Forum Topics WOW WOW Analyst Views

Pinned straw:

Added 7 months ago

FWIW Morningstar published their updated views on WOW overnight - they have it as a 2 Star stock with a Fair Value of $27.50

Woolworths: Hard to Find the Silver Lining in a Tough Quarter

Analyst Note | by Johannes Faul Updated May 02, 2024

Woolworths' March quarter 2024 update reveals that, like competitor no-moat Coles, its customers are under pressure. Australian supermarket sales grew a modest 1.5% on the previous corresponding period, starkly underperforming 5% growth at Coles. We are reluctant to extrapolate the differential in sales growth of the two largest Australian supermarket chains over a relatively short time period. There are temporary factors for divergence in near-term sales momentum, including the timing of promotions and Coles' collectibles marketing.

Woolworths' shelf prices fell slightly on last year, and volumes undershot population growth. With quarterly sales tracking below our expectations, we lower our fiscal 2024 revenue forecast marginally. This reduces our fiscal 2024 EPS forecast by 3% to AUD 1.41. Our long-term outlook is broadly intact, and although shares have fallen around 20% over the past 12 months, narrow-moat Woolworths still trades 10% above our unchanged AUD 27.50 fair value estimate.

We share management's view that the next 12 months look tough for Woolworths. A combination of heightened competition and low inflation points to very modest revenue growth in fiscal 2025. We expect Australian supermarket sales will grow by 3%, adjusting for 53 trading weeks in fiscal 2024. Meanwhile, Woolworths' wage bill, closely linked to the minimum wage, should continue to rise. In June 2024, the Fair Work Commission is set to deliver its fiscal 2025 minimum wage decision, and there is a risk of wage growth outpacing sales growth. Alongside the cost of ramping the new distribution centers, this contributes to our forecast of a 40-basis-point operating margin decline for Australian supermarkets, to 4.7% in fiscal 2025 from a forecast 5.1% in fiscal 2024.


The remainder of their research report remains from Feb 21 2024 ...


Business Strategy and Outlook | by Johannes Faul Updated Feb 21, 2024

Woolworths is one of Australia's largest retailing groups, operating supermarkets and discount department stores. Its market capitalization is around AUD 45 billion, with annual sales of over AUD 60 billion.

Woolworths has a narrow economic moat characterized by an extensive supermarket store network, serviced by an efficient supply chain operation coupled with significant buying power. It operates in the very competitive supermarket and discount department store segments of the retail sector. Intense competition has taken its toll on margins. Management has reset prices lower to drive foot traffic and increase basket sizes. Volume growth is vital for maximizing supply chain efficiencies.

To contextualize Woolworths' enormous scale advantage, its Australian food sales of over AUD 40 billion represented about 15% of total Australian retail sales in fiscal 2022. The percentage increases substantially if sales are strictly comparable. For example, Woolworths has negligible exposure to cafes, restaurants, and takeaways, where sales totaled some AUD 60 billion. We estimate that a more representative percentage on a strictly comparable basis would fall closer to 20%.

Key risks involve increased competition in the Australian retail landscape and reduced consumer spending. The change in ownership of Australia's largest retailer, Coles, in 2007, was the catalyst for increased price competition by both groups to win market share, while the entry of Amazon Australia could raise the competitive bar in the future. The aggressive expansion of low-cost discounter Aldi has altered and further segmented the grocery sector and increased competitive pressure. A reduction in the rate of growth in consumer spending would affect revenue growth and could affect operating margins. Increased frugality and heightened deflationary pressures would crimp top-line sales growth, and relatively high fixed-cost leverage would affect margin.

However, Woolworths is well positioned to withstand cyclically weak consumer spending. Woolworths is a defensive stock, with food retailing generating most of group revenue and profit, a solid balance sheet, and a narrow moat surrounding its economic profits.

