Pinned straw:
@jcmleng - IRL I hold both NWL and HUB. NWL for 4 yrs, HUB for 3.5 yrs. This from a time I was buying on other people’s recommendations. Obviously both those recces were sound. But like you, I’ve been puzzled by the difference in SP growth between what, on the face of it, are similar companies. And that difference has been pretty much evident throughout the time I’ve held them.
Currently for me (with no additions or subtractions to the holdings since initially bought), NWL sits at a 129% gain, while HUB is at a 298% gain. A substantial difference.
From the most recent Annual Reports, the financial metrics I look at say:
Revenue Growth YoY: NWL 27% HUB 24%
EPS Growth YoY: NWL 39%, HUB 70%
Net cash from operations Growth YoY: NWL 41%; HUB 69%
Net Profit attributed to SHs Growth YoY: NWL 40%; HUB 83%
So from similar revenue growth, HUB’s system throws out more EPS growth, etc. There’s definitely a difference between the companies.
That’s not to say either is a better long-tern investment than the other. More that there’s something “under the hoods” of the businesses that creates a significant difference in the end result which, I assume, underpins the difference in SP growth.