Forum Topics NWL NWL 1QFY26 Update

Pinned straw:

Added 2 months ago

Discl: Held IRL

Nice 1QFY2026 update from NWL today. 

  • Positive momentum across all products & services sums up the quarter. 
  • First Guardian update is cautious - FY26 guidance now includes a caveat against unexpected First Guardian costs


12b26bbd075c2e7618f89c9dc418556b6bc568.png

dfa17f090f79639c776553bb2a078a38cee3ba.png

1d26450f6c7bc51df1c5ba7a2b013d6bb9302a.png

The commentary in the update is littered with the usual “record-this-and-that” which I find quite confusing as it is mostly against the prior corresponding period 1QFY2025. As NWL expects to grow each quarter, referencing and gloating about the pcp comparison seems quite pointless other than to generate the buoyant headlines. While there is some seasonality, I prefer to focus on the underlying QoQ trend instead.

  • Total Funds Under Administration hit $120.8b, increasing $8.0b QoQ, an above trend increase, building on momentum in the previous quarter - up 7.1% QoQ
  • The Quarterly Increase in new accounts of 5,146, up 3.2% QoQ, reverted to trend following the sharp spike in the June 2025 Quarter - the accounts growth is now in short-term acceleration mode - very nice
  • Total Funds Under Management was $29.5b, up 0.2% QoQ, driven by growth in (1) Managed Accounts, up 32.6% on pcp to $25.7b (2) Managed Funds, up 23.0% on pcp to $3.8b


005692389be2709cfd46841b7de0eb21e9a8b4.png

6eb30b10134573091c5bb274bc5822f57cc948.png

FUNDS UNDER ADMINISTRATION

  • Continued on-trend increase in Total FUA Net Flows of $4.0b, slight exceeding 1QFY25 and improving on 4QFY25
  • Continuing to benefit from ongoing transitions from existing financial intermediaries as well as new accounts from new intermediaries
  • Non-Custodial FUA hit $1.0b for the very first time - a pricing increase kicked in on 1 Oct 2025


5e9e2c21fee6f524ec29e9a5cc142adb52f452.png

FUNDS UNDER MANAGEMENT

Sharp uptick in FUM Net Flows of $1.8b, up 63.3% QoQ - a (noticeable!) record as it towers over previous quarters FUM Net Flows.

538dc88bccf8fc3913d85b4fe49fd2e30c5dd4.png

Clio
Added 2 months ago

@jcmleng - IRL I hold both NWL and HUB. NWL for 4 yrs, HUB for 3.5 yrs. This from a time I was buying on other people’s recommendations. Obviously both those recces were sound. But like you, I’ve been puzzled by the difference in SP growth between what, on the face of it, are similar companies. And that difference has been pretty much evident throughout the time I’ve held them.

Currently for me (with no additions or subtractions to the holdings since initially bought), NWL sits at a 129% gain, while HUB is at a 298% gain. A substantial difference.

From the most recent Annual Reports, the financial metrics I look at say:

Revenue Growth YoY: NWL 27% HUB 24%

EPS Growth YoY: NWL 39%, HUB 70%

Net cash from operations Growth YoY: NWL 41%; HUB 69%

Net Profit attributed to SHs Growth YoY: NWL 40%; HUB 83%

So from similar revenue growth, HUB’s system throws out more EPS growth, etc. There’s definitely a difference between the companies.

That’s not to say either is a better long-tern investment than the other. More that there’s something “under the hoods” of the businesses that creates a significant difference in the end result which, I assume, underpins the difference in SP growth.

15

Solvetheriddle
Added 2 months ago

@Clio firstly, i am a HUB s/h and first bought the shares at $1.20 (not for me but the fund i worked for, investors first!!! :(--). NWL was listed some time after that. although both are "new age" platforms and both are/will be winners, i see them a bit differently. As NWL, i see it as more conservative, family-owned/run, highly profitable and having a more lucrative business base. for HUB, i see a more aggressive business builder, coming off a lower profit base but taking more risk on board. so in good times, i would expect HUB to o/p NWL, but both do well. HUB has big ambitions, where i think NWL is sticking much more to its knitting. so HUB's aggressiveness has paid off so far, and they have some ways to go. given my conservativeness, i contemplated a switch from HUB to NWL for my own shares, but i think the tax consequences make me physically ill, lol. In fact, they have done better in execution than i imagined.

another funny fact is that even from the start, my revenue estimates have been pretty close for HUB. It is the cost line, lumpy reinvestment that caused trouble, now we are clearly seeing op lev.

That's my 2c

22