Economic Moat | by Johannes Faul Updated Feb 21, 2024

We believe Woolworths has a narrow economic moat sourced from cost advantages underpinned by its significant scale. As of 2022, we estimate Woolworths to have 36% market share with roughly 25% more sales and stores than the second-largest supermarket in Australia, Coles, which commands 28% market share. In recent years, Woolworths has maintained an average EBIT margin of 5% in Australian food and about 50 basis points ahead of Coles, whilst also managing to expand market share. Woolworths’ growing market share and superior operating margin over Coles and other competitors is attributable to its narrow economic moat and also provides Woolworths with extra protection to defend its market dominance and the ability to outcompete on price cutting.

Woolworths’ dominant scale allows it to leverage distribution, administration, and marketing costs in a way that smaller competitors cannot. From this alone, we estimate Woolworths to have an operating margin advantage over its closest competitor. Aside from Coles, Woolworths also has superior bargaining power due to its higher sales volumes over its competitors, and is able to negotiate lower prices and better terms with its supplier. As a result of their combined 65% market share—which they have held steady despite Aldi’s growth—consumer packaged goods firms require both Woolworths and Coles as distribution channels to penetrate the Australian market comprehensively. A significant shift in their bargaining power is unlikely to occur over the next decade. As a fully integrated supermarket, Woolworths also has an additional cost advantage over independent retailers. This includes those within the IGA network—representing 11% of the Australian food retailing market—which only earn a retailing margin, with the wholesaler margin captured by others, like Metcash.

We view a narrow moat rating to be more appropriate than wide. Aldi continues to expand its network and improve and broaden its product quality and range, but we forecast its sales growth to slow significantly toward the overall market’s growth rate of 4% by 2024. There is also the latent threat of Amazon Australia introducing its Fresh category, but in our view this is unlikely to have a material impact in the foreseeable future, given the long lead time and difficulty to replicate Woolworths’ store network and market share—in-store and online—as well as its mature relationships with Australian suppliers. This is evidenced by Aldi taking nearly two decades before reaching close to 10% market share, still a relatively small player.

Higher private-label penetration presents an opportunity for Woolworths to improve its sales mix to higher-margin products and broaden its offering to price sensitive customers for whom it competes with Aldi. Private-brand penetration in Australia significantly lags key European markets, with Australia at around 20% compared with the U.K., for example, at over 40%.

Amazon Fresh is having mixed results in other jurisdictions and the online behemoth hasn’t yet proven to be as disruptive in groceries as it has in books, electronics, and sporting goods. Amazon currently operates in about 20 countries, with Fresh available in select cities in only five of them (United Kingdom, United States, Japan, Germany, and India). In the U.S., food retail is currently sitting at around 3% e-commerce penetration compared with over 10% across all retailing, and Amazon’s share is only a fraction despite launching Fresh over a decade ago, in 2007. Germany is Amazon’s second-largest retailing market after the U.S. We estimate Amazon has about 25% share of the German food and liquor retailing online market. However, since online penetration of the German supermarket sector is less than 2%, Amazon’s share of the market is still less than 1%. Amazon’s German website was launched in 1998 and Amazon Fresh has been available in select cities since 2017 We estimate Woolworths’ online sales to account for 8% of its top line by the end of the decade, up from around 5% currently. In Australia, we estimate 3% of groceries are currently sold online.

Meal kit deliveries are becoming increasingly popular, also competing with supermarkets, but here the growth is from an exceptionally low base of about 0.5% market share, and due to the higher cost, meal kits are unlikely to penetrate all consumer segments. We expect the channel to remain a fringe player.

Fair Value and Profit Drivers | by Johannes Faul Updated Feb 21, 2024

Our fair value estimate is AUD 27.50 per share. We do not expect Woolworths to widen its margins toward similar levels it had enjoyed before 2016, as the Australian supermarket sector has structurally changed with the reintroduction of the discount channel. Aldi is taking market share from the established supermarkets, intensifying competition among them for the remaining market. We expect supermarkets to compete by passing on efficiency gains or cost savings to consumers through price cuts, instead of expanding operating margins and potentially losing share.

As a result, we expect Woolworths to successfully defend its market share in food retailing at around 36% in the long term against key competitor Coles and other grocers, but this will be achieved by passing on efficiency gains to its customers, capping operating margins.

