Forum Topics IPG IPG FY25 Earnings Guidance

Pinned straw:

Added 6 months ago

Following a surprising 12.5% fall on no news since the start of May, IPD came out today with a reduced FY25 earnings guidance. EBITDA was initially forecast at $49.8m and will now fall between $45.7-$46.3m (7.5% reduction).

Given that current market conditions are somewhat tight I'm not overly shocked to see a downgrade and am willing to cut management some slack given the long-term growth story is still intact, however the leaky share price drop seems to confirm earlier concerns on here about management behaviour / reliability.

The good news to takeaway from my perspective is that firstly, the order book is more or less unchanged, with $91.5m in backlog orders currently and secondly, data centre revenues have grown 25% on the pro-forma pcp. Should market conditions open up a little with the latest RBA rate cut, IPD seem well placed to continue strong growth in FY26.

Information from the release

• Revenue for FY25 is forecast to exceed the pcp (Pro Forma), with continued revenue growth forecasted across the core IPD business (+4.9% on the pcp), CMI’s Minto Plugs (+5.2% on the pro-forma pcp), and EX Engineering (+4.6% on the pro-forma pcp)

• CMI’s Cables (forecasted revenue -7.6% on the pro-forma pcp) remains affected by headwinds across its key end-market (Commercial Construction/Buildings), while Addelec (forecasted revenue -12.6% on the pcp) has experienced project delays

• Data Centre Revenues have grown 25% on the pro-forma pcp

• Order Backlog (as at mid-May 2025) remains elevated at $91.5m

• Gross Profit Margins have seen downward pressure as the order book transitions from daily trade to larger, more complex and competitive orders

• Operating Expenses as a % of Revenue has improved on successful completion of additional investment in the operating cost base, leaving the Group well placed to efficiently service future growth

• Cash flow conversion (before interest and tax outflows) is expected to remain above 100%, with the Board of Directors approving an additional $10m repayment of core debt

edgescape
Added 6 months ago

Thanks for the thoughts

I'm always intrigued how to check who is the trigger of this "leaky ship". Is it early investors, insiders, employees being awarded free shares or management?

Probably too late to sell for me

Haven't seen the latest webcast from bell potter so posting the link will help.

11
mikebrisy
Added 6 months ago

@Dangles I was just starting to write up my notes but you've covered it all. Interestingly, the updated numbers were pretty much where they were in my model.

Nationally, construction capex is pretty anaemic, so they are bound to suffer form that. In that context, the Addelec number isn't that surprising.

I think momentum is just dragging this one lower and lower, and I don't think the update is all that bad, certainly, given the recent SP fall I felt it has already more than fully baked in a softer cyclical short term.

Given the very large gap opening up to consensus, I will be interested to see how many analysts take the opportunity to downgrade as they follow the SP down!

It is closing on a forward P/E of 12. whereas something more in the range 16-18x is reasonable if you believe it will benefit from the long-term tailwinds of electrification and outperform overall industry growth (which I do).

I'm still prepared to take the long term view on this one. And I'm even thinking about increasing my position, although I will probably wait until momentum is working in the right direction again.

Held in RL and SM

14

Karmast
Added 6 months ago

@Dangles and @mikebrisy I like this business and I like the tailwinds it has. But I don't like or trust the CEO...

I've been following them for about 18 months now and every time I hear him speak or engage in Q&A there are lots of signs we have an untrustworthy or hubristic leader at the helm.

Yesterday he presented at the Bell Potter online event. The host of that event from Bell Potter wasn't a great MC. He was a bit nervous or stumbly. Yet at the start of the presentation Michael then made a joke about how there is a job for him at IPD Group if he needs it. I know it's only a joke but there's no way Buffett is offering an MC a job at Berkshire if he was like that!

And the share price drop since May has to leave you wondering on whether others knew the downgrade was coming ahead of time.

He sets off my hubris detector every time, so I'm happy to leave them in my parked file for now and hope there is a change of leader sometime in the future that's an upgrade.

