Forum Topics NEU NEU News

Pinned straw:

Added 6 months ago

Adding to @wtsimis straw on results reported by Acadia Pharmaceuticals in New York early this morning, I am just off the call, and the results have significant implicatoins for Neuren ($NEU).

Note: $ACAD markets Trofinetide (“Daybue”) under licence from $NEU.

Revenue

DAYBUE sales in the quarter were $66.9m, far exceeding guidance set just last quarter of $45-55m.

The revenue was attributed to a surge in demand from the Rett community, a significant portion of which are treated through Centres of Excellence, which created strong demand for the product once launched. Retts Syndrome has a strong patient community both at local levels and globally, So awareness of the treatment in the community is very high, and there is no other treatment.

Uptake, Persistency and Dosing

There are now 800 patients on DAYBUE.

On persistency, i.e., how long people stay on the drug, the great news is that persistency is significantly higher than seen in clinical trials. The key persistency measures at 4 months are:

·      81% as measured by confirmed discontinuations

·      75% measure by confirmations + patients at 60+ days past their scheduled refill

·      compares favourably with 65% recorded in the Lilac-1 clinical trial

This indicates that patients are staying on the treatment at a higher rate than was projected in the clinical studies.

On dosing, as reported earlier, patients typically start on 50% of the label dose (calculated according to their weight) and then titrate up until they achieve maximum benefits at tolerable side effects. To date, compliance to dose at month three is 75-80%, indicating the progress patients are making towards building toward the label dose.

Reimbursement

In terms of access, Payers are adopting formal plans covering almost 80% of lives to date. (We've spoken separately about the VA 5-year contract, for example.)

Market Rollout

Canada will be the next market to launch. $ACAD are already in conversations with the regulator, and expecting to launch in the next 18 months.

$ACAD are starting conversations with regulators in Europe and take scientific advice. (A two year timeframe has been indicated previously).

Also starting conversations with Japan and prepared to be opportunistic elsewhere.

Guidance

Guidance for Q4 is $80-$87.5m.


MY ANALYSIS

These are outstanding results significantly exceeding expectations. Not only is sales strong, but the measures of persistency and dose-to-label compliance are very positive, indicating that patients will take more of the drug for treatment and are likely to stay on treatment for longer.

While its early days, the market uptake is ahead of my model. The 800 patients on DAYBUE at end of Q3 is the number I had modelled as the average for Q4.

Given Q2 sales of $22m, and $66.9 in Q3, the 4th Q sales range of $80m - $87.5m appears to be conservative, give the progress to date.

However, the early surge in demand has even surprised $ACAD, and no doubt they are proceeding cautiously in the event that the initial surge begins to fade. Clearly, many patients and their families were eagerly awaiting launch driving the initial surge of prescriptions in Q2 which flowed into sales in Q3, given the time lag to register and gain approval for reimbursement.

CEO Steve Davis said “We brought the launch to a stepped up basis, but what we expect to see leaving the 3rd quarter is more linear growth”. He noted that this is the pattern $ACAD have seen with other rare disease product launches.

These results are very encouraging, and should read across very well to $NEU.


My Key Takeaway

I think this could be the start of a series of upgrades for $NEU. Here is the picture to date ... that analysts are waking up, but the market has been slow to respond.

I have an order in the market to increase my RL position by 25%.


My Valuation

My current Valuation is $20, based on a wide range of scenarios from $12 to $58.

I'll do my next model rebuild once Q4 is in, when we'll have had the readout on NNZ-2591 to which I currently ascribe zero value. However, I may take a look at the lowest value scenarios to see if they remain credible in light of the progress of DAYBUE to date.

Below, is a graph of analysts consensus. SP has aimlessly drifted lower on bond yields. Wakey Wakey!



1fabeb976442067918356086d0fed0dbf28a87.png


mikebrisy
6 months ago

Now I can see the EPS forecast Revisions - very interesting. (There's usually a day's lag on marketscreen.com between seeing the target price change and the EPS revision. Its now available for $NEU and it is interesting.)

First of all on target price: I see that the increase in TP reported in my post yesterday is due to one broker revision only. Going from what appears to be $22.21 to $31.64! This gives us a flavour of the potential strength of valuation upgrades we might see on this stock as 1) more analysts start to update their research and 2) we get more quarters of sales growth data from DAYBUE. As other brokers upgrade, I expect to see more upward revisions. We're also likely to get more brokers covering this.

