Forum Topics HIT HIT Mystery stock?

Pinned straw:

Last edited 12 months ago

Past Performance

Here is a business that has consistently delivered strong financial performance over the past four years:

  • annual gross profit growth CAGR of 22%
  • EBITDA CAGR of 19.5%,
  • increased shareholder equity by 57% (14cps to 22cps)
  • increased cash reserves by 140% (from $5 million to $12 million)
  • remains debt free (has been for 9 years)
  • has averaged over 60% ROE
  • Has paid out 5% fully franked dividends (7% gross yield)

b3aa84573509963207320a615c75d2be8c99a3.jpeg

In fact it has 10 years of consistent growth and improving quality (ROE). Free cash flows have followed NPAT reasonably well.

ad4825b39743699a4cc814e0e5117cbe189f63.jpeg

In FY204, HiTech delivered a record year with Gross Margin growth of 16.5% and EBITDA growth of 16.6%, capitalising on the growing demand for ICT professionals to drive digital transformation. However, revenue did fall:

  •  Operating Revenue of $63.6m - down 14.5%
  • Gross Profit of $12.8m, 20% GP margin – an increase of 16.5% year on year
  • EBITDA of $8.9m, 14% EBITDA margin – an increase of 16.6% year on year
  • NPAT of $6.03m - an increase of 10.9% year on year
  • EPS of $0.14 – an increase of 10.6% year on year
  • Strong balance sheet with $12.1m in cash reserves
  • Full year fully franked dividend of 10 cents per share

Go Figure!

Theres no doubt this business has performed very well, yet here I am scratching my head and wondering why it trades on a PE multiple of 13.6 x FY2024 earnings per share (14 cps) and the share price hasn’t moved in four years!

ce76681e08e1b3416d1081348bbbe11791ca0b.jpeg

Valuation

Maybe the share price hasn’t moved because it was overpriced 4 years ago and the performance is just catching up with the share price? I think that’s party true.

If I use McNiven’s Formula to value the business assuming future ROE of 60%, shareholder equity of 22 cps, 30% of earnings reinvested, 70% of earnings paid out as 5% fully franked dividends (7% gross yield), and requiring a 12% return I get a valuation of $2.00. Assuming 11% annual return the valuation increases to $2.20. Hitech has a market cap of only $84.6 million. If this were a larger, better known business I doubt you could buy it for a PE multiple of 13.6.

Liquidity

I think the other problem Hitech has is low liquidity. Over 72% of the shares are owned by insiders. The Hazouri brothers own 67% of the business between them. Only 21% of the business (value $17.7 million) are in the hands of the general public. Today only 21,593 shares were traded and the share price was down 5% ($1.90). Over the last month shares have traded between $1.78 and $2.00. I think you could do OK picking up shares on the days when there are no buyers.

1032502925a07c86f64f51bae007f0cd36b323.jpeg

The Future

Hitech doesn’t provide guidance and there is no analyst coverage. I think it should perform well into the future with the demand for ICT growing steadily.

379f3937ba367244612865f78aedfa23693284.jpeg

Will shareholders ever see share price appreciation? I’m starting to wonder? I’m going to hang on to the small holding we have as it pays a good dividend while I wait and see. There’s no debt and there’s $12 million cash on the balance sheet ready for an acquisition that will further add to EPS growth. However it might be hard to find an another business with ROE to match Hitech’s 60%. Maybe the board should just had over a bit more cash in dividends. There’s plenty there to give back to shareholders!

Held IRL (0.5%)

edgescape
Added 12 months ago

Not being able to grow the top line revenue has to be the reason.

Revenue sort of kept shrinking with negative growth now in the most recent update.

12

Mujo
Added 12 months ago

It’s the fear that government spending will finally be cut back or brought in house instead of outsourced. First it was labour cutting back on consultants, then it was the downturn in IT after the COVID boom and now it’s fear leading into the election.

That said they have consistently delivered that’s for sure, and profit has grown consistently despite the issues. I do think you need that revenue growth though to see any market attention as @edgescape said.

17

Rick
Added 12 months ago

Thanks for your replies @edgescape @Mujo. I think you’ve nailed it. Revenue has come off and the concern about the government bringing more ICT professionals in-house. There is also the risk of cuts to government spending.

I think @Wini mentioned last year that Hitech’s revenue is shifting more toward the higher margin recruiting services as the government brings more ICT in-house. At the same time ICT contracting services have contracted resulting in lower revenue, higher margins and higher profits.

So the question is where will all this end up? Will the recruiting services steady up? The market is probably nervous about the uncertainty that lies ahead which probably explains why the share price hasn’t moved in 4 years.

14

mikebrisy
Added 12 months ago

@Rick I broadly agree with the comments on this one. Without revenue growth, there has to be limited scope on margin improvement. Thinking ahead, if I was to see revenue growth tick up again, say in FY25, I then have to ask the question “what is the quality of that growth”? Recruiting services is a pretty competitive space, and I have no idea if these folk have any edge that would allow them to sustain any performance shown for a period. It doesn’t look compelling to me, even though the metrics are pretty attractive for a small business as you’ve shown. But then again, I am only commenting superficially and haven’t checked under the bonnet.

13

Rick
Added 12 months ago

@mikebrisy Hitech have a few tools (eg. Hibase) that might give them an edge in a competitive market. However, for Hitech to do well the demand still needs to be there. Anyway, it’s a tiny company and almost impossible to build a meaningful position in.

f5d2fc893f88aa788d00580693581929167106.png

13

Chagsy
Added 12 months ago

@Rick

ive been a holder for some time and it ticks along ok. One previous problem had been the Hazouris rewarding themselves with options, so EPS hasn’t been great. That seems to have moderated of late.


10

rh8178
Added 12 months ago

I hold IRL as well. On my numbers since late 2019, about a 19% return p.a. Not mind blowing, but not bad either - the dividend yield is high which might be making the share price appreciation look a little soft. At least you have founders with significant skin in the game - agree with @Chagsy they have been a bit generous (to themselves) in the past but it is moderating. The narrative of government looking to "in source" a lot of what HIT provides isn't new, and the business has still managed to grow and provide excellent ROE despite this headwind.

11

edgescape
Added 12 months ago

Would also add the declining revenue growth would effectively discount PE as well as investors exit to chase more highly priced stocks that have better "futrue" growth prospects (both revenue an earnings). That's even if earnings were growing.

You already saw Gentrack as one example where the profitability went backward but the share price went up due to the revenue growth and also the big wins in Asia. Already it seems some people were latching on the Asia and Saudi Arabia wins and trying to extrapolate what the future earnings would be for next year and pretty much saw through why the profit went down due the performance shares being issued.

7