Forum Topics LOV LOV Acquisition History

Pinned straw:

Last edited one year ago

Lovisa Acquisition History

·      December 2020 beeline execution of a put option agreement in relation to the acquisition of the beeline France sotre network of 30 stores. Lovisa will acquire beeline France for a purchase price of €10 (ten Euros) https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20201201/pdf/44qh128v116s7z.pdf

·      November 2020 beeline purchase for €60 as part of the transaction, upon completion, of the take over approximately €3 million of bank guarantees associated with the leases of the acquired beeline entities, as well as provide a further €3 million bank guarantee to the vendor to support our obligations under the share purchase Agreement, expiring on 31 March 2022. beeline store network consists of 114 stores, including 30 stores in France subject to the Put Option discussed above. https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20201113/pdf/44ptns0td4ydfy.pdf

·      May 2017 Acquisition of 17 fashion accessory stores from Klines South Africa the majority of which will be rebranded as Lovisa’s stores following the handover. The acquisition includes the sotre locations (lease assignments) and fixtures and fittings at a total cost of A$800K https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20170501/pdf/43hxkw534sfcr8.pdf

·      March 2015 LOV acquires 21 Retail Stores in South Africa, the majority of which will be re-branded immediately following handover. Purchase price of A$2.0m with a further deferred payment of A4250K payable 12 months post transaction. https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20150326/pdf/42xj6xwvl113r1.pdf

No Capital Raises since IPO!!!

Strawman
Added one year ago

Love that @Magneto

That deserves repeating -- "no capital raises since IPO."

Remarkable given the expansion and growth.

The more I think about it, the more I am convinced that sound capital management is the biggest indicator of management quality.

And poor capital management is the surest way to hobble an otherwise attractive business.. for my sins, I continue to hold some stocks that have a beautiful core of high ROI products, but (past) management have dulled the performance through unwise investment.

It's one of the reasons I was so encouraged with Mike Veverka's (Jumbo) recognition of his business's advantages, and the resolute focus on only the things that leverage that. Little wonder it's delivered the results it has.

25

Solvetheriddle
Added one year ago

@Strawman the longer your holding period the more important capital management becomes until it becomes the dominant feature, imo. i penned a piece called "set and forget investing", that concluded if you did invest like that, although not recommended, to choose the best asset allocators, SOL, WES, MIN, IFT, BRK.US etc. we can of course discuss who those actually are lol.

18

Strawman
Added one year ago

Agreed!

I'd love to read that piece @Solvetheriddle -- do you have a link?

12

Solvetheriddle
Added one year ago

no, just sits in my ramblings file, maybe ill tart it up and put it on SM as an interest piece

13

UlladullaDave
Added one year ago

I reckon when you have incremental ROIC over 100% you can make a lot of allocation mistakes without anyone ever noticing. It's one of the strengths of LOV that they cut their losses early on new markets if they are not getting results. I don't think a management team would cut and run like that if they were having to invest tens of millions to enter a new market.


22

Strawman
Added one year ago

I'd be also happy to post it on the blog if you want @Solvetheriddle (but no pressure, up to you)

And I think you make a great point too @UlladullaDave -- and the ability to walk away from something is a huge strength (for management teams and investors alike!).

I'm usually not too critical of a company that makes an unsuccessful foray into a new market/geography/product if it's well reasoned. The far greater sin is plugging ahead when it's clearly not working.


23

UlladullaDave
Added one year ago

Yeah, it's a big strength, but I think it's a strength of the business rather than management being particularly more disciplined than average. Granular incrementalism with low up front costs, out of this world returns, short payback periods and a very long way to go to world domination of costume jewellery. There's no reason right now for them to wander off the path. If a shop or country doesn't work you just pack up and take the circus to the next town so to speak.

I really like hearing what guys like Mike from JIN have to say. The mindset of the owner operator is different. He talks about being a software engineer and letting all the big guys chase casinos and sports betting while he sticks to his knitting. That sort of focus really resonates with me. (BTW, great interview again @Strawman )

18

Strawman
Added one year ago

Yeah that's very true. As uncle Warren said:

"When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact."

Still, you want a management team that understands what it is about their business that is special (and what isn't) and invests accordingly.

22