What I find fascinating from the chart below, is that the FY24 EPS upgrade from $0.43 to $0.57 or $18m makes sense for 1 of 4 analysts moving a milestone payment from FY25 into FY24 with some additional % royalty from higher sales. (Milestone element = US$50/0.64 x 70% (tax) = $A55m or +$0.43 incremental eps; +$0.43m/4 = +$0.11m, with the balance due to %royalty on increased sales).

Consequenty, FY25 EPS has fallen from $0.89 to $0.80 to reflect the removed milestone of one analyst offset by some increase in the % sales royalty...but not much.

But that puts FY25 on a p/e of 15! For a product that will still be growing reasonably well in the US, and not even getting started in ROW! (Gimme a break)

While I haven't update my model yet, I think there could be further time-horizon arbitrage in this. I am even more confident that the upgrade cycle has further to run, and that all it needs is a strong Q4 salres number.

Disc: Held in RL and SM

962d9b87c1c20029c1052552985b74f8ec4c1c.png

16

BoredSaint
6 months ago

@mikebrisy

Thanks for posting this. NEU is definitely an interesting company given its royalty structure. For disclosure I do hold some shares. I'm gonna do some rambling below and just want some thoughts (happy for anyone to contribute). I guess this is somewhat of a Devil's advocate/bear thesis to counter all the wonderful analysis that has already been posted here.

Based on the analysts forecasts that you've posted, an FY25 EPS of 0.80 would imply approximately $100m in NPAT. I think based on figures from the past FY, total expenses came in around $15m and assuming a 30% tax rate would mean that total revenue of around $150m AUD.

I've plugged in the numbers on a basic spreadsheet and excluding any milestone payments, in order to achieve $150m of royalties from just NA, would need around $800m USD of annual sales of Daybue. Based on an average cost per patient of around $375k, this would equate to around 2100 patient's treated per annum (current enrolment is around 800). Acadia themselves have estimated that there are around 4500 patient's in NA diagnosed with Rett's Syndrome and in total around 10k-15k total cases in NA alone. Given the success of Daybue at the early stages, I think achieving a 20-25% market penetration is not totally unbelievable.

I guess going forward given that the sales milestones are a once off event, and these payments are likely going to be funding future projects (and not into shareholders pockets for example), then lets say Daybue starts to plateau at around 2000-2500 patient's treated per annum, then the royalty and NPAT figure are going to remain fairly constant. So the question would begin to be related to how much would you pay for a royalties business with minimal growth. A similar (but obviously completely different industry) royalties business in Deterra trades on around 15x-17x PE. The market average for the ASX200 is around 15x PE. It seems almost poetic that the figure for FY25 would be 15x PE.

Of course the catalyst for further upside would be through the ROW distribution and NNZ-2591 results and commercialisation. And for this reason I do hold shares and will continue to unless the thesis breaks (no ROW commercialisation or NNZ-2591 results are poor).

Let me know your thoughts.

Disc: Held IRL and on Strawman.


17

mikebrisy
6 months ago

Good questions.

First up, there is potentially a very large difference between the number of people with Retts and the currently diagnosed patients. Various peer reviewed studies estimate the incidence, and I have conservatively assumed it as 0.7 per 10,000.

This means the potential market today in the US is 10,000 of which only 5,000 are currently identified. One potential reason for underdiagnosis is that the symptoms of Retts overlap with other neurological conditions. Hitherto, with no treatment available, it is considered likely that there has been a tendancy not to diagnose. Now that the treatment and uptake of it is well know in those involved in diagnosing neurological conditions, it is reasonable that the base of diagnosed patients will grow. This is a multplier on top of the steady growth of the US market.

While the milestones are indeed one-off, there are a lot of them, stepping right up to >$1bn US sales, which I estimate will be reached in 2026 or 2027 at latest, and in the ROW milestones may start as early as FY25 and continue (by my modelling) right through to 2031 (I have ROW sales at $ACAD hitting $1bn in 2031).

So I am getting bigger numbers because I am looking at the global-able-to-pay market, and seeing sustainable growth just for DAYBUE out as far as 2032.

