Forum Topics NCK NCK Macquarie’s view

Pinned straw:

Added 5 months ago

I picked this up from @Jimmy’s regular News Summary DJ Australian Equities Roundup (10/07/2024). I thought I’d move it here for future reference.

“Nick Scali keeps its bull at Macquarie, where analysts say Australian spending on home furniture remained resilient at the end of fiscal 2024 despite pressure on consumer spending. They tell clients in a note that the proportion of June consumer spending dedicated to furniture was largely in line with the year-earlier period. Foot traffic to Nick Scali's furniture stores in fiscal 2H also looks broadly in line with a year earlier, they say. Macquarie keeps an outperform rating and A$16.10 target price on the stock, which is up 0.7% at A$13.27. (stuart.condie@wsj.com)”

mikebrisy
Added 5 months ago

@Rick music to my ears. I have recently topped up $NCK based on the current weakness, given that my portfolio is gushing cash with ongoing selling down $ALU and exit from $RMD and $LOV.

Despite a segment of the market hit hard with interest rates being higher for longer, a segment of homeowners are still experiencing the wealth effect of strong property prices. In addition, there are the strong immigration numbers, albeit only a small portion of this will be $NCK customers.

With the SP pullback, I'm less peeved than I was at not getting as much as I wanted in the cap raise.

18

Solvetheriddle
Added 5 months ago

@mikebrisy @Rick yes i have topped up on what i stuffed up on not getting in the raise. not wanting to overplay the macro (because it is hard to predict) I am aware that the US consumer has finally run down their C19 surplus and the Aussie consumer still has some runway here. US consumer stocks near 52-week lows, NKE, SBUX, FND, POOL, LULU, ULTA., and even the great LVMH, (some have stock-specific issues) but since US leads us in this case, maybe not out of the woods yet. --still a buyer on any pullback.

19

Mujo
Added 5 months ago

Thanks for the reminder @Solvetheriddle i’ve been meaning to look at POOL for ages and saw fairlight (fund manager) has bought ULTA too.

NKE i think has quite a few issues moving forward from competition, interesting to see how it goes.

Consumer discretionary could still fall a fair way further i think if the worst happens.

10

Rick
Added 5 months ago

Hey @mikebrisy I just read that you’ve sold down Lovisa lately. I may have missed some conversation here on Strawman, but I’m curious to know why? I’ve bought and sold Lovisa a few times myself, but I don’t think they are overvalued at the moment, so still holding.

12

Rick
Added 5 months ago

I found your LOV divestment straw @mikebrisy https://strawman.com/reports/LOV/all?inc=26252

Lovisa only makes up 1% of our IRL portfolio at the moment. With a McNiven’s valuation I have it returning over 10% per year at the current share price, IF (and only IF) they can maintain a ROE of 98%.

13

mikebrisy
Added 5 months ago

@Rick - yes, it is a slightly convoluted story, and I'll capture the main elements. It was a slightly unusual exit for me, because the thesis is by no means broken, and I would hold again in future.

There were two elements to the decision: 1) company-specific and 2) my portfolio management.

1) Company-specific

  • I entered $LOV only as recently as June-23, at $18.61 in RL
  • My latest view on valuation was $30 ($23-$37), however the scenarios north of $30 required a strong store build out
  • In June I estimated the number of stores to be around 900, not in line with my high value scenarios (I did a deep data trawl of their store list from their website. It turned out to be amazingly accurate, because they only recently announced their 900th store opening!)
  • My analysis indicated that 1) they haven't started rolling out in China and 2) they've opened very few new stores in the USA. Both markets are key to my higher growth scenarios
  • Then, Victor announced that's he's leaving next year, and I was underwhelmed by his replacement. Victor's experience at rolling out Zara in China supported my conviction that $LOV would advance and be successful in China. Its not a market for the uninitiated. Perhaps he was unable to roll forward his eye-watering remuneration package, but maybe he has also have been in the seat a couple of years and his own conviction has waned. He makes a motza only if he knocks the global rollout out of the park. Has he lost faith in the upside?
  • Consumer discretionary is still on the nose globally, even though $LOV benefits from the "lipstick effect". Still, I also cant see LFL knocking it out of the park.


