Forum Topics CAT CAT Bull Case

Pinned straw:

Added 7 months ago

The value prop for Catapult is pretty straightforward: it lets sports teams turn performance data into competitive advantage. At the top levels of professional sport, decisions are increasingly data-driven (see: Moneyball). Player load, tactical strategy, and return-to-play timelines can make or break seasons, and there are millions of dollars on the line. Pro sports is big business.

Catapult’s platform (built on wearables, video, and analytics) gives teams the ability to monitor athlete performance in real time, analyze tactical execution, and optimize player development with objectivity and precision. For sports organizations managing multi-million-dollar athlete assets, this kind of insight isn’t just helpful, it’s essential. And it’s increasingly being recognized as such.

Catapult is both a leader and pioneer in this space. Its clients include the NFL, Premier League, Bundesliga, F1, NCAA, and numerous national governing bodies. It is at least 5x the the size of its nearest competitor (Statsports). That dominance matters because scale fuels significant network effects: as more departments across a team adopt Catapult’s tools, workflows embed, data libraries expand, and switching costs rise. Over time, Catapult becomes not just a tool, but essential infrastructure.

This stickiness is reflected in an average customer tenure of around six years and a steadily rising ACV per team. More customers mean more data, which improves the product, which attracts more customers -- it's a classic flywheel. Scale also funds a superior R&D budget, strengthening the company’s moat. Crucially, Catapult owns the data it helps generate. When players transfer between teams, those teams want the data too, which makes adoption by one club a catalyst for adoption by others.

The market opportunity is pretty sizeable. Catapult currently serves around 3,500 professional teams, which management estimates to be just 30–35% of the global addressable market. The goal is to reach 5,000 teams over the medium term. Importantly, there’s still major upside within the existing customer base: only 27% of teams currently use more than one product, meaning the majority are ripe for cross-sell.

This reflects Catapult’s deliberate “land and expand” strategy. The business typically enters with its elite wearables (Performance & Health), then grows through video and analytics (Tactics & Coaching). This model seems to be working, with multi-vertical customers growing 32% in FY24.

Financially, the company’s profile has improved significantly since the current CEO Will Lopes took over. It has completed its SaaS transition, with 92% of revenue now recurring. ACV reached US$86.8 million in FY24, up 20% YoY (constant currency), with retention of 96.5%. Gross margin hit 81%, and contribution margin expanded to 46%, up from 34% a year earlier. Free cash flow turned positive for the first time, hitting $4.6 million (a $26 million turnaround from the prior year) while more or less holding costs flat.

Catapult is now Rule of 40 compliant, combining strong growth with positive margins. And it seems to have done so without unsustainable incentives or pricing tactics. The business is also relatively insulated from macroeconomic cycles; pro sports remains in demand across all market environments, and performance tech is becoming a non-negotiable investment.

Looking ahead, the company has set clear medium-term targets. It aims to grow to 5,000 pro teams, reach 50% multi-vertical penetration, keep ACV retention above 95%, and hit a 30% Management EBITDA margin. It plans to achieve this by keeping variable costs below 45% of revenue and fixed costs (G&A and R&D) under 25%. Execution against these benchmarks is starting to show: Catapult moved from -13% Rule of 40 in FY23 to 31% in 1H FY25.

Taken together, this is a business with product-market fit, durable customer relationships, strong financial fundamentals, and a clear path to scale. Catapult is a global category leader solving a critical problem in an industry that’s only becoming more analytical and performance-obsessed. It has proven it can grow, and now (finally) it’s proving it can do so profitably, with operating leverage and strategic clarity.

Will Lopes has flagged a long-term target of reaching US$1 billion in ACV, though without a defined timeline. Since adopting the subscription model, Catapult has grown ACV at a 23% CAGR. Assuming a slightly lower 20% going forward, the business would hit US$1 billion in ACV by FY38 -- about 13 years from now.

Assuming ACV approximates revenue at that point, and that management delivers on its 30% EBITDA margin target, Catapult would be generating around US$300 million in EBITDA in FY38. Applying a 12x multiple -- which is about standardfor mature, high-quality SaaS companies -- you get a US$3.6 billion terminal value. Discounted back at 10% per year, this equates to a present value of US$1.04 billion.

Assume the share count grows at 5% annually, reaching ~470 million shares by FY38. Using a 0.63 USD/AUD exchange rate, this implies a per-share value today of around A$3.51.

That's below the current market price, but I'm hesitant to lift it much further given it's already based on some bullish assumptions. At the same time, i'm not looking to sell down as the market price is still in the ball park of value and I try not to overthink valuation when the underlying business quality is high and the prospects for sustained growth seem decent.

jcmleng
Added 7 months ago

@Strawman , very nice summary!

One point to clarify though:

Crucially, Catapult owns the data it helps generate. When players transfer between teams, those teams want the data too, which makes adoption by one club a catalyst for adoption by others.