Our fair value estimate implies a forward fiscal 2024 price/earnings ratio of 19, an enterprise value/EBITDA of 6, and a free cash flow yield of 5%. Australian supermarkets are the most significant determinant of our discounted cash flow model, with average annual revenue growth of around 4% during the next five years. We forecast group EBT margins to remain relatively stable from fiscal 2026. Despite continued capital investment, we expect return on invested capital to average 12% through 2028, compared with our cost of capital assumption of 7.2%, providing support for our opinion that Woolworths has a narrow economic moat.

Risk and Uncertainty | by Johannes Faul Updated Feb 21, 2024

Woolworths gains comfort from its market-leading operating margins in the core Australian supermarkets segment. However, several competitors could raise the competitive bar: Arch rival Coles supermarkets; number three discount supermarket chain Aldi; Wesfarmers with Australia's largest discount department store operations; the possibility of U.S.-based Costco stepping up its investments in the Australian store network; and potentially Amazon Fresh disrupting the industry in the longer term.

Besides a potential loss of market share to peers, intensifying price competition poses a threat for the industry. Low food price inflation below wage and rent hikes may result in operating margin pressure. From a macroeconomic standpoint, a prolonged period of weak consumer spending growth might weigh on earnings.

We conclude that environmental, social, and governance risks for the retailer are immaterial to our fair value estimate and are well mitigated by existing processes and procedures.

Woolworths mitigates its risk associated with unmaintainable sourcing with policies and procedures that are expected to be complied with by employees and suppliers and are overseen by the Audit, Risk Management, and Compliance Committee. Examples of policies include the Woolworths Group Animal Welfare Policy and Responsible Sourcing Standards.

In managing the ESG risk associated with Woolworths’ carbon footprint, Woolworths has made several commitments including using only recyclable, reusable, or compostable packaging for own brand products by 2023 and committing to be net carbon positive by 2050. Initiatives to achieve these include the rollout of REDcycle bins within retail stores, and the installation of LED lighting and centrally controlled air-conditioning.

ESG risk associated with the retailing of tobacco products within Woolworths retail brands is largely mitigated by the heavy taxes imposed on these products by the Australian government.

Capital Allocation | by Johannes Faul Updated Feb 21, 2024

We ascribe Woolworths an Exemplary capital allocation rating. The balance sheet is sound, investments are exceptional, and distributions to shareholders are appropriate.

Woolworths is a defensive retailer which faces minimal revenue cyclicality because virtually all of group operating income is derived through grocery retailing.

Woolworths has a moderate level of operating leverage within its cost base. Rental expenses, the second largest operating cost, represent a significant portion of the cost base and are driven by long-term store leases that typically have minimal ability to change in the short term, whereas staff costs, the largest operating cost, are sticky in the short term but can be flexed up and down to deal with increases and decreases in work load.

Woolworths’ balance sheet is in excellent shape. Financial leverage, as measured by debt/EBITDA, is minimal, and we estimate a highly maintainable three-year forward average of 1.2. The weighted average maturity of its debt is around four years. As long as sales increase, Woolworths also enjoys the benefit of operating with negative working capital as customers predominantly make payments immediately in store and suppliers are typically on extended payment terms.

Woolworths' investments consistently generate economic profits, and these are tailored toward strengthening the supermarkets business’ economic moat. Investments in new stores and store renewals can leverage the scale and cost advantages that the supermarkets business enjoys while investments in online channels and fulfilment methods have the benefit of making Woolworths’ competitive advantages more resilient to the threat from other online retailers.

Woolworths is a relatively low growth business, and a high level of distributions to shareholders is recommended given the reduced avenues to invest capital at a rate above the cost of capital. Woolworths’ historical payout ratio of 73% is highly appropriate and value maximizing for shareholders given the high level of franking credits the business generates.

Woolworths also appropriately returns surplus capital from the divestiture of noncore assets to its shareholders. This is exemplified by the divestiture of the retail fuel network to EG Group in 2019 and return of capital to shareholders via a AUD 1.7 billion off-market share buyback that utilized excess franking credits.

Arizona
Added 7 months ago

I keep hovering over the buy button on WOW, to top up my holdings.

With the Morningstar rating and Simply Wall Street valuing at $28.27, I have been hesitating.

