@edgescape I agree. I don’t see $IPG as a roll up. Most of the acquisitions have been about building capability. E.g., the small WA hazardous area design team, to bring the capability to the East Coast and complement some of the product range, and O&M services. That was very strategic, and makes total sense given the business strategy.
I think CMI is potentially one where you could ask the rollup question. However, even here, the product range is clearly complementary although what I don’t know is how much of the value can be ascribed to that component of the deal. In any event, it was acquired for a superb price and, on its own, should drive a good FY25 and FY26 set of comparisons.
At this stage, I have no concerns that $IPG is a rollup. I am interested to see what kind of organic revenue growth it can achieve because my thesis is that it is positioned to benefit long term from the "electrification of everything". If some well thought through M&A gives it a bigger set of sails to ride those tailwinds, then I’m all for it, and happy to have got on the bus at this relatively late stage.
Disc: Held in RL and SM.