Forum Topics CSL CSL 1H FY25 Results

Pinned straw:

Added 4 weeks ago

Global plasma products leader $CSL announced their HY results today.

ASX Announcement

Their Headlines

  • Revenue $8.48 billion, up 5% at CC
  • NPAT $2.01 billion1 , up 6% – NPAT $2.04 billion1 at CC, up 7%
  • NPATA $2.07 billion, up 3% – NPATA $2.11 billion at CC, up 5%
  • NPATA earnings per share $4.292 , up 3% – NPATA earnings per share $4.36 at CC up 4%
  • Interim dividend of US$1.30 per share – Converted to Australian currency, the interim dividend is approximately A$2.08 per share, up 16%
  • Guidance reaffirmed – FY25 NPATA anticipated to be in the range of approximately $3.2 billion to $3.3 billion at CC, up approximately 10-13%. 


My Quick Analysis

Having exited $CSL last year, today's result confirms my thesis - strong Behring (+10%) already baked into the SP, lack lustre Sequirus (-9%), and only modest growth in Vifor (+6%)- an acquisition that was overpaid for.

Vaccinations in the US were a big driver of the weakness in Sequirus.

Top line performance wasn't helped by cost management. While R&D was lowever (given the end of the 112 program; but committed to spend normal levels of R&D as % revenue for FY), G&A blew up by 27% (driven by "one off projects") and even sales and marketing at +7% grew faster than revenue (+5%).

Behring continues to do the heavy lifting and I think we just aren't seeing the weight of growth from new products sufficient to meet the maturing portfolio and competitive/business environment headwinds in Vifor and Sequirus, respectively.

Going into today's results, most analysts had a very different view to me, with the TP consensus some +20% ahead of the SP. The gap seems to be widening, with the SP down -4% at time of writing.

$CSL's lacklustre performance is starting to challenge the notion of value even at the declining P/E of 25. While FY guidance is being held to (due to approvals, expected launches, and some material vaccine orders which should help H2), even at sub-$260, I don't necessarily see value here.

Are the analysts just seeing what they want to see here (driven by memories of glory days), or will we now start to see some PT downgrades drive by reality?

Glad to have called this one early, and it will be interesting to see if the R&D pipeline is sparking back to life at the R&D day later this year. Don't get me wrong, even as a maturing business, Behring is a powerful engine, and at some point $CSL could present value again. So I continue to watch.

Disc Not Held

Solvetheriddle
Added 4 weeks ago

Yes agree, in line with my "losing my religion" piece last year. your comment about the new products not being enough to replace the decline in legacy products is spot on, imo. mainly due to over-achieving previously, now the new normal imo. Behring is a beast but note they pushed out the achievement of pre-C19 margins to 2027, not 2026. plus the newer businesses are not as good. CSL is a good company but has come back to the pack with earnings slowing and so has the rating to some degree. "Diworsification" hasnt helped, imo.

have internet back so i will have a closer look

as far as broker PT's, i can only quote myself when asked how they can be made more useful, "please deliver printed on a roll of two-ply with perforated edges" (That is only half a joke)

hold a small position--there are some quality overseas companies that offer better r/r metrics (as is common with many ANZ champions)


25

mikebrisy
Added 4 weeks ago

@Solvetheriddle at what point does a new CEO come in, sell Sequirus and Vifor, and focus everything on Behring.

I wonder how many IB pitch packs have put that proposal to Paul McKenzie?

21

Solvetheriddle
Added 4 weeks ago

@mikebrisy yeah ive thought the same thing, and i think we are not alone. they did a good job adding value in Seqirus but its now probably better out of the stable. Vifor maybe too soon to admit an error, they will persevere for a while i suspect.

23

Mujo
Added 4 weeks ago

I think CSL is actually looking attractive. Behring continues to do its thing. Seqirus was the big letdown, which is always cyclical and really expected - bird flu preparedness revenue to be recognised in future periods should provide some floor against RFK. Jnr.

It was in bubble territory for the better part of a decade and people are getting to their lost faith point. Probably around fair value here now. With a market that's expensive I don't think that's bad.

512b3ae5835b41240b81260810fcf87b5c519a.png

27

mikebrisy
Added 3 weeks ago

Just listened to Intelligent Investor Podcast with John, Graham and Gaurav giving their views following results of $CSL, $AD8 and $COH,

Link to Podcast

You can hear Graham Witcomb's analysis of $CSL at the start of the podcast after the intro (so starting from about 00:55). Unlike a few of us here, he cotinues to be bullish, believing that after doing nothing for 5 years, $CSL now looks interesting.

