Forum Topics CTD CTD ASX Announcements

Pinned straw:

Added 5 months ago

This is an absolute gem of a post on CTD today.


9af8bc62940cbbf87cace7d3c1b2de7e854758.png

ArrowTrades
Added 5 months ago

If CTD do survive this, I will be tempted to buy the near the open the day it commences trading.

These long suspensions give people a long time to stew, seethe, worry and get angry. Pretty good conditions for spite selling at any price.

Have seen it a couple times before, FNP comes to mind as a good quick trade after a scandal.

22

Solvetheriddle
Added 5 months ago

@ArrowTrades , you are probably right; if/when CTD comes on, there will likely be elevated volatility. Until you can get an accurate read, the bulls will defend it to some extent, and the bears will dump at any price. Good luck to you. Every time i try this caper, it ends up a cluster, so if you have the skills to execute, well done

i have to have a good think about this one, it is right in my wheelhouse as a likely investment, but even though i did a bit of work on it, never pulled the trigger, while several of the guys i rate and follow did. have to see if there are any useful takeaways from this.

20
Solvetheriddle
Added 5 months ago

Monty python black knight lives on ! Good luck to him

24

thunderhead
Added 5 months ago

The "tree shake" is about to strip it off all its leaves, flowers, and fruit.

Surely that's just satire?

18

Bear77
Added 5 months ago

It reads like satire for sure @thunderhead with all the usual "the share price getting smashed is even better than the share price doing a moonshot" rhetoric, with zero concern for the underlying issues faced by the company and the very negative implications for shareholders... however on some of those sites... let's just say there are people who actually appear to believe that rubbish. It's analogous to religious zeal, and anyone who disagrees is bound for hell.

17

ArrowTrades
Added 5 months ago

I mean it is Hot Copper, So I am sure of nothing! Haha

15

thunderhead
Added 5 months ago

I would have a better inkling if I saw more of that person's posts, but it's the first time I have come across him.

Yeah, HC is a sea of filth, but there are also some excellent posters there (many of whom may be withdrawing sadly because of the cesspool it is).

13

stevegreenycom
Added 5 months ago

It is a good example of a post why they have that "great analysis" button to click on!

8

Schwerms
Added 5 months ago

I know right, that's a hall of fame post

8

Bear77
Added 3 weeks ago

For those who were surprised by the magnitude of both Cochlear's guidance downgrade today (Wednesday 20th April 2026) and the dive in the COH SP down $68.36 or -40.71% to close at $99.58/share, spare a thought for the unfortunate bagholders who have been stuck holding CTD shares. Their Corporate-Travel-Management---Update-on-Financial-Statements.pdf announcement today was not unexpected but the extent of the UK revenue that they have to back out from prior financial years is staggering and continues to grow. It might not get any worse, but even at today's disclosed levels, it's very, very bad. Much worse than we knew of when they were suspended from trading back in August last year. The fact that they remain suspended meant their share price couldn't and didn't fall TODAY, but if and when they resume trading (one day), it will NOT be at anwhere near their last traded price - of $16.05/share.

I don't hold them, but there is a morbid fascination about a company who survives a major short seller attack and then years later it turns out that the bulk of the accusations made by that short seller years ago have proven to be accurate.

Here's some of my notes on that 7 page announcement today:

2bb69b4b1eacbc771716782a82fdafc1a9d31a.jpeg

I have highlighted in red there the headline numbers and reasons. That's not even A$s, that's 118 million British Pounds.

Keep that figure in mind, because CTM have a lot less cash than that, as they disclose later in this announcement, and they are therefore trying to negotiate a settlement with their main "customer" - being the UK Government (specifically the UK Home Office), along with associated bodies like the Greater London Authority - and CTM (ASX: CTD) want to pay this "customer" back over a period of years, as you will see, because that's the only way they can pay them back without becoming insolvent, unless of course they were able to raise fresh capital to cover the hundreds of millions of dollars worth of refunds and repayments. As shown directly below.

6c2524f0bd456a9d4599c01b1a4a2b1fb34bd5.jpeg

Note that CTM were aware of the issue as early as 2022, or at least a fair chunk of it, being almost half of it, i.e. 54.6 million English pounds worth of it (red rectangle above) and they're throwing their former UK CEO under the London bus (orange rectangle above and below), which is convenient, since they have fired him so he can get blamed for everything apparently, except of course for the amazing lack of oversight by the group and the Board.

4f8f5c053538214abc4c7d0cb2e85aa54a7433.jpeg

So now they are suggesting that the former UK CEO may have committed what looks like fraud, as highlighted in the two red rectangles above.

51937350dba0227af29238530ed19173f621f4.jpeg

The two paragraphs highlighted in red above are the most damning, IMO, because they detail the extent of the issues as well as that the problem was not confined to the UK Government (the "customer" referred to numerous times today in the announcement) - and that there are investigations being undertaken by "authorities" that CTM intends to co-operate with. That's more than one authority, plural, and I imagine in more than one country as well, with the UK and Australia (ASIC and the ASX) being two countries in which there will already be official investigations being undertaken at this point.

That "Termination" line above, highlighted in orange, and a number of other paragraphs highlighted in orange below are examples of attempts at positive spin by the Board and current management of CTM. They have to do it, but it's laughable to expect people to accept that this was all the work of one rogue manager in the UK and that the Australian head office (for the group) and the company's Board couldn't possibly have known about it. They readily admit in this same document that they all knew about a fair bit of this UK overcharging back in 2022, yet it seemed they promoted that person from UK COO to UK CEO (Chief Operating Officer to Chief Executive Officer), as disclosed on page 2 above (highlighted in orange by me) .

