Yes, certainly did - the key takeways were in my notes - about initiatives around wish lists and the like......

Thanks for that once again. Much appreciated.

Perhaps just add a warning such as "Endorsing this valuation will have the effect of making this your own valuation and will delete any other valuation you may have previously saved for this company. Do you still wish to endorse this valuation?" Some of the issues that some of us have with this site isn't so much the theory behind what occurs so much as that some of it occurs as a surprise to us. Other times it's how things happen. Sometimes it's why? For example, when straws got deleted immediately when they were larger than 2,500 characters - without any warning - or explanation - that was a pain!! That has been completely fixed now - 5,000 character limits for straws with a character count and a warning to reduce content before saving when it's over the limit. Perfect. A second - or alternative - suggestion for handling the valuation endorsement issue - is that you could have a "like" or "vote up" option to give users the option to indicate that they like the reasoning behind somebody else's valuation, without necessarily having their own valuation deleted. Exactly as you have for straws. I would still prefer that warning step on the "endorse valuation" option be added however, so that it's clear what will happen if they go down that path.

Excellent points -- thanks Bear77. The warning is a no-brainer, and we'll have a ponder about the like.