Forum Topics PNV PNV 1H FY25 Results

Pinned straw:

Added 2 months ago

$PNV published their HY result, with the call starting in 3 minutes.

A few quick observations from me, not going over old ground that we've covered here before:

  • Expense control OK, with Opex up +15.4% cf. Revenue +22.8%
  • Operating Cashflow strongly negative .... why is this?
  • Modest NPAT increase up to $3.338m compared with $2.694m in PCP
  • New products still at the pre-clinical phase, with R&D spending modest
  • New facilities on track.


Overall impression - nothing here causing me regret on my exit decision. I still think its trajectory has slowed too quickly for this to represent a compelling investment proposition. I don't have a view on fair value based on these numbers. But my model is shot, as is my thesis.


Here's a complete summary courtesy of my BA ChatGPT (I've had a quick look - it seems OK, but I've not vetted it in detail, so beware!)


PolyNovo 1H FY25 Performance Summary (Compared to 1H FY24)


Summary

PolyNovo delivered a strong first-half FY25 performance, marked by record sales, improved profitability, and strategic advancements in product development and market expansion. While operating cash flow turned negative due to increased investment in growth, the company remains well-funded, with A$30.5 million in cash reserves. With continued investments in manufacturing, R&D, and clinical trials, PolyNovo is positioning itself for sustained long-term growth.


Financial Highlights

  • Total Sales: A$54.1 million, up 28.1% from A$42.2 million in 1H FY24.
  • Total Revenue (Including BARDA): A$59.9 million, up 22.8% from A$48.8 million.
  • Net Profit After Tax (NPAT): A$3.3 million, an increase of 23.9% from A$2.7 million.
  • U.S. Sales: A$41.2 million, up 27.9% from A$32.2 million.
  • Rest of the World (ROW) Sales: A$12.9 million, up 28.6% from A$10.0 million.


Cash Flow Highlights

  • Net Operating Cash Flow: -A$12.5 million, compared to A$0.6 million positive in 1H FY24.
  • This reflects increased payments to suppliers and employees (A$63.9 million vs. A$45.3 million in 1H FY24).
  • Receipts from customers: A$44.3 million, up from A$41.1 million.
  • Receipts from BARDA reimbursements: A$7.3 million, up from A$5.1 million.
  • Net Investing Cash Flow: -A$4.5 million, compared to -A$0.5 million in 1H FY24.
  • Driven by increased capital expenditure of A$5.1 million (up 361.2% from A$1.1 million) for R&D and new facilities.
  • Net Financing Cash Flow: -A$2.2 million, compared to -A$1.4 million in 1H FY24.
  • Repayment of borrowings (A$1.9 million) and lease liabilities.
  • Cash & Cash Equivalents (End of Period): A$30.5 million, down from A$45.9 million at June 2024.
  • Key Driver: Increased investments in infrastructure, R&D, and sales expansion.


Operational and Strategic Developments

  • NovoSorb MTX Launch: Achieved A$2.1 million in sales following a successful U.S. launch in Q4 2024.
  • Pipeline Expansion: Introduced new sizes and thicknesses for NovoSorb BTM and NovoSorb MTX.
  • Hernia Repair & Plastic Mesh Development: Pre-clinical stage initiated for new medical applications.
  • Full-Thickness Burns Clinical Trial (BARDA Supported): Achieved enrollment of 120 patients, paving the way for FDA engagement on potential paediatric burn treatment.
  • Manufacturing Expansion: Construction commenced for a new facility in Port Melbourne (Operational by December 2025).
  • Innovation Centre: Finalised design, with opening planned for June 2025.


Key Financial Metrics

  • BARDA Revenue: A$5.4 million, up 10.2% from A$4.9 million.
  • Capital Expenditure: A$5.1 million, up 361.2% from A$1.1 million, reflecting investment in R&D and infrastructure.
  • Research & Development (R&D) Expenditure: A$5.1 million, up 3.8% from A$4.9 million.
  • Employee Growth: Workforce increased to 282 employees, up 19.0% from 237 in 1H FY24.