On the other hand there are a range of valuations covered here on Strawman that are North of the current share price.

A quick glance at the charts, WOW shares appear to be at around 3 year lows.

Its tempting here.

11

Bear77
Added 7 months ago

As usual, there are reasons behind the SP drop with WOW. That's not to say that the SP hasn't overshot to the low side; it may have, or the market may actually be pricing WOW relatively correctly; time will tell.

One of the reasons is that Coles appear to be outperforming Woolworths at this point in time - which changes every now and then - and part of that must be due to sub-par management by their CEO, Brad Banducci, who, as has been noted here already, is quite arrogant and possible not as effective as a better manager might be at driving Woolworths' competitive advantages and competing with Coles as well as a better manager might.

The good news is that Brad is half way out the door. After eight years in the top job, Mr Banducci will be replaced by Amanda Bardwell, the company's head of loyalty and e-commerce. Ms Bardwell, who will take over as CEO in September, is the first woman to lead the company since its founding. Coles already has a woman in the top job, Leah Weckert, image below, and she is clearly doing a good job seeing as Coles' March quarter was clearly superior to Woolworths' March quarter.

0667edbcb103915993d934ba7f0a0f007daf1f.png

55f0bdc58b6e88420b2cd653d0b11b6f8c2ca3.png

Leah took over from Steven Cain in May last year (2023).

The job appears to have aged her a little already:

3aa64017754613084d6fe124260110bf0f6331.png

Or maybe she's just stopped dying her hair. Source: Executive leadership team | Coles Group

I reckon they were trying to promote the youth and vigour of the new CEO last year, and now they want to stress the experience and steady hand on the rudder, so are promoting her as a more mature leader, but perhaps I'm reading too much into that...

Further Reading: New Coles Group boss Leah Weckert is a case study in how to develop a CEO (afr.com) [01-Feb-2023]

Now back to Woolies. Below is Brad and his successor (from September this year), Amanda Bardwell:

67c1899de0b372badbbc5d19a6a6b7f462e99f.png

Some history and further details on Amanda here: Who is Amanda Bardwell? New Woolworths CEO revealed after Brad Banducci resigns - and how much she is paid | Daily Mail Online [21-Feb-2024]

So perhaps the market isn't yet pricing in a more competitive Woolworths under new management, and that's likely because (a) she doesn't take over the reigns until September, and (b) being an internal promotion from a less important role, there is no senior management track record to look at yet with Amanda. Personally I'm looking forward to the change; it will be good to have women running Australia's two largest consumer staples companies.

Good luck for the future Brad!

21eed12cf753aed327ab538555727030fefd16.png

Hopefully he'll get more time with his family, including his dog:

c8cfb914b0a8e50c15b6c42794ae19beaa3fa3.png

Not sure if that qualifies as cruelty to animals, but the dog seems to be thinking along those lines...

86101056dfa09357d9da465a012b3bfc105e16.png

Further Reading: WOW ASX: CEO Brad Banducci quits Woolworths amid food price review (afr.com) [21-Feb-2024]

Excerpt: "The departure comes days after a Four Corners interview on the ABC in which Mr Banducci criticised former competition regulator Rod Sims before asking for those comments not to be used. When the request was denied, Mr Banducci attempted to end the interview."

Asked about Mr Banducci, Anthony Albanese pointedly noted there was “a great deal of frustration out there from Australians who hear from farmers that they’re getting less for their products, but don’t see that evidence when they get to the checkout”.

10

mikebrisy
Added 7 months ago

On analyst views, yesterday's response continues the scene that was pretty much set by the trading update in Feb, which dropped the SP from $36 to less than $33, and an ongoing gradual slide from there.

The analysts were largely expecting the result, as can be seen from the overnight re-vals, albeit there have been minor further adjustments down, generally:

  • UBS from $33.50 to $32.50; having cut from $36.00 in Feb.
  • Ords unchanged at $27.50; having not changed in Feb
  • Macquarie unchanged at $35.00; Having cut form $37.00 in Feb to $36:00 and then having cut again to $35:00 pre-result
  • Morgan Stanley unchanged at $32.00; having cut from $34.00 in Feb.
  • Goldman Sachs from $40.40 to $39.40; having cut from $42.30 in Feb.


