Forum Topics RMD RMD Industry/competitors

Pinned straw:

Added 5 months ago

I have been reflecting on whether or not I have prematurely exited RMD and whether I should get back in. It is an ongoing battle, I have to say.

This article in the WSJ yesterday, 15 Jul 2024, crystallises a different perspective as to why RMD’s single product moat is likely to continue to be under pressure from obesity-related drugs.

This is the same approach AVH is taking in the current study that it is undertaking that treating vitiligo with RECELL GO will lead to better mental health benefits to prove to the insurers that using RECELL GO has got broader benefits/cost savings beyond the immediate “cosmetic” improvement of treating vitiligo.

I have images of a group of vikings carrying a battering ram to punch a hole in the castle moat .... maybe I am thinking of Asterix??

Article in full is below.

Disc: Not Held in SM or IRL

-----------

Whether millions of people will be able to afford one of the hot new weight-loss drugs could hinge on whether they cure the sleep apnea of people like Damon Sedgwick.

Sedgwick, a technology business analyst in Sydney, enrolled in a clinical trial in 2022 to test whether taking weekly injections of Eli Lilly’s anti-obesity drug Zepbound would alleviate the sleep apnea that had plagued his nights for years.

The medical thesis: Hefty weight loss from the drug would help open the airways of Sedgwick and other study subjects, reducing the frequent stops and starts to breathing while they slept.

The business thesis: Proving health benefits of drugs such as Zepbound beyond weight loss could persuade more health insurers to finally reimburse the expensive drugs, opening the door to billions of dollars in more sales.

Ozempic, Zepbound and their GLP-1 cousins have become wildly popular, ringing up more than a million prescriptions a week. But many people can’t get the medicines because their health plans don’t cover them and the drugs would cost upward of $1,300 a month out of pocket.

Health plans have traditionally shied away from paying for drugs that would help people to lose weight. Many plans have balked at reimbursing the new anti-obesity medicines because of cost.

Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, the drugs’ makers, are betting insurers that have been resistant to covering weight-loss treatment will be more inclined to reimburse for other uses. That is why the companies are sponsoring studies evaluating the medicines for a range of applications, from treating heart, kidney and liver disease to Alzheimer’s and sleep apnea.

“It builds this wall of evidence,” said Derek Asay, senior vice president of government strategy and federal accounts at Lilly. “It helps give that reason to believe there’s more than weight loss here.”

The studies are among the most closely watched by patients, doctors and investors.

Validation that the drugs work in sleep apnea alone would mean, Jefferies analysts estimate, $5 billion in additional sales for Zepbound. For tens of thousands of people seeking to take one of the drugs, it would also mean the difference between filling a prescription or not.

Positive study results could also transform care. In sleep apnea, said Dr. Ron Grunstein, a professor of sleep medicine at the Woolcock Institute of Medical Research in Australia who helped run the Lilly-funded study, “You could argue this is just as important as the discovery of CPAP therapy 40 odd years ago,” referring to continuous positive airway pressure.

The efforts are already gaining traction. In March, the Food and Drug Administration approved Wegovy to reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes, based on a Novo Nordisk-sponsored study finding a 20% reduction in cardiovascular risk.

This cleared the way for some Medicare prescription-drug plans to pay for Wegovy’s use for the first time in patients with cardiovascular disease, though federal law still bars Medicare from covering the drugs for weight loss alone.

Some 3.6 million Medicare beneficiaries, about a quarter of the Medicare population, had both cardiovascular disease and excess weight—which could make them eligible for Wegovy coverage, health-policy nonprofit KFF estimated.

Meantime, insurers such as Sanford Health Plan, a nonprofit based in Sioux Falls, S.D., with about 200,000 members, are exploring covering the drugs for preventing heart attacks and strokes in people with cardiovascular disease.

“I do foresee more purchasers opting to include those medications as part of a comprehensive benefit program,” said Dr. Tommy Ibrahim, Sanford’s chief executive, though employers may ask people to try less expensive options or get prior approval first.

The new Wegovy heart use will lead to $3.2 billion in more yearly sales, BMO Capital Markets analysts estimate.

Originally developed for diabetes, the main ingredients of Novo’s Wegovy, Lilly’s Zepbound and related drugs work by mimicking gut hormones and suppressing appetite. The resulting weight loss, researchers, the drugs’ makers and patients surmised, could have other health benefits.

Take sleep apnea. About 30 million Americans have the disease, an interruption of breathing that can cause near-term fatigue and long-term complications such as heart problems if untreated.

Obesity is a common cause because fat deposits around the neck and mouth can narrow a person’s airway. Losing weight can ease or eliminate sleep apnea. Weight loss from bariatric surgery, for instance, can improve the condition.

Many patients use a CPAP machine—to get the oxygen they need. But the machines’ bulky masks can be uncomfortable.

Lilly launched sleep-apnea testing after seeing evidence tirzepatide—the drug that would become Zepbound—could treat obesity.

Sedgwick, 53 years old, enrolled in the Lilly-funded study of Zepbound, seeking both to lose weight and relieve his sleep apnea.

At the start, he spent an overnight at the Woolcock Institute, a sleep and respiratory clinic in Sydney, for a baseline evaluation. Researchers attached devices to his body to monitor his sleep and breathing, and recorded him with cameras and microphones as he tried to sleep. He couldn’t use a CPAP machine.