Market & Growth Strategy

  • Market Penetration: Focus on expanding U.S. market share, taking business from established competitors.
  • Rest of World Growth: Increased procedure and market development efforts in Europe, the UK, and Ireland.
  • Innovation & Expansion: Developing solutions for trauma, reconstructive surgery, and general surgical applications.


Disc: Not Held

Parko5
Added 2 months ago

24 Feb 2025 H1FY25 Preso


The new motto is “Go slow to go fast….to scale”. Not sure I like this. I know in the medical field….this is a good thing. But for investors, I’m not sure that is the type of language that should be used. Can anyone suggest any better slogans?


Also good to see that David Williams not only puts his money where his mouth is, he puts his product where his nose is! Well done!


My takeaway points:

 - They seemed annoyed with the market response to the 29% Growth for RoW.

 - But I didn’t hear any really good answers, except that they will continue to take market share and grow. 

 - Jan did say that sales to distributors can be lumpy. Germany and Ireland for example. And this happened with some of the sales falling outside of the reporting period. So it can an affect/distort like for like YOY. If this is the case, tell us!!!

 - Swami at the end said “Growth rate moving forward….25% compounded annually can be expected….however, any new disruptors could change that…”

 - They did push the new products more than I remember in last meetings. Said that implantable will be in the market by 2026. Should we start to factor these revenues into our models?

 - India seemed like much harder work than they were expecting. I think it will be 2-3 years before we see decent revenue from India. 

 - The discussion on Europe was interesting, but as they say it was lumpy growth between countries. 

 - Barda result early 2026 (maybe a chance of being earlier…)…Barda revenue to tapper off with the program winding down. 

 - Increase in revenue YoY is due to: 4% is price, 88% growth and 8% new products.

 - I was encouraged by what the CFO (Jan) said “in long run…burns will be the icing on the cake….the rest of their product uses will be larger.” 

 - New Markets - Japan and China seem to be the focus. Japan sounds progressed. China is really only at the very beginning. 

 - USA market - lots of discussion about how there is much more addressable market there (gaining market share, but also new uses and new products.)

 - Tariffs should be ok because they have 1 year supply already in USA. And have high margin. And Barda were talking to them about building manufacturing in USA. Early days in the discussions. 

 - Employee costs have gone up a little because they have filled in some senior positions, and they are ‘investing a little ahead of the curve’ for some new products [I think that is what was said]. 



Other considerations:

 - Shorts have gone up quite a bit. 

 - I know some of the chartists here have been seeing some interesting trading patterns and movements. But where is the bottom!

 - General market sentiment feels low


What will I do:

 - I feel better about the long term growth opportunities

 - Didn’t quite like the way they sold it to us. 

 - But synthetic products just seem better to the biologics….plus the use cases/new products will eventually start to add to revenue.

 - So long term I think it is a safe investment

 - But given the market….I think the SP could drop further. 


I’m still digesting what what said…so my above opinions might change….



19

mikebrisy
Added 2 months ago

@Parko5 it is a good summary of the call. But ......

I want to state up front, that because I now am no longer a holder, my negative bias is probably going to come through but ... it is what it is.

Too much of what Swami and Jan said has an air of "trust me" about it. My question is, did you notice the change in David's demeanour. I think you could watch the presentation on mute, just looking at him and that would say it all. He has never, in my recollection, ever allowed the CEO to lead a presentation.

Because I don't believe or can't verify a lot of what was said, I have to go by the numbers. And below is one chart that sums up my reservations. It is a plot of the cashflows for the last three 1H periods.

This is why I have been adamant about one element in my thesis, consistently since I started following $PNV in 2018. High revenue growth is key. They need high revenue growth at their high margins to drive the business forward and justify the multiple.

Even today it is on an EV/Revenue multiple of 9x (albeit before the downgrades come in), and that compares with 2.8 ($AVH), 2.4 ($ARX) and 2.0 ($IART). It is a horrible metric to make a comparion on, but the difference is stark. And now, what is the justification for it?

Swami said he believes they can achieve revenue growth of 25%, absent something disruptive happening. OK. But given where they are, its going to be hard to get the mutliple justified by today's SP with 25% growth when $AVH's 2025 forecast growth is more like 57% (wait a minute, that's where $PNV used to be).

