Forum Topics FDA Staff Cut (19%)
Superfluous
Added 4 months ago

This may be a sign of things to come:

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/fda-approves-therapy-rare-disease-without-randomized-trial-data

10
Tom73
Added 8 months ago

Article on the issue from Endpoints:

Makes me think of socialist purges in Russia when the Reds took over...


April 1, 2025 08:00 AM EDTUpdated 04:18 PM PeopleFDA+

Firings sweep across FDA as former leaders lament the gutting of drug agency

Zachary Brennan

Senior Editor

Mass firings and forced resignations swept through the FDA on Tuesday, as part of thousands of planned job cuts at federal health agencies being implemented by the Trump administration.


Some employees who showed up to work at the FDA’s main White Oak campus on Tuesday found out they had been fired when they attempted to check in at security, only to find out that their badges no longer worked and their jobs were gone. They were then escorted by security to collect their belongings. The scenes were described to Endpoints News by several people who witnessed them, and requested anonymity.


Others, such as CDER Office of New Drugs Director Peter Stein, were offered a new, hastily created role in a different department — or the choice to quit.


“I was offered a reassignment’ in ‘patient affairs’ (as they were required to do) or termination (after admin leave). I declined the offer (as ridiculous) so am on administrative leave,” Stein said in an email to Endpoints.


“The FDA as we’ve known it is finished,” said Robert Califf, the commissioner under the Biden administration who has emerged as a strident critic of the Trump administration’s efforts to gut the agency. “I will be glad if I’m proven wrong.”


And Scott Gottlieb, who served as commissioner under the previous Trump administration, warned that the cuts would lead to a return to a period of slower drug approvals and less access to new technology.


“The cumulative barrage on that drug-discovery enterprise, threatens to swiftly bring back those frustrating delays for American consumers, particularly affecting rare diseases and areas of significant unmet medical need,” said Gottlieb, who now serves as an investor and a board member at Pfizer and Illumina, in a post on X (formerly known as Twitter).


Biotech stocks fell for a second day in a row, with the S&P Biotech ETF $XBI down 1.3%, while the broader market was up.


Additional firings and unit changes Endpoints was able to confirm with sources include:


FDA chief medical officer Hilary Marston; the office of the chief medical officer was fired as well

Deep cuts at FDA’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion, which regulates drug ads

Deep cuts at FDA’s Office of Manufacturing Quality, which protects the public from adulterated drugs and ensures compliance with good manufacturing practices

Cuts to CBER’s immuno-oncology staff

Communications, public affairs, policy and FOIA staff

Endpoints attempted to reach the FDA for comment, only to find out from sources that the agency’s office of media affairs and the office of communications had also suffered deep cuts.


The moves are part of a sweeping and sudden transformation of an agency that will see 3,500 FDA staffers — 19% of the agency — depart. Already, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has pushed out one of the agency’s highest-profile leaders, biologics center chief Peter Marks. Other senior staff working in cancer drugs and biologics have left or been forced out as well, Endpoints reported Monday.


Kennedy announced the planned firings last week, describing them as an effort aimed at “streamlining HHS to make our agency more efficient and more effective.” But the staff eliminations are almost certain to be disruptive to healthcare product reviews, given the elimination of senior leaders at the FDA whose careers encompass decades of experience. On Tuesday, he posted on X that “The revolution begins today!” and officially announced the swearing-in of new FDA Commissioner Marty Makary.


Empty hallways, gutted divisions

FDA staff who spoke with Endpoints described the scene at the agency headquarters as a “bloodbath” that had left remaining employees in shock in the empty hallways. There were few, if any, communications from agency leadership — including Makary — about who had been cut and what the firings would mean for the agency’s operations moving forward.


The firings include whole offices at the regulator, multiple FDA sources told Endpoints, including leadership and administrative staff in several departments.


Similar firings were happening Tuesday across other federal health agencies, with some senior leaders given a choice to relocate to remote, rural offices with the Indian Health Service, or to Alaska, according to the Washington Post.


Reached for comment, an HHS spokesperson pointed Endpoints to a statement issued last week that contained few details, and didn’t respond to specific questions about the FDA cuts.


Editor’s note: This story has been updated throughout with new details on the cuts.

11

Clio
Added 8 months ago

Scary. What I want to know is whether, as one commentator above believed, this will lead to long delays in approvals of new drugs and treatments...or whether drug approval will be "streamlined" instead. Possibly for a larger fee, but a much faster - and less safe - process. Just box-ticking by people who don't really know what they should be looking for or are willing to accept what companies tell them at face value.

I can't imagine Big Pharma will be happy either way. They have a lot at stake if the approval process gets easier for smaller companies without their deep pockets for funding large trials and just as much at risk if the whole process falls in a heap.

14

Tom73
Added 8 months ago

Yes @Clio , very scary.

The RF Kennedy BS factory is now at full production - streamlining would be great - if done right.

I would bet everything I had on the reality being it's a hack job done by people who have no idea how the FDA works (or medicine/health system in general) and the outcome will be a disaster. As you put it, either a pay for dodgy approval or log jam that sets back health outcomes years and possibly decades!

I am sure there are lots of improvements and efficiencies that could occur in the FDA, but that is not the aim. They are just setting the place on fire and letting the flames decide what stays and goes - it is nothing short of an attempt to totally disable the FDA by ideologs who don't accept science when it does agree with what they want.

13

mikebrisy
Added 8 months ago

@Tom73 @Clio I guess the impact in the medium to longer term depends on what happens from here.

A poorly directed 19% hatchet job will cause a disproportionate short term disruption, But if after that, the organisation is competently managed, then you'd expect some of the initial loss of capacity to be restored. Over a period of >6 months or so, you might find the degradation in performance to be a lot less than the -19% implies. Processes will be streamlined, there will be cataytic effect among "survivors", other efficiencies might be found. It won't necessarily lead to any significant change in the qualities or values or professionalism of those remaining in the shrunk Agency.

What will matter is the changes at the top. Who are new leaders, what are their values, behaviours, targets and incentives? I think we know little about that at this stage.

In a former life, I have been part of inflicting hatchet jobs on several large organisations in several industries. In some cases, over time, organisation effectiveness improved, in others it was arguably degraded. Of course, in each case the changes were preceeded by a lot of analysis and leadership deliberation. Which doesn't seemt to tbe the case with DOGE.

Understandably, the market is marking a lot of stocks with FDA-approval exposure down today, but I think it will take some time for the impacts to be understood.

13

lastever
Added 4 months ago

For anyone interested in pharma and biotech, there are indications of an FDA bottleneck. Neurizon (NUZ) expected FDA feedback on a relatively simple animal data review this month (after a standard 30 day review period) but last week the FDA guided them to expect a 5 week delay to early October.

For context, the trial drug continues to be trialled in Australia, but has been under FDA clinical hold due to an unexpected request for further animal safety data.

Neurizon has held up well after this small setback. The clinical hold initially hit hard but cumulative patient data since then has looked good and shareholders have recovered confidence that this FDA delay will be resolved and is simply a bureaucratic issue. The patient population for ALS are desperate for promising treatments to be trialled, and so will likely advocate for a speedy completion.

14