For those interested in this viewpoint, but not wanting to listen to the podcast (I did while doing some domestic chores this morning) I got my BA ChatGPT to summarise Graham's key arguments as follows.

TLDR: @Mujo, I think it is fair to say that Graham agrees with you.

---------------------

Generated by Chat GPT from podcast transcript

Graham Witcomb believes CSL Ltd (ASX:CSL) now represents an attractive investment due to its strong performance in its core business segment, despite challenges in some areas. His key reasons and drivers include:

1. Strength in the Behring Division (Plasma & Antibodies)

  • CSL Behring, the company's core division, has been performing exceptionally well.
  • Antibody sales grew 15% this year, significantly above the market rate.
  • Key products Privigen and Hizentra are in high demand and well-received by patients.
  • The division remains the primary profit driver for CSL, offsetting weaknesses elsewhere.


2. Challenges in the Vaccine Division (Seqirus)

  • Seqirus (Vaccine Division) faced a 9% decline in revenue, mainly due to decreasing flu vaccination rates.
  • This trend is influenced by vaccine hesitancy and misinformation, exacerbated by political factors in the U.S.
  • However, CSL is becoming more efficient in vaccine production and is shifting to a more specialized approach, targeting specific groups and commanding higher prices.
  • The company is investing in mRNA vaccines, already launching one in Japan, ensuring it remains competitive in the evolving vaccine landscape.


3. Short-Term Weakness in Vifor (Iron Deficiency Treatments)

  • The Vifor Division (focused on iron deficiency treatments) has underperformed, contributing to weaker sentiment.
  • However, Witcomb believes these are temporary challenges that will not significantly impact long-term growth.


4. Valuation & Investment Opportunity

  • CSL’s stock price has dropped from over $300 to around $260, partly due to concerns over vaccine sales and broader market uncertainty.
  • The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio has compressed, making it more attractively valued relative to historical levels.
  • Witcomb sees this as an opportunity, arguing that the core Behring Division’s strength will outweigh temporary issues in vaccines and iron treatments.
  • Over a 10-year horizon, he expects CSL to be substantially larger, supported by demographic trends and continued demand for its therapies.


Conclusion

Despite short-term headwinds in its vaccine and iron deficiency businesses, CSL remains a fundamentally strong, critical healthcare company with significant long-term growth potential. Witcomb sees the current lower valuation as a buying opportunity for investors, particularly given the robust performance of the Behring Division, which he believes will continue to drive CSL’s future expansion.

-----------------------------


I've plotted the P/E evolution of last 7 years below for context.

34b72ca582b662925f424f99fa94326a08ae8d.png


Disc: Not Held (Previously held)

19

Mujo
Added 3 weeks ago

I can’t say i’m a screaming bull, i think it’s fair value here, but i do expect it will outperform the asx200 given the outlook and valuations for banks and resources.

The Behring business continues to be the jewel and they should’ve just focused on that. Sequirus hasn’t been the worst but think they could’ve been just as good for shareholders without it, and Vifor screams of overpaid management itching to do something and as a result have destroyed value. That said i think Vifor should stabilise near here, but will continue to disappoint.

20

Parko5
Added 3 weeks ago

So what would it take for you to be a CSL buyer?

8

Mujo
Added 3 weeks ago

I generally try to focus on small/mids but CSL is at a level now of being attractive.

I think I may buy some in my SMSF but I tend to be a bit more short sighted and would wait to near the next results to have another look. Whenever you ask people on views, especially when thinking about ausbiz etc i 'd also ask what is their time horizon just as a pet aside point.

Looking at it through this framework, without a heap of work.

46ddb4dbc528405706d512cfedb039e1d2055c.png

As I mentioned I think the P/E contraction is nearly over so can focus on the dividend and EPS Growth. Dividend is in the 1.5% range adjusted for debt and growing EPS in the 10% range you could get a 10-11%pa (brokers have mid-teens so a lot of upside if they're right) from here over a long enough time horizon. Assumes Behring continues to grow at 10-15%, Vifor can do 2-3% and Sequirus is stable.

I think the Macquarie price target of $500 from 12 months ago or whatever required on a PE expansion back to the last 5 year historical range but I think that's overly optimistic - and clearly wrong so far.

19