That said it doesn't mean it mightn't still do well or that you shouldn't invest if you don't care about management behaviours as much as I do.







23

OxyBBear
Added 6 months ago

I'm with you on this @Karmast. I was a holder of this stock but I sold out after the precipitous fall from around $4.80 down to $4.00 on no news in November 2024 which was then followed by an underwhelming 1H25 earnings guidance which saw the stock fall even further to mid $3.50.

I was convinced there was a leak that the big end of town was aware of. That was enough for me to put IPG in the sin bin as I place a high emphasis on management and board integrity.

Now we have a similar situation where the stock was trading around $4.00 on the 9th May, only for it to fall nearly every single day and close at $3.46 on the 18th May, the day before the below consensus FY25 earnings update was announced to the market. Coincidence? I think not.

16

mikebrisy
Added 6 months ago

@Karmast and @OxyBBear clearly events prove that selling out at $4.00 (in @OxyBBear 's case) was a good thing.

However, I don't share your perspectives on management or the reasons for the SP movement. There are ample cases where a soft macro and momentum trading will pull a stock right back. In the case of $IPG, its advance in the two years after IPO to a P/E of 27 was on any reasonable basis unjustified. It has not yet demonstrated the quality of organic growth to justify that kind of rating, in my view.

However now, with a challenging macro leading to cyclically flat performance, it is not unreasonable that its forward P/E has fallen to 12.5x. I can totally get there without needing to point to insider trading to explain trends or linking it to concerns over the CEO. Michael Sainsbury has been CEO for 10 years, and significantly built this business from the legacy pre-IPO IPD Group. The strategy, the portfolio of businesses in the group, and what they've paid for the acqusitions, all make sense to me.

There's no doubt that he (Michael S) is an awkward communicator, and unfortunately falls into using "word salad" too often to explain things. But in the 1-2 years I've been following this business, I've haven't detected anything that ring alarms bells, or inconsistency in what he's said.

I still draw some comfort from the fact that Mohammed Yousseff - by far the largest insider on the management team - bought back almost $4,000,000 (admittedly that he'd sold earlier!) when the share price slide started in November.

Of course, I am not so blinkered as to ignore alerts, warnings and hunches from highly esteemed members of our community, and so of course I am alerted by these warnings. However, so far they are an insufficient basis for me to act.

I am going to observe how the business performs over the next year, and will act on the performance delivered.

20

OxyBBear
Added 6 months ago

There are ample cases where a soft macro and momentum trading will pull a stock right back. 

@mikebrisy Yes I agree but the fall in share price itself isn't the trigger for my suspiciousness, it is the fact that a negative earnings update followed both of these falls which indicated a leaky ship and in a generally buoyant stock market I might add.  

Furthermore it has come to my attention that other stocks such as SXE, SKS and SHA have not suffered the same degree of retracement as IPG (although I am not sure how closely these stocks can be directly compared to IPG).

My point is if management had not released the negative earnings updates after both selloffs I would not have been the wiser and likely would have held on. 

14

Karmast
Added 6 months ago

@mikebrisy We are in agreement on the general business and what short term market factors can do to a business.

I think where we disagree is how much faith we put in the particular people at play here. A senior manager in Yousseff who dumps $5 million worth of his shares in Sept 2024 at $5.10 a share and then buys them back a couple of months later at $3.78 is not my kind of manager. I also note the Independent Director Andrew Moffatt also sold half his holding a few weeks after Yousseff.

And a quick look at Moffatt shows that the other listed companies he's been involved with have paid out lovely management perks whilst performing poorly for shareholders and consistently capital raising as a result.

To wrap it up, the Chair while having some industry experience has no serious Board or listed company experience and is likely the kind of Chair I'd want, if I was manager prioritising myself over the other owners.

I could be wrong of course and this is all circumstantial evidence but I'm happy to eliminate the risk despite liking the overall business.


12