Forum Topics SPZ SPZ TrustPilot

Pinned straw:

Added 2 months ago

I was doing some research a few weeks ago on Smart Parking to see if I would reinvest in the company after exiting during Covid to buy a house. I came across some pretty scathing reviews on Trustpilot (here), and I was a bit flummoxed.

Whilst I can appreciate that a fine enforcement company wouldn't be expecting glowing reviews from issuing fines, however most of the bad experiences listed on the website seem to be about incorrect fines, poor service, and engagement of debt collectors (even when fines are in dispute).

Outside of considering these reviews, the growth in the UK does not seem to be slowing down (up by 22% PCP) so it doesn't look like slowing down anytime soon. Lots of people have suggested they have written to their local politician for action, however I'm not expecting any changes implemented in the short term and I believe that the likelihood of this risk materialising is extremely low.

On the flip side, if there was some knee jerk regulatory changes or in the absolute worst case had their British parking association approved operator scheme revoked it would materially impact revenue generation.

I'm am keen to understand the Community's position on how much weighting they give to review pages like this (i.e. Customer Star ratings or workplace review sites such as Glassdoor), and if this has any bearing when they are putting together their investment case.

mikebrisy
Added 2 months ago

@SudMav I do look at review sites like Product Review and Glassdoor, but I always consider the context. What might motivate a customer to go to a Parking Enforcement review website?

One thing I usually do when looking at reviews is to benchmark with competitors (You might have seen me present some of this analysis when I've looked at other companies on here). There are a lot of private car parking operators in the UK. So just check out the Trustpilot scores for companies like Horizon Parking (1.2) and Initial Parking (1.1) and compare with $SPZ (1.1). You'll get the gist.

However, some of the established brands like NCP and APCOA actually have pretty good scores (4.4 , 4.2 respectively). From my time in the UK I recall that these firms tend to operate municpal purpose-built parking structures, and are quite different from firms like $SPZ that manage an area that has been turned into a car park by a private landlord (pub, gyms, shopping centre).

So, in summary, it is probably worth doing some analysis on this. An overwhelmingly bad public response to any company or the sector in general could conceivably result in a regulatory or political reaction. You have to accept that as part of your investment thesis in $SPZ. That's why the voluntary code efforts in the last few years in the UK have been so important. It is also why I regularly scan the UK press for stories, like the Guardian article I shared on Monday. The industry knows that the government can easily take away its licence to operate, so it is their interests to self-regulate.

Any holder of $SPZ should be in a constant state of unease that 88% of EBITDA comes from one market, where government or regulatory action in response to a public outcry could wipe out the business at the stroke of a pen.

And you don't need to take my word for it, because essentially that's what happened in QLD. In response to a public outcry anout "predatory" and "exploitative" practices, the Minister essentially shut off access to the Government number plate system. BAM! No business.

That's why I am so keen for $SPZ to diversify its market footprint, and why I am so pleased about the US acquisition.

30

SudMav
Added 2 months ago

Thanks @mikebrisy. Your answer was perfect!

I will do more research and will have to weigh it up against the risks and trade offs and do some more reading on the acquisition before I make the judgement call on whether to get back in

10