When challenged on cashflows, they variously blamed collections in the US and winter storms. (Where have I heard that one before? oh yeah, $ACAD for DAYBUE presciptions last winter.) But these aren't concentrated accounts trapped by one snow-bound hospital or one frozen Accounts Receivable Offivcer . They are many hundreds of accounts right across America, and they've NEVER before reported an issue with collections. So what,... all of a sudden US hospitals have stopped payinf their bills? (I must have missed that Executive Order. And Kennedy wasn't in post in the reporting period).

And on new products,... it all sounded very optimistic. I wouldn't be putting any of it in my models just yet. And even when approved, did you hear Swami rattling off the list of competing products already in the market!

No, everything I heard today convinced me that this is one to watch from the sidelines.

I've probably invested more time in understanding this company, its products, its competitors and its markets than any other business in the last 8 years. I wanted to hear a presentation, a story and a set of numbers that gave me comfort to invest again, at a knocked down price.

I didn't hear that story or see those numbers.

Don't get me wrong, I still believe its products are great, that it will grow and over time new products will come to market and new indications will be approved. (An approval for FTB from the BARDA trial could be a significant SP catalyst in early 2026).

But from here, I don't see this as an attractive investment.

I can't wait to see the analyst updates!

Disc: Not held


Figure 1: 1H Cash Flows

1c5cbffc49f6d1f00f2387ad831072fb41a9ea.png


28

Parko5
Added 2 months ago

@mikebrisy

Agree with everything you said.

It did feel like a "trust us" type dialogue.

And I was amazed by David Williams attitude too. He barely said anything.


BUT - what would you value their buisnes at? I think this correction might be over done.

If we do assume 25% growth rate of BTM/MTX and no other products......(and I don't have time today to run models)...so i am guessing that is about a SP of about $2.

What price would you become a buyer?


(i'll try and have a look at modelling the above tonight - final week before my wife has a baby...so lots to do!)

16

Parko5
Added 2 months ago

Also - PNV is currently trading at $1.51 and falling fast!!!

11

mikebrisy
Added 2 months ago

He’s smart enough to know a lot of his capital was about to drain away, with no clear road back.

On valuation, Im not sure. If I run just off the financials, then $1.50 is probably good value. But the cash flows have really thrown me. So it’s a simple case of not having to own it at any price. For now. Maybe ever.

19

Rick
Added 2 months ago

Ye of little faith @mikebrisy. Sorry, I’m feeling a bit cheeky today and I couldn’t resist the payback! However, full credit for picking the sell point. There’s probably plenty of time to buy back in! Well done sir!

12

mikebrisy
Added 2 months ago

Hi @Rick good to hear from you and hope last week went well for you.

There are several surprises for me: 1) why the market didn't react immediately on the result, 2) why the bottom didn't fall out further during the investor call and 3) that Bell Potter only cut their PT by 6.7% to $2.80.

Being right on this one holds no joy for me. Not many months ago, it was one of my strongest conviction stocks. But if ever I needed a positive reinforcement not to get emotionally attached to any stock, then this is it.

Of course, it is entirely possible that several adverse things all line up at the same time in this period, and that we'll see a reversion in the next periods to something a little more decent. But from my perspective that is hopeful thinking, and I can't put money on that.

I even wonder how strong Swami's conviction in 25% p.a. for ever is. The change in momentum being so strong.

$IART report later today (11:30pm AEST). I won't stay up for it, but it will be my first read in the morning.

17

Rick
Added 2 months ago

Thanks @mikebrisy. My surgery went really well on Friday avo, albeit delayed, which did not help my anxiety levels! Three days later as I sit at home on the sorest part of my anatomy, I am feeling grateful for all the advancements in modern medicine (eg. Robotic surgery, pathology, PET scans, the huge suite of pharmaceuticals). Sometimes it takes something like this to make you appreciate the most important things in life! :)

18

mikebrisy
Added 2 months ago

So glad to hear it. And all the best with the recovery and continued progress.

I can't agreed with you more. I had a near death experience when I was 17 years old. In some ways, it was the best thing that ever happened to me, because every day since then I considered it as "extra time". Whenever things aren't going well for me, I just cast my mind back to the feeling I had when I realised I had another chance.

22