Forum Topics SOL SOL #merger

Pinned straw:

Added a month ago

TLDR; 1+1 = 2 not 3



The proposed merger with Brickworks could result in a new ASX50 name.

Esther Holloway

Soul Patts and Brickworks have agreed to merge. The new combined entity will also raise about AUD 1.3 billion of new equity to cover transaction costs and reduce debt. Since the announcement, shares in Brickworks and Soul Patts were up 28% and 16%, respectively. 

Fundamentals don’t justify rally

The market likes the deal, and we agree that it has merits. It fixes a long-standing governance issue by eliminating the cross-shareholding, boosts free float, and may result in ASX 50 inclusion. Given the positive market reaction, we expect the merger to go through. 

We don’t see material synergies and neither does management. Cost-cutting in Brickworks isn’t on the table, and savings from lower listing fees are negligible. The merger doesn’t create value, so fundamentals don’t justify the share price rally. 

Instead, the merger reallocates value between the existing shareholders of Soul Patts, Brickworks, and the new investors in the institutional equity raise. One plus one still equals two, and for every winner, another party must pay up. 

Merger undervalues Brickworks

The merger undervalues no-moat Brickworks, and we cut our Fair Value estimate 9% to AUD 29 per share. It would lift Soul Patts’ fair value estimate by about 3%, but this is offset by transaction costs. Our AUD 35 fair value estimate stands. 

Both companies are overvalued after the rally. Perhaps Soul Patts shareholders expect more demand from passive money, and indeed, many large caps we cover trade at a premium. 

The combination of the two companies is likely to see extra near-term demand for the shares. But to unwind the cross shareholding, Brickworks shareholders will need to pay. We will make a call on the relative merits of this when we see a scheme booklet

Strawman
Added a month ago

Gosh, the author is a bit harsh in calling Brickworks "no moat" imo @Chagsy

Over the last decade, according to Commsec, Brickworks has averaged a 28% net margin (very much juiced by non-cash gains from property revaluations and its Soul Patts stake) but still well above what you'd expect from a no-moat business. To be fair, the Building Products segment is commoditised and cyclical, and much lower margin. Still, I'd argue that its scale, vertically integrated operations, and strategic location of clay pits offer some not-insignificant competitive advantages.

But i'm just nit picking.

I do agree that the share price jumps are a bit overdone. Soul Patts reckons the merger will unlock $1.2 billion in value, largely from simplifying the cross-shareholding structure, improving liquidity, and boosting index appeal. But on the day of the announcement, Brickworks alone jumped by that amount in market cap, with Soul Patts adding another $1.8 billion. So, the combined gain of ~$3 billion far exceeds what they suggested the restructure might unlock.

That tells you one of two things: either management lowballed the upside, or the market is getting well ahead of itself.

35

Bushmanpat
Added a month ago

Must be the first because the market is always efficient so can't get ahead of itself ;)


14

thunderhead
Added a month ago

Morningstar has always rated Brickworks as a "no moat" name, which is fairly laughable given the difficult-to-replicate assets they have.

12