Forum Topics ARX ARX March 25 quarterly

Pinned straw:

Added 7 months ago

This morning ARX released and presented their March Quarterly Update:

ARX maintained their FY25 sales guidance of NZ$81 - $84m.

Reported positive cash flow for the quarter of NZ$1.1.m and cash of NZ$22m.

Myriad sales were up 11% from prior quarter and up 32% from prior year.

Ovitex CY 24 US sales of $69m up 19% on CY23 up 17% on previous corresponding period

Followers of the stock will know the Ovitex sales are about half total sales, and are exclusively undertaken by Telabio in the US. This relationship with Tela can be looked at as a potential weakness for ARX, given Tela losing money for many years and continues to do so.

I asked CEO Brian Ward about the poor Tela quarterly results released on the 21/3/25, including the loss of a significant number sales staff due to resignations and sackings and fierce competition. (This appeared to at odds with ARX reporting a 17% increase in Ovitex sales from the previous corresponding period.)  

Brian responded with:  “I would not see it as bleak as that…..” and went on to say, (as you might expect) that he expected good growth in Ovitex sales, up from the previous year and expected continued growth over the next 12 months.  The CFO went on to say without providing further sales numbers, Tela sales were soft in the December quarter, March quarter was strong and next quarter was going well.

Overall Summation: Higher Myriad and Ovitex sales, ARX being cash flow positive and having $22m in the bank are big positives.  ARX appears to be making progress in billing code reimbursement for the Myriad product and ongoing clinical evidence trials.  

Questions still remain about the ongoing viability of Tela and implications for Ovitex sales. The market liked what it heard, at one point pushing up the share 10%. There is some comfort knowing ARX is unlikely to go broke. Though whether ARX ever ends up with sufficient earnings in this very competitive medical product segment to justify its $160m market cap is anyone’s guess. 

rh8178
Added 7 months ago

Thanks for the commentary @mikebrisy and @Scoonie - agree with both. From my perspective, it's a positive that they've now had sequential FCF - it's only 2 quarters (so not too excited yet), but it definitely bucks the trend of previous comparable periods. I like the balance sheet, and if Tela did become problematic, at least there is some cash to weather a storm. Hoping they could maybe go direct if Tela does fall off a cliff (could even be an acquisition opportunity). I should also add, you've got to be careful on valuation on this one - obviously everything is quoted in $NZ, except the market cap which is AUD so convert first before making comparisons on prices.

Held IRL.

8
mikebrisy
Added 7 months ago

@Scoonie has succintly captured the key points. So, I'll just support his remarks on the challenge $ARX is facing by updating my usual cash flows trend chart.

The fitted, dotted lines are for the last 8Q only, and there is good positive overall trend towards cash generation.

However, it has been a tortuous journey to breaking through to neutral cashflow, and it looks like the trajectory might be flattening, which obviously a straightline fit cannot show.

The second chart showing Trailing 12 Month measures (TTM) I think paints the picture more clearly.

My narrative for this industry segment is that as the multiple dermal repair players scale their various products at a rates(15%-50%) significantly above the overall segment growth (c. 10%), and towards annual revenues up to and beyond $100m, competitive challenges continue to intensify. That is the competitive backdrop that means I've lost conviction as to the future earnings trajectory in $PNV, my previously favoured pick.

e56123bd56febf3c1bb78b612bb9d9efa6a1c7.png

ba47ba93856eea39b9ae6aedd8082f708800cb.png


Disc: Not held

14

Scoonie
Added 7 months ago

 mikebrisy  great graphs that nicely illustrate the tough market ARX is in.  

Back in the March quarterly conference call, an under pressure Telabio CEO Antony Koblish said, when being asked to explain the ruins that was/is Tela’s sales force: “Our products are not at the stage where they sell themselves”. Which asks a further question: If Ovitex is so superior why does it need to be continually pushed by a highly incentivised sales staff?  One conclusion is that all these biologic or artificial dermal matrix’s do a task pretty much as well as each other. And aside from the commentary from the surgeons who pop up as a particular product champion, maybe there is little real difference in patient outcomes.   Possibly Avita is differentiated and has something that is unique and superior in its particular field.  

It is hard to see a specific catalyst that will cause ARX (or PNV) to re-rate.    I think the investor message is sell ARX buy BOT.

Scoonie’s feeble brain is maxed out handling Year 3 arithmetic. However he can just piece together from yesterday's Matt Callaghan/Strawman BOT interview there is potentially a faeces-load to be made in BOT.  Buy BOT, and hope there is not a Healthcare reformer in the new US administration with more power and understanding than what appears to be a head-in-his-rectum anti-vaxer, Mr Kennedy.  It is hoped Howie can keep skillfully steering the BOT bus towards Rortsville, and BOT will be able to bot off the US healthcare system for a while longer.  Just as well Scoonie is largely unconcerned with ethical investing.   

14

Schwerms
Added 7 months ago

@Scoonie you have hit the nail on the head.

Bot is already largely derisked as well I feel due to the numbers done by Kaken pharma with the weaker Ecclock version over the last 4 years and now we can see some early traction

Don't call it a rort haha it's technical term is continuity of care which is great for the patient and shareholder.

Disc held IRL and strawman

7