that Citi have downgraded LOV "after flagging slower-than-expected store rollouts and competitive risk from new rival Harli + Harpa." https://www.capitalbrief.com/briefing/citi-downgrades-lovisa-on-slow-store-roll-outs-competition-491e3d03-001e-4b13-a452-38ed04794438/

Have they made the same mistake as Slew, and looked at the 36 number as "halfway through the year"? (rather than only 1/3?) And is a huge multi-national chain, with nearly 1000 stores all over the globe, supposed to be intimidated by an upstart chain with a grand total of 3 stores? As for poaching, I'd think Lovisa with their much deeper pockets could poach any and all of their competition's staff if they really wanted to. Or just start a discount war until they cry "Uncle!" :)

Summary: with the sp being hammered for totally ridiculous reasons, LOV is now a great buying opportunity.

27

Solvetheriddle
Added a month ago

@RogueTrader i do tend to agree. LOV AGM this Friday, i would like to hear what they say. it would not surprise me that store rollouts are slow with the extended CEO changeover, hard to see competition being an issue anytime soon, maybe never. IMO. LOV has had a history of large drawdowns, that have been an oppty historically. ill wait but its in the zone now. imo

26

mikebrisy
Added a month ago

@Solvetheriddle and @RogueTrader I agree $LOV is starting to look interesting again.

My Val. From 8 months ago was $30 ($23-$37), which should probably be upped to about $32.

Recent discussion here on rate of store adds indicates $LOV is tracking just below my central case. Of course, even more important than volume of stores is the quality of locations and terms of the lease, and it gets increasingly difficult over time to unpick that.

I agree with @Solvetheriddle, during the period of CEO transition we shouldn’t expect to see much beyond $LOV just chugging along doing its thing. But I think that’s exactly what shareholders should want to see.

All the recent press from recent weeks about the ex-CEO competitor is way overblown. Barriers to entry in this game are almost non-existent. But $LOV has 14 years head start, a global footprint, established brand, and global supply chain.

I’m not dismissing competition as a threat. But there are many others to be thinking about like Forever 21, H&M, Claire’s, Zara Accessories. These already have scale and regional/global reach.

I’ll also be listening to what is said at the AGM, and am now watching $LOV closely.

I am interested to learn more about the new CEO, however. Particularly given recent press.

But if it hits @Rick ’s $25.00 then it’s hard to imagine I wouldn't be back in.

Disc. Not held

23

Rick
Added a month ago

I agree @mikebrisy. I’ll be adding more at $25, if it gets there.

14