Pinned straw:
@jcmleng I've reduced my RMD holding in half, it was a large top 10 holding, i still hold but middle rank.
apparently, Barons had an RMD-supportive article.
re the weight loss drugs, i think you should look forward. things will change
these are risks on the horizon, not tomorrow, but i can't help but feel the momentum is one way.
@jcmleng I also read that WSJ article (this morning in bed with my first coffee.)
I also sold out of $RMD a couple of weeks ago on the back of the $LLY news. This was because I wanted to dispassionately reconsider all the information and then decide whether and when to re-enter.
When the GLP-1 vs. OSA story and short thesis broke in mid-2023 I was one of the many voices who made the case why CPAP would not be materially impacted. Without rehashing all the arguments, in essence one key argument was that the large under-served market remains attractive, with $RMD the global market leader, even if GLP-1's (and other treatments that will doubtlessly follow) lop 10-20% off the market over time. There is of course more to the Bull Case, but in the interests of brevity, I'll leave it there.
When I re-read some of what I wrote and thought, I realise that it contained an endowment bias. I owned the stock and was not perhaps not as objective as I might otherwise have been. Equally, I have the self awareness to realise that now I don't own the stock, and perhaps the converse applies.
Having spent a bit of time going back over various research notes and articles - both BULL and BEAR - I have come to the decision that I'm not so sure what side of the argument to land on. Over time, faced with an affordable pill with good efficacy and acceptable safety (open questions still on "affordable", "efficacious", and "safe") why would I chose to wear a mask and be strapped to a machine while I sleep?
GLP-1's have triggered a revolution in the pharmaceutical industry. Of course, there are the headlines we are reading every day about clinical trial results and approvals for various indications. But what lies hidden is the huge allocation of research capital now going into this area, and the related areas that will spawn new chemical entities, treatments and indications over the years and decades ahead, as well as a continuous stream of newsflow - good and bad (I saw a similar phenomenon in pharma. when I worked in the industry in the 1990s and ACE inhinitors were the big thing for cardiovascular disease, and again a little later with Statins.)
I don't know how this is going to play out for OSA. Maybe continued strong performance of $RMD will shake off these concerns and a new equillibrium will be found. Or perhaps with each new study, each new approved OSA indication, each new pill-reimbursement agreement, the market opportunity erodes over time, until the sun sets on CPAP as the standard of care for OSA? I'm not saying that it is my base case, but there are now plausible BEAR scenarios that I wasn't considering a year ago, and they effect 5+ years earnings growth rate AND terminal value. I can see they materially impact my valuations - without even updating my model
In conclusion, my conviction on $RMD is significantly reduced, and I'm therefore no longer confident that its the best place for my capital. Of course, in reaching this conclusion I recognise that for several years (if I stick to this view) it is entirely possible that I will now be a spectator at some wonderful operational performances, as margins continue to improve and revenues grow, ever-driving the SP higher. Such is life, as an infamous Australian once said.
As a footnote, I have plotted the P/E evolution of $RMD over recent years, and I think this tells an interesting story:
On the graph I have placed my usual "eyeball quartile bands" covering the period leading up to the "pandemic sugar hit". $RMD traded in a fairly volatile range of 30 - 55 in round terms from mid-2017 to mid-2021.
Late 2021 to early 2022 was the "pandemic sugar hit" and the assistance provided by Phillips recall.
Mid-2022 to mid-2023 was suppressed below the mid-point of the band because of the supply chain challenges which suppressed gross margin.
Mid-2023 onwards is the current story. The age of GLP-1. Although we are only a year into it, are we entering new territory (P/E 20 - 35)? In this possible new era, the premium of being a global market leader in healthcare is discounted by the spectre of GLP-1, and the question of whether CPAP will be replaced by a pill.
My investment thesis "when to sell" has always considered that an alternative treatment for OSA to CPAP might emerge. I don't claim to know the answer to this question, but by the time I do, it will likely be too late to preserve capital. It is a risk I don't have to take, so I'm not going to take it.
I remain on the sidelines, and $RMD remains on my watchlist.
Disc: Not held