Forum Topics RMD RMD Thin and blind

Pinned straw:

Added 2 months ago

Interesting addition to all the chatter on weight loss drugs. Will be fun to see if this alters pundits views on the relative merits of weight loss drugs.

Like all preliminary data, may well not survive further substantial analysis but it was a large cohort. At the risk of stating the obvious of you look hard enough for side effects, the law of large numbers states that you will encounter an increase in adverse event in one domain that is higher than expected. But people are usually unwilling to increase their risk of going blind

Drugs like Ozempic, Wegovy linked to eye condition causing vision loss


https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/article-abstract/2820255

Nnyck777
a month ago

Interesting side note I have have a few local GPS sending me patients to check for NAION due to Ozempic use. GP caution in prescribing increasing. I have also had a particularly bad exacerbation for diabetic maculopathy last week which also may be linked to GLP1 use. These drugs are serious. I am astounded that anyone would take them casually for weight loss.

CPAP machines safe for now!

18

Chagsy
a month ago

Interesting @Nnyck777

I know its anecdote, but I had a patient with the most terrible run of pancreatitis as a side effect of Ozempic. And the next patient singing its praises about how it had helped her shed 30kg and she no longer needed weight loss surgery and it was a miracle!

Its going to be fascinating to see how this plays out.

C

23

Arizona
a month ago

@Nnyck777 From my laymans perspective, its really great to get your take on the situation from the coal face.

The idea that, at scale, a drug is the route to weight loss jars with me.

Then there is the side effects, known and unknown....



13
neke86_
2 months ago

Am I reading this correctly that the found neuropathy in 20 of 197 patients?

8

GazD
2 months ago

@neke86_ tying myself in knots reading these numbers in the dark before my kids get up but 8.9% was the number I took away over 36 months. The break down is by those treated for obesity and those treated for DM but the effect is consistent over both groups… if this is real it’s going to be absolutely massive… reminds me of the concerns around clotting with astra zeneca vaccine early days when we weren’t sure if it was real or not… share price of novo pretty much shrugged but I would be very concerned if I held.

14

UlladullaDave
2 months ago

The difference between this and the AZ vaccine is that was a double blind study that showed a strong causal link, this is a retrospective study that shows no causality only an association. If 10% of obese people with type 2 diabetes were going blind after starting a course of Ozempic I don't think we'd be waiting to read about it in a JAMA paper.

I'm not saying there isn't a causal link, quite frankly I have no idea either way, but for it to be meaningful they will need to use the results of a study that is powered to prove causality.

18

Solvetheriddle
2 months ago

I tend to agree with @UlladullaDave , as a RMD shareholder of course i would love for the drugs to have problems, but its only a hope i think. having said that dropping weight from 130kg to 80 kg in a few months, eg, i think would cause massive strains on your body and there will be cases of crash and burn, unfortunately. dont feel that it is enough to kill the base case that weight loss will eventually become ubiquitous.

15

GazD
2 months ago

Early days @UlladullaDave there was absolutely doubt about causation with AZ. Cerebral sinus thrombosis is incredibly uncommon in the population but was also pretty rare with AZ and took some time to establish particularly when complicated by the presence of corona virus itself, a greater risk for thrombosis. I do agree however that the current evidence is not strong for causation, if it did turn that way though… as for reading about it in the papers not in JAMA there is plenty of precedent for unexpected problems taking some time to recognise. Again this is a tricky group to study with lots of potential confounders. Give it time. Also agree no idea if it’s real. Yet…

13