Pinned straw:
I feel your pain! It is really hard to maintain conviction in the face of this. I am holding on to a few things...
A cloud-native, modern, modular EPR capability still makes a lot of sense given reduced IT budgets, reduced hospital staff and sunk/historical IT costs. Incremental add-ons mean faster speed to deployment and faster benefit to clinical staff on the ground. Notwithstanding ALC is not the only provider offering this capability, it is an important positioning the company has taken for some time now.
Revenue may not go up as much as we hoped or as fast as we hoped, but on the other hand it shouldn't drop dramatically or drop at all given previous contracts signed and recurring revenue locked in. This is the upside of these businesses with long lead time on sales, ie. once the sales are locked in they usually have long-term customers with low churn and predictable recurring revenue. Costs can always come down to improve the cash flow/cash position when the company decides it is needed.
Also Department of Defence contract - this is a multi-year, once in a generation contract, again likely to go on for many, many years and over time may result in additional modules/functionality being taken up by Defence, especially given ALC's positioning here as the longitudinal health record platform.
All of this still gives me some hope. And even with a longer time to get new sales and a sustained period of share price pressure, there is always the potential for a takeover from a strategic buyer. The company has working products/solutions being used by many customers so it will have some commercial and strategic value.
Interested in others' thoughts on this too!