Forum Topics JIN JIN Financials

Pinned straw:

Last edited 3 months ago

Strong results as expected given the favorable jackpot run:

35ab6afa4b41c5b3deb83465fcf24ea02a79fc.png

Finally step up in TLC fee now in the results, UK growing well, Canada a bit soft but appears to be a focus.

Hard to fault the results in any way and FCF of just under $53M. $68M in cash and about a billion-market cap. Accelerating buyback when sensible.

Not overly cheap but still results given results and execution - issue would be a slowing jackpot outlook. Interesting to see if digital penetration continues in Australian lotteries and how SAAS and managed service growth looks in a year or 2.

SudMav
Added 3 months ago

So with the recent announcements out today, I'm not sure why the stock in this one has tanked so hard.

Revenue is up and margin on tickets will be increasing on their page, lottery sales and managed services industries are growing and operating cash flow is up 9%. Growth for next year is expected to be modest but should be higher than this year. Even if there is a normalisation back to 40-45 jackpots per year, they still managed to deliver TTV growth in the previous years with this number of jackpots (as you can see in the Presentation extract below)

947f7ebc82d528e677cd44f294b49613933196.png

The impact of the Canadian rebalance of contracts is likely to be easily covered by the other growth in the business as this segment is only 5% of the TTV.

I really believe that the SAAS model is the way of the future for major charitable lotteries, and JIN would be well placed to pick up more of these home lottery style contracts in the future.

On the flipside, I am happier as a shareholder that the lower price of this stock should provide some better value under the share buyback scheme.

I feel like either I am missing some of the picture here, or the PE has been clawed back to reflect more modest growth opportunities. Can anyone share some further insights?

14

Strawman
Added 3 months ago

I agree @SudMav -- feels like the market is being overly harsh here.

Some expectation for further (albeit modest) contraction in the underlying EBITDA margin, sluggish expected growth in managed services for FY25, outlook for lower large jackpots (40-45 compared to 55 last year), higher marketing costs.

None of which seem to justify a 10% fall, imo, but just suggesting some possible explanations.

they are on 19x EPS (excluding amortisation of acquired intangibles -- which is a non-cash cost) which isnt terrible for a business that has a super strong balance sheet, a history of growth and which throws off a lot of cash.

20

Solvetheriddle
Added 3 months ago

@SudMav I am not an expert on JIN, but was on the call out of interest. the main issues appear to be, 1. cycling a huge year on jackpots, 2. the Canadian acquisition has had to be re-engineered, and there was a comment you get what you pay for, ie they bought a cheap company with issues that need to be sorted, also they indicated more M&A coming. 3. there were some issues in the guidance that looked a bit light, eg third party saas growth. so a mixed bag.

i have no view on the valuation

18

mikebrisy
Added 3 months ago

@Solvetheriddle "2. the Canadian acquisition has had to be re-engineered, and there was a comment you get what you pay for, ie they bought a cheap company with issues that need to be sorted, also they indicated more M&A coming."

Great point. I wonder whether MIke's walking away from the latest UK acquisition when the price went up demonstrates some learning that you don't always know what you're getting, and therefore making some allowance for "remediation" in valuing the deals?

All acquisitions carry this risk (unless you have deep inside knowledge, e.g., through a pre-existing strategic relationship), so I tend to mark management up when they say they walked away from a deal because they couldn't agee on the price. This is where it helps to have highly aligned management, as opposed to "professional managers" with the wrong incentives like revenue, EBITDA or earnings growth.

14

Mujo
Added 3 months ago

Also only about 9% of revenue so if that’s what caused the sell off - haven’t had time to listen to the call - then very much overkill to be down this much.

12

mikebrisy
Added 3 months ago

My valuation range is $14.50 - $18.50, and I told myself I'd have a hard look at it if it fell below $14.00,

So I'm adding 25% to my RL position with a limit order at $13.70.... which I think will clear.

13

Karmast
Added 3 months ago

I suspect it's because they basically guided for a flat year in FY25, based on a forecast for fewer Jackpots in Australia and some resetting in Canada. They should be expecting that given the big jackpot year in FY24. This cyclicality of jackpots is completely normal over the longer term for Jumbo who more importantly keep growing market share. The savage sell off today seems like a good example of how Mr Market seems to only have a 6 to 12 month view most of the time!

Happy to take advantage of that and add more of this high quality compounder to my portfolio.

11

SudMav
Added 3 months ago

I just had a listen to the presentation where the CFO suggested that TTV could be lessened by approx. 30m by the normalisation back to the regular jackpot levels.

Some in-house development work is being done for Canadian to improve the business (which was expected) as they wanted to get into the market. In the call they talked about some pain now for some benefits in the future, so hopefully this means there will be some margin improvement in the future from this activity.

Still some potential M&A opportunities in the UK over the horizon as well, so still some potential upside if they can bring improved technology offerings and some ongoing revenue.

Taking a long term approach, I am still bullish on this opportunity and think they still have a great platform to grow the business going forward by growth and mergers. Took the opportunity today to up my stake IRL to take advantage of the price and nearly 2% dividend payout.

13
mikebrisy
Added 3 months ago

@Mujo FY24 was a good year for lottery jackpots - I know because my wife acts as my "market tracker" - she always buys a ticket when the Powerball jackpot goes over $30m, and flicks me a text. Saves me having to do research between results calls. :-)

Disc: Held in Rl and SM



17