Forum Topics PWH PWH Management

Pinned straw:

Added 7 months ago

Get well soon Kees.


PWR Founder and Managing Director Takes Medical Leave

PWR’s Managing Director and Founder, Kees Weel, is taking temporary leave from his full-time role to seek treatment for an

acute medical condition. PWR’s Executive Leadership Team will assume Kees Weel’s day-to-day responsibilities, with Chief

Technical and Commercial Officer, Matthew Bryson, appointed by the Board to the role of Acting CEO.


Kees Weel said, “While I will remain active in PWR’s overall direction, I have advised the Board that concentrating on my

recovery is my priority. Matthew Bryson and the Executive Leadership Team have my full support, and I have complete faith that they will be able to deliver on PWR’s objectives and the move to PWR’s new headquarters, which has successfully commenced.”

PWR’s Chairman, Roland Dane said, “The Board supports Kees in his decision to focus on his health and wishes him all the best for his recovery. We look forward to welcoming him back when he is ready.”

About Matthew Bryson

Matthew joined PWR in 2000 as a design and manufacturing engineer contributing to PWR’s formative years across product and production engineering responsibilities. This role progressed to the position of Engineering Manager at PWR, as a position held

for 15 years, working closely with PWR’s customers to grow the business, and overseeing the continued development of PWR’s product and advanced manufacturing capabilities. In July 2020, Matthew commenced the position of Chief Operating Officer at

PWR, before taking on his current role of Chief Technical and Commercial Officer in August 2021 to support the future growth of PWR.

Remuneration details for Matthew Bryson are summarised below:

Length of Contract Open ended

Notice Period 6 months

Total Fixed Remuneration $420,300

Additional Remuneration for Acting CEO role $220,000

Short Term Incentive Plan Participation Up to 50% of Total Fixed Remuneration

Long Term Incentive Plan Participation Up to 50% of Total Fixed Remuneration

Matthew Bryson Sharyn Williams

Acting CEO Chief Financial Officer

+61 7 5547 1600 +61 7 5547 1600

occy
Added 7 months ago

Well this news gives me pause for thought. I'm yet to own PWR but added it to my watchlist late last year when the stock price took a large hit when vendors were cancelling contracts for some of their electric vehicle projects. I missed that this pretty much touched the $6 mark.


On current multiples it is expensive but it had an appalling year and this can also partially be put down to those downgrades plus upheavel with their investment in a larger facility plus the addition of a large amount of staff. Tariffs are a bit of an unknown but they do and have a growing manufacturing venture in the USA that supplies their American clients so may not be an issue anyhow. They have an array of projects with huge growth potential especially in the defence sector that can pick up any slack from their current problems so appears to be temporary and not terminal. They can definitely grow into their multiple but does the news with Weel change anything or slow the turnaround, likely not.


I'm just spitballing here trying to convince myself when/if a good time to buy would be. I feel PWH can run up in price quickly before any firm official announcements in respect to upgrades in guidance and you can miss a price that we may never see again. For a company with solid long-term potential I think I've convinced myself to buy next week and am happy to ride out an further volatility in the short term as could be a nice winner in 5+ years time irrespective of the unfortunate news on Weel's health.


19

BoredSaint
Added 7 months ago

If it makes your decision any easier, there's been lots of director buying in the last few weeks which may have pushed the share price up from the low $6 to the current price.

Disc: Held IRL and on Strawman.

17

Solvetheriddle
Added 7 months ago

@occy yeah two strategies (ok there are maybe more), buy it when there is bad news because you believe it is below intrinsic value and wait through, in this case several more negative items, and lower SP, and be patient OR wait for a positive turn in events and then buy, realising you wont pick the bottom (who can?), but hopefully get in at still a good value. the way momentum investing and sentiment work in the market these days, the second one is usually safer, but in this game, there are no guarantees.

im a modest holder and riding the waves. So I'm a buy some and watch. The positive is that the damage does not appear to be in the core business.

24

thunderhead
Added 6 months ago

An eye-catching double digit drop on yet another bright green day for the index. What gives?

11

Bear77
Added 6 months ago

Daily Trade Volumes are listed below from recent trading days TH:

0379ecfb839ae9877c0c2f7082320f8085d48c.png

And today is greater volume (so far) than all of those days except for May 29th. So higher than usual volume of trades.

22d0645394c9e46360fdc536d5312842fdb571.png

If you held a gun to my head, my best guess would be that one of the Subs listed below are reducing their exposure and the low liquidity is causing the price to move substantially as a result of those sells:

a6205e7ce28e2639282b632743a06dd576d551.png

If I'm right, we should see a "Change of..." or "Ceasing..." notice from the relevant Substantial Holder during the next three days.


Disc: Not held.

19

Bushmanpat
Added 6 months ago

ASX price query letter sent and returned with nothing to see here response.


11

Karmast
Added 6 months ago

Hopefully a good chance to top up at attractive prices, taking advantage of a short term thinker who is exiting with too much of the avg daily trade. One of the advantages we "retail investors" have over the big guys...

16

thunderhead
Added 6 months ago

I was thinking along the same lines @Bear77. I also heard that brokers are speculating on index exclusion.

If either of those reasons hold water, this may be an opportunity.

15

Bear77
Added 6 months ago

Could be both TH - could be that a Sub is selling out because of an expected index removal. If you own a decent chunk of a low liquidity microcap it's hard to exit without disturbing the share price, and the lower the liquidity, the more substantial the disturbance is likely to be.

14

edgescape
Added 6 months ago

Noticed Australian super there in the list for pwr. Possible there could be a proportion that are member direct contributions.

8

Bear77
Added 6 months ago

No doubt some are @edgescape however the sort of sell down we saw a couple of days ago was coordinated selling by a Sub or decent sized holder IMO. It could be a combination of both. If you have a look at the Subs notices from AustralianSuper, there's usually loads of small volume trades on almost a daily basis over weeks and months, that's a clear sign that those trades are members' trades, whereas much higher volume on particular days could be AustralianSuper's own fund managers adjusting their own positions, although in my experience AustralianSuper's fund managers don't usually invest in anything below the ASX200, and this one is in the 300 but not the 200, so I would imagine it's AustralianSuper's "Member Direct" members that hold the shares - but in AustralianSuper's name.

AustralianSuper are Australia's largest super fund and they manage over $365 billion on behalf of over 3.5 million members. Their website's home page says they've been ranked among the top 20 largest pension funds globally - so they are a big fund - one of the largest in the world. So if just 1 in 7 of their 3.5 million members uses their "Member Direct" option to choose their own ASX300 companies to directly invest some of their super into, that's half a million Australians, and so there are always going to be a percentage of those half a million that are going to choose PWR Holdings (PWH.asx) as one of their choices for direct investment. It's why AustralianSuper crop up so often as Subs for ASX300 companies, especially ones in the 200 to 300 range (the lower third of the ASX300) where the market caps are lower and building a 5% (Substantial Holder) position isn't as difficult as it is with larger companies.

14