Straws are discrete research notes that relate to a particular aspect of the company. Grouped under #hashtags, they are ranked by votes.
A good Straw offers a clear and concise perspective on the company and its prospects.
Please visit the forums tab for general discussion.
22/4/22 - Mistake made, lesson hopefully learned
Made a really bad call here and went against the grain with the market. My assumption was that their sales would consistently grow with the backing of H&H. However, I realised that the company is devoting a lot of resources to research and not enough for sales.
I wish the company the best and hope they find more breakthroughs in medicinal cannabis but unfortunately, the attention is taken away from growing sales.
In terms of valuation, current prices are justified as we did not see medium to high double-digit growth in revenues.
1/7/21 The fundamentals moving one way while the share price moving the other way. I have decided to double down. My previous valuation was a base case assumption. The team at Bod are expanding internationally and growing double digit quarterly and growing triple digit annually. I maintain my valuation. If today's strawman order is executed, it would be my third largest weighting in the portfolio. So I am taking a big risk and making a big call here. I could be wrong but the valuation is tempting at these levels 5/11/20 A really interesting company that sells both medicinal cannabis products for clinical trials / Healthcare Professionals and CBD/ Hemp for consumers using H&H Group as the global distributor. The consumer hemp products are branded under the Swisse label which has proven to increase sales at pharmacies. In terms of valuation these are my assumptions: - Revenue Growth - I am being optimistic and giving them a 64% CAGR in revenue growth for the next 5 years. That means revenues I predict grow from $6M to $65M. This is 10x sales assuming upcoming tailwinds such as regulators allowing medicinal Cannabis to be sold. Also, the H&H distribution deal allows Bod Australia to spend little on marketing and allow their partner to sell the product. It is also worth noting that H&H Group invested $5.5M to acquired 17% of the company, so they have a vested interest to scale Bod's hemp products. - I am going to be very conservative and assume operating margins to be 10% in 3 years time. I expect that operating costs to flatten in the coming years while revenues are growing. In saying that, I am not predicting that Bod achieve pricing leverage as more hemp products from other competitors would enter the market. Hence, I am sticking with 10% which is being optimistic, to say the least. - Reinvestment using sales to cap be close 1. I gave little reinvestment leverage with 1.2 as the excess cash would flow to R&D where new products take time to commercialise. Hence, this is line with my operating margin story where the company will grow but will reinvest their revenues to grow further. - I gave the initial risk of 6.7% assuming risk goes down to 4.5% as revenues grow. The equity risk premium was 6% as half revenue currently comes from the UK and Aus. Beta came to 1.2 as the company is small-cap and is generally riskier. There is a lot of catalysts for the business, especially; - Entering new markets - they have plans for broader Europe expansion to the United States, Netherlands, France and Italy. - Positive outcomes from clinical trials - They have an interesting trial going on in the UK called project 21 to measure outcomes from patients using medicinal cannabis. They are the only Australian company selected for the trial. The potential catalyst could be having more doctors in Europe prescribing Bod products. What I mean by clinical trial is that they are not waiting for CE mark but it is a study targeting 20,000 patients in the EU to see if medicinal cannabis products improved health outcomes. - Potential acquisition from H&H in the distant future if sales grow in excess of 100% each year. This is a genuine possibility as seen by the recent intention to own 17% of the company.
Three-part questionnaire for the investment rationale:
Part 1 - The business
Part 2 - Red flag city scenarios
Part 3 - Financials
Thoughts
Like I said it is very risky but the valuation is tempting and the product does sell well which is good. The financials do not show major red flags although cash outflow & I feel there is not enough cash. It all depends if they can win back revenue from the UK. We saw a sharp decline from $2M to $0.8M due to the lockdown.
Not a lot of research done for this microcap company. I remember there was a time with persistent cannabis booms and bust. However, now I feel we are approaching an inflextion point in the adoption curve where the winners start making money. I would not classify Bod to be a winner with only $7M in revenue for FY21. However, the capability for the canabis market to grow is only restricted by regulation. We are seeing a lot of companies going past the phase 1 trials.
So why am I maintaining a bull thesis? To me, Bod is an investible canabis company. It's actually not that hard to value on a traditional sense. You split the business in 2 segments (Medicinal Cannabis & CBD Wellness). Slightly more than half the revenue is coming from CBD Wellness division (thanks to the involvement with H&H Group).
Normal canabis companies try to commercialise cures and have to go through the clinical trials. Bod reached commercialisation of the medicinal canabis division 2 years ago through Medicalibis. You can see the seismic growth during FY20 - FY21 where they grew from 4,000 sales to 12,000 sales. The 12,000 sales correspond to $2.3M so from a unit economics it is roughly $200 per product. Next task is to look at the gross margins. Unfortunately COGS is blended at $3.9M so we don't know the mix. The good news is that COGS remained stable YoY.
Just to show how complex finding good companies in the canabis/hemp sector read this. According to Business News Australia, these were the 20 best cannabis companies. If you look at the list, 4 of them commercialised the rest are still in clinical trials.
Why I went with Bod over the others?
Who is running the show?
Why I remain bullish
Major risks
Invest at your perill is the best summary :)
Having done the work I am ok to take a position into the company. For those who struggle to read warning labels, Bod is still a high risk investment. I maybe wrong let's see in a few years.
Bod secures first binding purchase order for US market
i Report: Hemp Industry Daily: How to navigate the complicated world of CBD in retail - 2020
DISC: I hold
Leading medical advisory board established to capitalise on TGA decision to reschedule cannabis
? Members include Academic Director of the Lambert Initiative Prof. Iain McGregor, Head of Neurology at Gold Coast University Hospital Assoc. Prof. Arman Sabet, Dean of Sydney Pharmacy School Prof. Andrew McLachlan AM and ex Cancer Council CEO Prof. Ian Olver AM
? Board appointment coincides with the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s decision dated 15 December 2020 to down schedule CBD products to Scheduled 3 (pharmacist only) medicines
? Decision allows for low dose cannabidiol (CBD) products containing up to 150mg/day to be sold over-the-counter to consumers without a prescription
? Development broadens Bod’s addressable market and will assist with CBD product uptake across Australia ? Board’s immediate focus will be to review and evaluate the product registration pathways
LGP has also put out an announcement this morning re TGA decision to reschedule cannabis.
Disc : I have small holdings in both