Thanks for your comments @hainc @TomS @wtsimis@CanadianAussie. Really, this wasn’t much trouble, some info off the Gateway website with a few comments of my own about the opportunity and fit.
Since then I’ve been thinking more about deal itself. It’s very clever. With Laserbond taking a 40% ownership upfront, Gateway is still the majority owner controlling the WA business. Laserbond has the OPTION to increase their holding to 51% at 4.5 x maximum of 3 year average EBITDA any time in the next 3 years. Options are always clever if you’re the one holding the option, especially when the option costs you nothing.
Until Laserbond takes up this option, Gateway will be doing their darnedest to make sure EBITDA is maximised so they get a decent price for the next 11% tranche of their business. At the same time Gateway own shares in Laserbond, and could eventually own more if script is used as part of the next 11%. So they will also be doing their best to ensure synergies with Laserbond are maximised in the partnership.
The option also gives Laserbond time to see how the Gateway partnership and the mining economy performs over the next three years. Laserbond have the option, but not the obligation to increase their ownership in Gateway. It would seem that both companies have discussed the possibility of a complete takeover of Gateway, but there is no obligation from either at this point in time.
In summary, the deal is very synergistic for both partners, and provides Laserbond with the option to get in deeper if the business and partnership thrives, at a predetermined price of 4.5 x maximum of 3yr average EBITDA, at any time in the next 3 years. It looks very similar to an American Style Call Option (for those who follow derivatives).