Yesterday I attended the $BRG 1H FY23 results call. In this straw I outline,
- Their reported highlights
- My analysis
- The Market Response
- My Conclusion
Their Reported Highlights
· Sustained EBIT growth of 7.6% against dynamic backdrop
· Record sales half with revenue growing 1.1% and relative geographic Theatre performances in line with expectations – Americas solid growth, APAC steady, and EMEA volatile
· Gross margins well managed and strengthening, despite inflationary pressures and exchange rate volatility
· Operating expenses well controlled and aligned with sales growth
· NPAT and EPS growth tracking overall sales growth after absorption of increased finance costs
· Increase in net debt a function of inventory planning process and the Lelit purchase
· Healthy cash inflow is forecast for 2H23 as receivables are collected and a more predictable supply chain allows a return to a more normal inventory flow model
· ROE return reflects the impact of the Lelit acquisition
· Interim dividend of 15.0c cents per share (100% franked)
CEO Jim Clayton said:
“A solid half of performance for the Group, delivering 7.6% EBIT growth against a challenging and dynamic backdrop. The strength of our product portfolio, coupled with the maturity and agility of our underlying Acceleration Platform, cut through the macro-economic headwinds of the 1H23.
We grew Gross Profit by tacking into our areas of strength: we managed price to counter material input and logistics cost inflation as well as negative currency swings; we leaned on our geographic diversification to deflect the impact of EMEA retailers buying much less than they were selling; we aligned our supply chain and go-to-market to take advantage of the trending tailwinds of "air frying" and “café quality coffee at home”; we executed a much improved new product launch process that accelerated revenue; and, we captured the benefit from the investments we’ve made in our digital execution and geographic expansion.
With Gross Profit growing 3.8%, we then grew EBIT by 7.6%. Over the last 8 years, we have typically, and intentionally, grown revenue faster than EBIT, giving the business model a forward tilt. In the 1H23, as we knocked back the macro-headwinds and retailer purchasing behaviour, we adjusted the business model dials to grow EBIT more quickly than revenue, all while continuing to progress the Acceleration Platform for the years ahead.
I was again impressed by the coordination and alignment across the Breville|Sage team to execute all of this simultaneously. Given the facts on the ground, it was a half well played”.
My Analysis
There was a lot to take in with this result and it shows, yet again, how you have to read through COVID-19 by understanding the trends in the run up to the pandemic, the early phase, the later phase, and then what that means going forward in the context of 1-2 years of higher interest rates crimping consumer demand, particularly for premium $BRG products in a slowing discretionary market.
Revenue and Margins
I was struck by the differences across the three regions: the strength of Americas, the weakness of EMEA, (driven by Europe) with APAC in between. In constant currency terms, America growth of 11.9% more than offset EMEA decline of -19.6%, with APAC flat. Americas (driven by USA) was ahead of retail market sales growth contrasted with Europe materially behind a flatter Europe retail sales growth.
So, why the difference? Jim Clayton observed that although EMEA sales to end customers (“sell out”) was flat, the retailers have run inventories down (thereby reducing “sell-in”), presumably in anticipation of a slowdown and to avoid a lot of working capital. Jim believes that EMEA retailer inventories are now so lean that, even if end customers slow down a little, restocking will be required.
The fact that overall revenue was flat at +1%, show the benefits of $BRGs expanding global footprint.
Of course, the flat sales figures conceal two other significant factors going on beneath the surface, and these were not quantified, so I've tried to back them out.
First, sales include 5 months contribution from the Lelit acquisition. While sales of Lelit have not been disclosed, it was acquired for Eur113 (c. A$170m). So, assuming acquisition at 2 x sales and 5 months’ worth in the result, then the acquisition contributed c. $35m in sales to this half. Second, the “Distribution Segment” declined materially due to disruption to Nespresso units sourced from Ukraine. The decline in the distribution segment of about $28m almost offsets the uplift from Lelit. So, swings and roundabouts.
Despite the flat sales story, $BRG increased prices and so EBIT grew by 7.6%, with %GM expanding to 35.1% from 34.1% in PCP. EBITDA grew by 13.1%. That is an impressive performance indicating that $BRG was able to more than pass on cost increases to customers without impacting sales value.
Inventory
Inventory was a major point of discussion at the FY22 results. $BRG built inventory during FY22 from typically $205-300m to almost $460m, a significant hit to Free Cash Flow. At 30 December, inventory was $465m, so the elevated levels have been maintained but have stabilised. Jim explained that this has been a purposeful strategy, maintaining “just in case” levels against supply chain disruptions. As a result, $BRG has not been impacted significantly by the recent COVID disruptions in China.
Jim indicated that with supply chains normalising and supply chain costs falling, he sees inventories slowly being released to their standard “flow model”. What this means is that if $BRG can hold on to their price increases and market shares, then there is the potential for future margin expansion over H2 FY23.
This will also help the cashflow situation. With the inventory build and Lelit acquisition, net cash has moved to a net debt position of $212m.
The increase in equity to acquire Lelit and sluggish profit growth means that ROE has fallen from 19.7% to 16.1%.