Overall, consensus (n=15 marketscreenercom) was cut from $38.26 to $35.80 in Feb. Based on this week's (so far) we've gone to $34.60.

So, the analysts priced in about 2/3rd of the fall in Feb and about 1/3rd over night, in round figures.

The current average of $34.60 represents a range of ($27.50 - $39.90). Not all have necessarily updated yet.

Of course, analyst views don't necessarily tell you anything, but I think it is interesting to see how the two announcements have been digested by the analysts and the market.

At time of writing with $WOW at $30.76, that's a total drop of about -15% since the Feb Update, whereas the analysts' average has dropped -9%.

Overall, that's consistent with the pattern that the market tends to over-react to good news and bad news in either direction, with analysts tend to follow the market, but with a damped response function at the average.

Of course, there are a few other factors that could draw out the price recovery including:

  • Government Review into Supermarkets to run through to Feb 2025, with interim milestones
  • CEO succession, as covered by @Bear77
  • FY results - what does that say about the relative competitiveness of $WOW and $COL("$COL wins the March Q" is the dominant headline in the press)
  • Marco-economy: inflation/cost of living continuing to have customer trading down


Even though I took my first bite yesterday, keen to nab the price dip, I've kept 50% of my power dry. As I've learned before ($RMD, $IEL),... the downgrade cycle can take a while to play out.

Things are possiblly being set for later 2024 as a story that will become personified as the battle between two new CEOs.


OK, signing off for the week. Off to $WOW to do the weekend shopping! ;-)

Disc: Held in RL

20

edgescape
Added 7 months ago

WOW has a ROE of 30% which was pointed out somewhere in the news that it was higher than the banks

And yet the share price is still suffering.

Guess another example of not to rely solely on ROE as a driver of company growth

11

Wini
Added 7 months ago

@edgescape there was a great conversation between @Strawman and Scott Phillips on the Motley Fool podcast the other week about how using return on equity alone can be a very misleading metric as it doesn't take into the account the capital structure of the business. WOW has a big chunk of debt and an intensive working capital model meaning returns on capital/assets are much more modest than equity.

I suspect the Greens senator knew that with his line of questioning, not to mention a 2% net margin isn't that headline grabbing either.

20

UlladullaDave
Added 7 months ago

You can have an ROE of 100%, but at the end of the day if you can't deploy any capital at that rate it is meaningless. WOW runs on negative WC and uses debt – I would think the debt is a feature not a bug. ROE has lots of shortcomings, but if you accept that the business can continue to operate with that capital structure (and why couldn't it in this case) then it's reasonably useful. When you pull the balance sheet apart a bit and get rid of the leases and the indefinite life intangibles (trying to get something that looks like incremental ROIC) you end up with a business that runs on OPM – namely the suppliers. Which is probably why they are always complaining about dealing with WOW. Hard to argue this company doesn't have buckets of flex in it.

The DuPont model is helpful for understanding how these things are interconnected. It's a bit old school now.0f93286917a3d2d2527eeeb98297cffb16e0f3.png

20

RhinoInvestor
Added 7 months ago

Just looked at the WOW share price from Feb 2016 when Mr Banducci became the CEO. Up about 50% over the 8 years and if you had timed the market well could have been a double back in mid 2021 (applying rule of 72 that would have been about a 14% p.a. Share price appreciation excl fully franked dividends so I’m guessing probably closer to 20% p.a).

IMHO it’s a pretty good return for something that should really only be growing at around the rate of inflation / population growth +/- a little bit of duopoly market share shift.

I also think the all the food co’s did a pretty good job managing really large workforces through COVID and keeping the greater population fed and watered despite a few TP shortages from time to time.

Not to mention they also spun out EDV the home of Dan Murphys, BWS and others during that time.

DISC: No longer holding (got out with about a 7.5% annualised return and a bunch of EDV shares which I still hold but aren’t doing anything special) but still use their online shopping every week.

dc2e725dd57c2790319f9b3322b2fd1007e227.png

13