I've done some more research into the HPA sector and have a better understanding of where A4N is positioned.
As you know, HPA has been produced a graveyard of wannabees all with the promise of high IRR and NPVs. ADN, CCM, ATC, CR9 and now QPM (announced that current CEO is stepping down and now pivoting from battery metals to the gas energy market)
A4N seems different in that they rely on someone else (Rio Tinto) to provide feedstock for producing HPA through the patent SX process. Can argue this is an advantage over other HPA players using Aluminous clay as the feedstock.
Could write a straw on this but need a lot of time and will be pretty long. Instead if we get a meeting and I'm not there, we should focus on the following questions
* How costs stack up against inflation, wage pressure etc. The PFS was done in March 2020 at a time of low interest rates
* What are these guys doing that is different from the likes of Sumitomo Chemical (they produce HPA from their Aluminum refining operations), and Advanced Energy Materials (Private company with operations in Canada)
* Capex lifecycle. Number of years till some spending is required to keep the plant running at optimum production.
* What customers look for in HPA before signing the offtake (no offtakes signed yet, but I guess the federal funding does give a better incentive as customer does not need to fund the build)
Plus I'm sure there's a few other questions....