What does it all mean?
With all these moving parts, it is impossible to see the big picture in a 6m PCP comparison. So I have plotted below the last 10 years progression of revenue, operating profit, operating margin and net margin. It tells an interesting story.
Figure 1: $BRG
Source: Morningstar
Pre-pandemic, $BRG drove product range innovation expansion, market entry and bolt-on acquisitions to strongly drive revenue, holding operating margins in the range 11-13% and net margins around 8-9%. Through COVID, they’ve used the inventory build to take market share at a time when customers were buying more goods than services (coffee machines, air fryers etc.).
Expanded inventory, while also maintaining product innovation and new market entry (most recently South Korea and Mexico), put pressure on margins. With plans to now run inventory down as they return to their standard model and having been able to pass on price increases - to what extent will the gains from margin expansion offset the potential of falling volumes, as customers become more price sensitive on discretionary items in a recession?
Having guided to a FY23 EBIT of $165-172m, if we take the midpoint of $168.5m, then assuming a combination of falling input costs and inventory runoff means that we see operating margins return to between 11.5% and 12.0%, that would mean full year revenue (not targeted!) is expected to be in the range of $1400-1460m (compared with $1418m in FY22). Note: The market consensus (with some analyst updates included) have FY Revenue at $1478m and Operating Margin at 11.4%,
Unsurprisingly, this means that $BRG does expect overall flat sales from FY22 to FY23, which is not a surprise given the macro environment. What is encouraging is that price increases already delivered, inventory run-off, and controllable spend in sales and marketing and new product development, provides several levers that enable management to sustain earnings growth and dividend. Jim spoke about how these levers would be managed in H2 to maintain overall profit progression.
Product Launch 2.0
Jim often uses the results to showcase as aspect of the firm’s capabilities. This time, he highlighted the new product launch process: Launch v2.0.
This is a completely new approach to bringing a new product to market. Historically, they would launch at a few outlets in a new country, progressively adding more, building to peak sales over two years. The new approach involves a more focused and compressed inventory build ahead of a country launch, so that there can be a country-wide launch-day, accessible to all outlets, concentrating marketing spend.
The recent launch of Barista Express Impress shown in the presentation compared to the earlier model launched by Launch v 1.0 are dramatic (Figure 2 below) . 60 Weeks from launch Launch V2.0 achieves 2.4x weekly sales, with materially more accumulated sales (difference in area between the two curves). If this is repeatable, then it will lead to a material increase in $BRG’s ability to drive revenue growth and sales and marketing efficiency from new product launches.
Figure 2: Launch V2.0
Source: $BRG Investor Presentation (slide 17)
Where is $BRG headed.
Longer term, Jim sees a return to expanded margins and strong revenue and earnings growth. He argued in the presentation, that COVID has provided a three-year boost, from which he expects to return to the long term trend, enabled by the enhanced launch program. (Figure 3)
Can $BRG achieve that? Who knows. But this is a management team that has competently navigated the impact of COVID on its global markets and complex global supply chains. So I give them the benefit of any doubt.
Figure 3
Source: $BRG Investor Presentation (slide 7)
Market Response
In the two days following the results, SP dropped 9% - partly based on flat sales (a miss) and offset by the better-than-expected gross profit margin. The EMEA hit was a surprise. Today, given the bumper US retail sales results for January, we’ve seen a recovery, so that over three days the SP is off by 2%. Such is the noise of Mr Market.
Overall, brokers have marked $BRG TP down by c. 5%. Part of that, I expect, are their macro-views washing through that - over the last 6 months - probabilities of a recession have increased, particularly for USA.
Figure 4: Broker Response
Source: Broker Reports; FNArena.com
My Conclusion
Overall, this was a good result. Top line sales were a miss to market expectations, but strong margin performance in my view offsets this, and was a beat at the "GM%" level.
$BRG is clearly exposed to the impact of a consumer slow down. But in valuing the company, I prefer to think about the longer term. Thinking beyond a mild recession in FY23 and FY24, the investment thesis for $BRG relies on a belief that they can continue to be at the forefront of kitchen appliance innovation, growing the brand strength in existing markets and leveraging their global supply chain management model to enter new markets, bolting-on selected acquisitions to strengthen the product offering in targeted categories.
Management have navigated the pandemic well, particularly the supply chain disruptions of the last 1-2 years.
In valuation terms, the FY23 forward P/E of 27 is not challenging for a company that clearly aims to return to its strongly historical sales and earnings trajectory. With today’s SP at $21.35 I view $BRG at fair value. Should it be able to navigate the upcoming slowdown and re-establish strong growth, then there is a lot of opportunity for an upside to this.
$BRG is a Hold for me. At 2.7% of my RL portfolio, it is on my list to add either 1) in the event of a significant SP pull-back or 2) if there is evidence of a soft-landing in the macro. Should there be a serious consumer slowdown over the next 12 months, I have no doubt that $BRG SP will fall. However, my response to that situation will be to increase my holding, given my long term view.
Disc: Held in RL