In summary, when I consider the multiple $LOV is trading on, there is a chance that if it underperforms (or if it doesn't "beat"), the SP could get hit pretty hard. Too many "talking heads" are promoting it once more, and the contrarian in my always hates that.

Given all these factors and what I have to believe to get numbers justifying >$34, I felt that I had to put $LOV on the block, and consider if I could deploy the capital better elsewhere.


2) Portfolio Considerations

My conviction holdings in retail exposure are $NCK and $BRG. I am prepared to have only a limited proportion of my portfolio in discretionary retail, and $NCK was where I wanted to add, as my RL position was too small.

I have been prepared to let go quality holdings where I see limited potential for upside over a 1-2 year horizon based on valuation ($LOV, $WTC, and $RMD). At the right price, I would consider adding these back, as the thesis for each is intact.

I also want to increase my portfolio exposure to some higher risk / more speculative ideas ($BOT-high conviction; $BIO-starter pack) to replace some of my failed ideas ($RFT) and ideas where I have lost conviction that they will ever become giants ($ALC, $AVA, $DSE - all recently exited).

Price weakness on $AD8 was an opportunity to re-enter this one - having sold it last year at $17 was a mistake (although I convinced myself at the time it was the right decision).

I've also been RL accumulating $CAT, as it breaks through the inflection point and is a global category leader with a CEO who is hitting the straps.

Conclusion

In offloading $LOV, I pocketed a very nice 10 month return, it stays firmly on my watchlist and I'll be watching what happens post the FY-result. But it also freed up some capital for me to add to high conviction ideas ($BOT, $NCK)

Apologies for the long-winded answer, but the "sell" on $LOV was a little more complicated than making the decision on its own merits. (You can also look at my post "Divestment Decision", where I gave a less fullsome explanation.)

18

Rick
Added 5 months ago

Thank you @mikebrisy for explaining your thoughts on Lovisa and some other stocks your have divested from. A better idea is always a valid reason to divest from a good business. You can hardly go wrong focusing on the best ROI on your own cash! :)

11

mikebrisy
Added 5 months ago

@Rick Agreed.

One thing I have tried to do as an investor is not anchor on the price, nor feel "comfortable" or "safe" where large returns have accumulated over time (e.g. $PNV) or - equally - the opposite where losses have started stacking up (e.g., $IEL)

Rather, I try to bring a mentality of what is the return over 2-5 years from today, and if the risk-reward looks better elsewhere, to be ruthless in selling even the most cherished companies.

This is hard. Really hard. Like many, I imagine, I get attached to my favourite holdings. But I have proven to myself that I can do it. For example, in March I sold all of $WTC (my most cherished stock, because of what its done for me over 8 years, since I entered it at $5.33), simply because the forward risk-reward as I've assessed it, doesn't stack up. I'd love to own it again, and I will when I am presented with a <$88 buying opportunity, adjusted for time passed.

This is not to be confused with selling down winners! That is something I used to do, and I have foregone great returns as a result. It is, as you say, a decision based purely on a view of the point forward ROI. The thought experiment is, sell your entire portfolio at the close. What would you buy at the open? (Impractical, of course, but that's the mindset I strive for).

Of course, I will get many of these calls wrong. But at the end of the day, I invest a lot of time in developing my views on value, upside and downside and if I am not prepared to act on my own work and back myself, then I might as well buy $VGS, or give the money to a fund manager and play golf (I don't) or get a real job.

21

Karmast
Added 5 months ago

Thanks @mikebrisy. I like the thinking and application and find myself nodding in furious agreement with all of this...

9