From my notes in the conversation with then CFO Hayden Stockdale back in 2023, do not believe this statement is correct:

DATA OWNERSHIP

  • Data is owned by the team’s
  • CAT has the right to use the data to improve its algorithms on an anonymous basis
  • Teams do not have the right to monetise the data without CAT consent - this is to ensure that monetisation is not used in a way which competes with CAT
  • Data is not interesting to a 3rd party unless it is for the whole league - teams are more interested in winning, it is the leagues that are more interested in the data as they care about eyeballs, fan engagement etc


My other thoughts on data:

  • I can't see why team A selling player X to team B would hand over historical player data to Team B, even if both were on the CAT platform, from a commercial standpoint - they would be giving up player insights that would presumably give up whatever competitive advantage they had from player X to an opposing team - that doesnt quite make sense to me
  • Even if the data was handed over, it assumes that the data is somehow meaningful, and useable, by team B - I don't think this is a safe assumption to make at all and I have not seen it come up in any CAT commentary (I am consciously looking out for all things data!).
  • While on the same CAT platform, same software, same functionality, each team must, almost by definition, configure the CAT platform to its workflows, to its own data needs - external data gnerated from another CAT system may either not work in Team B's platform as-is, without a lot of conversion work - if this is technically possible (and it should be, given the same platform), the question then becomes what is the value of having that historical data, generated and captured from a totally different team environment, under completely different team circumstances, when the player was younger, had different roles in the team etc


Having being a "data guy" in my past life, a controversial statement this might be, my view is that historical data as a "raw-form thing" is almost completely overated, especially when the data is removed from its source system and plonked somewhere else (assuming that it is technically and effort-wise,viable) ...

Discl: Held IRL and in SM

39

Strawman
Added 7 months ago

oh, yeah I believe you're right re ownership @jcmleng. And now you say that I do remember you mentioning it. Thanks for the correction!

Also, great insights on data in general. Very much appreciated.

24

thunderhead
Added 7 months ago

Excellent content @Strawman and @jcmleng. Thank you!

12

thunderhead
Added 7 months ago

They are formidable in their industry, but don't they have competition from the likes of STATSports, Sportradar and Hudl which may limit the extent of their pricing power?

16

mushroompanda
Added 7 months ago

Sportsradar is a sports betting data and software company - like RTH and BET on the ASX.

Hudl is video only and doesn't have wearables.

STATSports is probably the closest like for like. Video heritage and they do have wearables. Not really sure which teams and leagues uses the hardware product - something I'll need to do more research. Looking at their product page I can already see it's not as professionally focused as CAT's - there's no integrated heart-rate monitoring in the bra top (requires seperate chest strap device), no dock to manage the devices for the whole team, etc. STATSports is probably the company CAT believes they have a 5x lead over in P&H.

925ec7af74ceae5b2f1e6cc7376c9583dd7736.png

22

mikebrisy
Added 7 months ago

@mushroompanda, yes we've discussed Statsports here before. Privately held, Irish origin, I think.

Interestingly, the All Blacks dropped $CAT a few years ago for Statsports, and I've also seem them on Wrexham AFC ("Welcome to Wrexham"), as they are quite embedded in the English FA.

I think Statsport offered their product free to the All Blacks,, to get them to swtich fropm $CAT, presumably as a loss leader, in an attempt to take over more premier teams in that code from $CAT.

And, yes, I can confirm that STATSports is the nearest competitor. Here's a quick profile from my BA (ChatGPT) on STATSports.

My considered view is that as long as $CAT stays close to their customers, and invests in customer-led innovation in the big money codes, then STATSports is unlikely to close the gap, unless someone with very deep pockets gets behind them for a sustained effort.

-----------------------------------------

PROFILE (by ChatGPT4.0)

STATSports is a leading sports technology company specializing in wearable GPS tracking and performance analysis systems for elite athletes and teams across various sports.Tracxn+14STATSports+14IFA+14

Origins and Growth


Founded in 2008 in Newry, Northern Ireland, by Alan Clarke and Sean O’Connor, STATSports began with the vision of providing fitness testing equipment to teams with smaller budgets. Recognizing a gap in the market, they developed tailored solutions to meet the specific needs of coaches and sports scientists. This approach led to the creation of advanced GPS tracking devices, notably the Viper and APEX systems, which have become integral tools for performance monitoring in professional sports. Tracxn+2Industry-Era+2The Business of Sport+2sportstechireland.comSTATSports+3STATSports+3STATSports+3

Over the years, STATSports has expanded its global footprint, establishing offices in Ireland, London, Chicago, and Florida. The company's commitment to innovation has positioned it as a world leader in GPS player tracking and analysis equipment.assist-software.net+13STATSports+13fs-ventures.co.uk+13

Major Client Base


STATSports boasts an impressive roster of clients spanning multiple sports disciplines:

  • Soccer (Football): Top-tier clubs such as Manchester United, Manchester City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Paris Saint-Germain (PSG), and FC Barcelona utilize STATSports technology to monitor player performance and optimize training. IFA+7LinkedIn+7sportstechireland.com+7
  • Rugby: National teams including New Zealand's All Blacks, Ireland, England, and South Africa's Springboks have adopted STATSports systems to enhance player welfare and performance. statsports.com
  • American Football: NFL teams like the Carolina Panthers and the Washington Commanders employ STATSports solutions for real-time player tracking and analysis.
  • Basketball: The Chicago Bulls integrate STATSports technology into their training regimens to monitor athlete workload and prevent injuries. Growjo
  • National Federations: Organizations such as U.S. Soccer, the Football Association of Ireland (FAI), and the Irish Rugby Football Union (IRFU) rely on STATSports for comprehensive performance data across their teams. Industry-Era+17go.statsports.com+17statsports.com+17


STATSports' technology is also prevalent in other sports, including Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA) games, hockey, and athletics, demonstrating its versatility and broad applicability in the realm of sports performance analysis.

By providing accurate, real-time data on metrics like speed, distance, and player load, STATSports enables coaches and sports scientists to make informed decisions that enhance performance and reduce injury risk.

24