295ce7ff94a69bcca82ba931ff29088f297c39.jpeg

The text highlighted in red above is a warning of a significant writedown of intangibles (goodwill) to come - in addition to the real-money losses already discussed.

Note their current cash and available funding position immediately below - and compare that with their disclosed liabilities so far.

d6730b761e15880bc71b1bf533cde41cac56ba.jpeg

81489a074cd6ba22cd76acf84adc5f934a2b66.jpeg

I've highlighted further attempts at positive spin in orange on the pages above.

Source: Corporate-Travel-Management---Update-on-Financial-Statements.pdf [22-Apr-2026]

Little wonder that Jamie Pherous was encouraged to "retire" in early Feb:

7dfbef7bf64933ada459cd056a62353ca0e57e.jpeg

Source: Retirement-of-Founder-and-Appointment-of-Acting-Group-CEO.pdf [02-Feb-2026]

We knew it was going to get worse, but this is probably a bigger iceberg than what most people expected back in August.

And it's not over yet.

27

GazD
Added 3 weeks ago

Thanks@Bear77 some very well respected investors in this one. Dodged a bullet but not because I was clever and am watching with fascination.

12

Solvetheriddle
Added 3 weeks ago

yes its funny how we can come across left field stuff that becomes useful later. I was involved in a business that was very fragile, it would later crack badly. i knew this full well, and really had no discretion, and so should have others have known it was gragile, but JP was one of the discretionary investors. in hindsight we are all wise, but how perople invest on the risk/reward spectrum can be an intersting and an indication of overall risk taking, imo. so i was really tempted to invest in CTD, it is right in my sweet spot, but knowing what i did i just wasnt comfortbale. so good luck, good call, maybe a mix, as they often are, who knows.

21

Scott
Added 3 weeks ago

I do hold this so of course I have picked out information from the company that puts a less-negative spin on it. I listened to the call the other day.

  • Yes they did know of issues in 2022 and attempted to address them.
  • They had agreements drafted to address the issues and present to affected customers.
  • "Former UK CEO was responsible for discussing the letter agreements with the customer, obtaining agreement to the content of the letters and having them signed. The Former UK CEO provided CTM with copies of the signed letter agreements"
  • "In late November 2025 (in the forensic review discussed below), CTM became aware of a suggestion that the letter agreements may not, in fact, be authentic. This contradicted the position understood and relied on by the Board."
  • This isn't throwing the former CEO under the bus, but it does highlight a lack of governance (checks and balances)
  • The UK business is still a profitable, cash generative business.
  • There has been no noticeable churn in customers in the UK
  • GBP$118M is an extremely large amount - but doesn't represent the cash they need to pay. They have already paid 12M and may be entitled to refunds on tax paid of 24M. Separately there will be a goodwill write down. Best case (with full tax back) the amount is reduced to about AUD$140M. They hold $115M in cash and have $75M in undrawn debt.

So yes it is going to be painful - but it doesn't sound terminal.

13

Bear77
Added 3 weeks ago

All fair points @Scott however do you have any rational explanation for:

  • Why CTD management promoted the "former UK CEO" from UK COO to UK CEO after they were already aware of the issues in 2022?
  • If they can afford to repay all of the amounts still owing from their cash and unused financing facility, then why are they attempting to negotiate settlements ("commercial agreements", as explained at the top of page 2) with "impacted customers" - "which, if agreed, will provide for refunds over an extended period aligned with CTM's current liquidity position and future anticipated earnings", i.e. they intend to take years to pay these amounts back in full?

And if those negotiations are unsuccessful and the UK Government (who are owed the vast majority of the money) want it all paid back now, do you really think that would not be terminal? 118 million British pounds (£118,000,000) is approximately 222.5 million Australian dollars (A$222,550,000). If you deduct A$12M already repaid and another A$24M in possible tax refunds, that $222.55M reduces to A$186.55 million, not A$140M. If they fully draw their debt, they would have $190m, which just covers that $186.55 million if they get all of the tax refunds they are anticipating, but leaves them with just $3.45 million of working capital. And they would have debt, including any existing debt plus the $75m fully drawn facility that they would need to fully draw to cover the repayments, and that means lending/banking covenants come into play, some of which would almost certainly be breached, particularly if and when they are able to resume trading and market capitalisation could become an issue if it's included as part of one of those banking covenants.

Also, when I say they are throwing him (the former UK CEO) under the bus, I mean that they are saying it's all his fault. That's a fair analogy I reckon.

Good luck with this one but there's a reason why the founder and former MD of this business left the business in the middle of all this. He clearly doesn't see this ending well.

14

Bear77
Added 3 weeks ago

And that's not even getting into their legal fees. They are racking up a huge bill with their auditors and KPMG UK - who they say is continuing to assist them, and they won't be doing that for free, and they also have to defend any criminal or corporate charges that get levied against them, and then there's the class actions from shareholders that are to come. Sure, CTM (ASX: CTD) might have legal liability insurance and/or other insurance, but their insurers would likely argue that the Board and management have been negligent and haven't done their own jobs properly and therefore this situation is NOT outside of their own control because they didn't provide enough oversight and governance over the past 6 years. Any which way you look at it, they are racking up costs right now that are going to eat into their available cash and funding.


12