19
mikebrisy
6 months ago

$NEU have now issued their own release.

ASX Annoucement.

(Pleased my order was executed at $12.40, RL position is 3.5%)

17

Scoonie
6 months ago

Excellent rundown mikebrisy. The NEU story is near unbelievable.

At today's market update Arcadia's projected monthly sales of Daybue,are midpoint $US83.5m. This results in annualised sales figure of around $US1b. At this sales rate royalties of around $A230m are headed to NEU. In addition there are one off milestone payments of around the same amount. Then there is mid-term Daybue RoW sales and the other 5 rare conditions with drug development currently in Phase 2.

Who will spoil the party? Well others are trying to take it off NEU. NASDAQ listed Anavex has a successful Ph3 Rhetts condition result for a drug called Anavex @2-73.

Question is, assuming a further FDA approval is granted, how long will this all take and if successful, what will the drug do to Daybue's market share? To the second question I have no idea. To the first, let's just say Anavex would be unlikely to have anything in a bottle in under 18 months.

So even at a share price of $13, giving NEU a market cap of around $1.7b NEU is, very roughly selling on a PE of less than 10.

Where do you get value like that in Australian listed life sciences?



18

NewbieHK
6 months ago

Great reviews thanks Strawpeople. We should know next month (as previously reported by the company) if Daybue is just the first of a number of drugs that will bring in income. The beauty is the next drugs currently under testing are owned outright by NEU! Daybue May just be the introduction for this life changing company.

Hold IRL

18

mikebrisy
6 months ago

@Scoonie not sure if this is what you meant, but the midpoint of the Q4 revenues for DAYBUE for $ACAD is US$83.75m for the quarter, not monthly!

Previously, $ACAD have undertaken to guide one quarter ahead until they get enough confidence to provide annual guidance.

The revenue growth potential is significant.

In my base model $ACAD DAYBUE FY23 sales were forecast to be US$147m (vs US$174m now forecast based on Q2 and Q3 actuals and Q4 midpoint), growing in FY24 $396m - which only requires c. 1200 patients under treatment by Q4 FY24. That looks like its going to easily be exceeded, with lower churn and higher compliance to label than I assumed further driving revenue per script.

My problem is that my model is a bit of a mess and needs a rebuild, which I will do ready for the Q4 $ACAD result.

One thing I am not sure about is how revenue recognition will work regarding the Royaly Milestones for CY Annual Sales. (Any StrawPeople with expertise on revenue recognition?) This doesn't affect valuation which is driven off cashflow, but it may drive market sentiment and price targets based on EPS multiples.

Based on my analysis $NEU is easily going to land the US$250m sales milestone of US$50m for CY24 sales. While this wont be paid until early in CY25, I will be interested to see how revenue recognition works. For example, at a Q4FY23 runrate of US$85m without any further growth (0% chance), sales in FY24 will be US$340m. There is now an upside chance that if strong growth continues, we could even be pushing triggering the milestone payment for US$500m sales in CY25. But let's not get excited and wait to see what happens to sales momentum in Q4.

The SP reaction this morning is modest, and I wonder if that is because $NEU investors have not bothered to model this bottom-up off number of patients and applying the royalty structure. Personally, I don't mind. Things are progressing well, and this is allowing me to steadily build a significant position while the SP is still way below my valuation.

Fingers crossed now for the December NNZ-2591 readout.

I agree with your bottom line - I think this one is unique at the moment in Aussie listed life sciences. But again, if NNZ-2591 comes in, we ain't seen nothing yet.

Again, I owe this one entirely to being part of Strawman community, and to @Nnyck777 specifically.


23

acarbone1
6 months ago

Great Annalysis/Summaries to everyone above. I may be a little over bullish but if the stars align I think that the 500mil milestone payment could be a chance for the final qtr FY2024. My predicted sales range is between 400mil and 600mil.

I don’t know too much about the timing of revenue recognition but if it’s anything to go by; first sales were reported in April 2023 and the associated 40mil milestone payment was received in June 2023.

Aside from the growth assumptions the only other risk I currently see is the reliance on a single distributor/licensee. That said In the Strawman Meeting the CEO made comment that the companies are working well together (Me Paraphrasing).

13