“Awful,” was how he described trying to sleep that night. Researchers determined he had severe sleep apnea.

He started losing 4 or 5 pounds a week. At his next overnight sleep-clinic visit, after about five months on Zepbound, researchers found that Sedgwick’s sleep apnea had all but disappeared—so much so that they recommended he stop using the CPAP machine.

By the end of the study in the fall of 2023, Sedgwick had lost more than 70 pounds and showed no signs of sleep apnea at the final overnight clinic visit. On a recent trip, he didn’t bring along his CPAP machine. “It was good not to travel with one,” he said.

Across the nearly 470 patients in two Lilly studies, Zepbound reduced the severity of sleep apnea by more than 60% compared with a placebo, according to the company. Many study subjects on Zepbound returned to normal breathing.

Lilly has applied to the FDA to approve Zepbound’s use to treat sleep apnea. A decision could come by the end of this year.

Solvetheriddle
Added 5 months ago

@jcmleng I've reduced my RMD holding in half, it was a large top 10 holding, i still hold but middle rank.

apparently, Barons had an RMD-supportive article.

re the weight loss drugs, i think you should look forward. things will change

  1. They are expensive = they will get cheaper and maybe a lot over several years
  2. injections are not easy===there will be easy to take pills in due course
  3. the drugs are supply constrained===there will be much more coming


these are risks on the horizon, not tomorrow, but i can't help but feel the momentum is one way.


14
mikebrisy
Added 5 months ago

@jcmleng I also read that WSJ article (this morning in bed with my first coffee.)

I also sold out of $RMD a couple of weeks ago on the back of the $LLY news. This was because I wanted to dispassionately reconsider all the information and then decide whether and when to re-enter.

When the GLP-1 vs. OSA story and short thesis broke in mid-2023 I was one of the many voices who made the case why CPAP would not be materially impacted. Without rehashing all the arguments, in essence one key argument was that the large under-served market remains attractive, with $RMD the global market leader, even if GLP-1's (and other treatments that will doubtlessly follow) lop 10-20% off the market over time. There is of course more to the Bull Case, but in the interests of brevity, I'll leave it there.

When I re-read some of what I wrote and thought, I realise that it contained an endowment bias. I owned the stock and was not perhaps not as objective as I might otherwise have been. Equally, I have the self awareness to realise that now I don't own the stock, and perhaps the converse applies.

Having spent a bit of time going back over various research notes and articles - both BULL and BEAR - I have come to the decision that I'm not so sure what side of the argument to land on. Over time, faced with an affordable pill with good efficacy and acceptable safety (open questions still on "affordable", "efficacious", and "safe") why would I chose to wear a mask and be strapped to a machine while I sleep?

GLP-1's have triggered a revolution in the pharmaceutical industry. Of course, there are the headlines we are reading every day about clinical trial results and approvals for various indications. But what lies hidden is the huge allocation of research capital now going into this area, and the related areas that will spawn new chemical entities, treatments and indications over the years and decades ahead, as well as a continuous stream of newsflow - good and bad (I saw a similar phenomenon in pharma. when I worked in the industry in the 1990s and ACE inhinitors were the big thing for cardiovascular disease, and again a little later with Statins.)

I don't know how this is going to play out for OSA. Maybe continued strong performance of $RMD will shake off these concerns and a new equillibrium will be found. Or perhaps with each new study, each new approved OSA indication, each new pill-reimbursement agreement, the market opportunity erodes over time, until the sun sets on CPAP as the standard of care for OSA? I'm not saying that it is my base case, but there are now plausible BEAR scenarios that I wasn't considering a year ago, and they effect 5+ years earnings growth rate AND terminal value. I can see they materially impact my valuations - without even updating my model

In conclusion, my conviction on $RMD is significantly reduced, and I'm therefore no longer confident that its the best place for my capital. Of course, in reaching this conclusion I recognise that for several years (if I stick to this view) it is entirely possible that I will now be a spectator at some wonderful operational performances, as margins continue to improve and revenues grow, ever-driving the SP higher. Such is life, as an infamous Australian once said.

As a footnote, I have plotted the P/E evolution of $RMD over recent years, and I think this tells an interesting story:

e51aa7efdaab4be427fd933c4bf81abb94f644.png

On the graph I have placed my usual "eyeball quartile bands" covering the period leading up to the "pandemic sugar hit". $RMD traded in a fairly volatile range of 30 - 55 in round terms from mid-2017 to mid-2021.

Late 2021 to early 2022 was the "pandemic sugar hit" and the assistance provided by Phillips recall.

Mid-2022 to mid-2023 was suppressed below the mid-point of the band because of the supply chain challenges which suppressed gross margin.

Mid-2023 onwards is the current story. The age of GLP-1. Although we are only a year into it, are we entering new territory (P/E 20 - 35)? In this possible new era, the premium of being a global market leader in healthcare is discounted by the spectre of GLP-1, and the question of whether CPAP will be replaced by a pill.

My investment thesis "when to sell" has always considered that an alternative treatment for OSA to CPAP might emerge. I don't claim to know the answer to this question, but by the time I do, it will likely be too late to preserve capital. It is a risk I don't have to take, so I'm not going to take it.

I remain on the sidelines, and $RMD remains on my watchlist.

Disc: Not held

21