BWN Valuation Analysis
I’ve been digging into Bhagwan Marine’s H1 2025 results and thought I’d share my valuation work for discussion. Always keen to hear where others think I might be wrong.
Current Position:
• Share Price: $0.585
• Market Cap: $161m
• H1 Revenue: $154m
• H1 EBITDA: $26.6m
• Operating Cash Flow: $21m
• NTA per share: $0.52
Valuation Approach 1: Asset base floor
Current price is 112% of NTA. Even at a conservative 80% of NTA for liquidation scenario, you get AU$0.42 downside protection from the vessel fleet.
Valuation Approach 2: Earnings Power (Margin-sensitive scenarios)
I’ve played with some different margins on the H1 annualised revenue base ($308m):
Bear Case (15% margin)
- EBITDA: $46m
- NPAT: $15m
- EPS: 5.5c
- At 12× P/E - $0.66
- At 15× P/E - $0.83
Base Case (18% margin)
- EBITDA: $55m
- NPAT: $18m
- EPS: 6.6c
- At 12× P/E - $0.79
- At 15× P/E - $0.99
Bull Case (20% margin)
- EBITDA: $62m
- NPAT: $21m
- EPS: 7.6c
- At 12× P/E - $0.91
- At 15× P/E - $1.14
Valuation Approach 3: Free Cash Flow DCF
This one’s based on actual H1 cash flows - $21m operating minus $17.7m capex. Projecting forward with conservative 1-2% revenue growth but margin expansion to 20% EBITDA:
• Bear case (12% WACC): $0.94
• Base case (10% WACC): $1.24
Valuation Approach 4: Peer Comparison
Using MMA Offshore (ASX: MRM):
- EV/EBITDA: ~16.7x
- P/E: 9.8× trailing and around 9.75x
Implication for BWN:
- At BWN’s bear-case NPAT ($15 m) and assuming similar P/E - fair value $0.55–0.65.
- At base-case NPAT ($18 m) - fair value $0.70–0.90.
- If BWN achieved MMA’s EV/EBITDA multiple on similar EBITDA ($55–60m annualised), implied EV could be $900m+, suggesting value above $1/share.
Fair value range seems to be $0.80-1.20 across methods. Even the conservative scenario suggests decent upside from current levels.
Is the 26% CAGR earnings profile realistic given project lags and competition, or is it more appropriate to model a steadier 10–15% CAGR with higher reinvestment needs, which would still support $0.80–1.00/share fair value?
Risks:
Marine services can be cyclical, the margin expansion story needs to actually happen, and fleet replacement will eventually require significant capex. Small cap liquidity is always a consideration too.
Another question is whether the decommissioning tailwind is as sustainable as management claims it will be.