Top member reports
No meetings
Consensus community valuation
XXXXXX
Average Intrinsic Value
XXXXXX
Undervalued by
The consensus valuation is for members only and has been removed from this chart. Click for membership options.
Contributing Members
Content is delayed by one month. Upgrade your membership to unlock all content. Click for membership options.
Valuation of $0.900
Added 3 months ago

BWN Valuation Analysis

I’ve been digging into Bhagwan Marine’s H1 2025 results and thought I’d share my valuation work for discussion. Always keen to hear where others think I might be wrong.

Current Position:

• Share Price: $0.585

• Market Cap: $161m

• H1 Revenue: $154m

• H1 EBITDA: $26.6m

• Operating Cash Flow: $21m

• NTA per share: $0.52

Valuation Approach 1: Asset base floor

Current price is 112% of NTA. Even at a conservative 80% of NTA for liquidation scenario, you get AU$0.42 downside protection from the vessel fleet.


Valuation Approach 2: Earnings Power (Margin-sensitive scenarios)

I’ve played with some different margins on the H1 annualised revenue base ($308m):

Bear Case (15% margin)

  • EBITDA: $46m
  • NPAT: $15m
  • EPS: 5.5c
  • At 12× P/E - $0.66
  • At 15× P/E - $0.83


Base Case (18% margin)

  • EBITDA: $55m
  • NPAT: $18m
  • EPS: 6.6c
  • At 12× P/E - $0.79
  • At 15× P/E - $0.99


Bull Case (20% margin)

  • EBITDA: $62m
  • NPAT: $21m
  • EPS: 7.6c
  • At 12× P/E - $0.91
  • At 15× P/E - $1.14


Valuation Approach 3: Free Cash Flow DCF

This one’s based on actual H1 cash flows - $21m operating minus $17.7m capex. Projecting forward with conservative 1-2% revenue growth but margin expansion to 20% EBITDA:

• Bear case (12% WACC): $0.94

• Base case (10% WACC): $1.24


Valuation Approach 4: Peer Comparison

Using MMA Offshore (ASX: MRM):

  • EV/EBITDA: ~16.7x
  • P/E: 9.8× trailing and around 9.75x  


Implication for BWN:

  • At BWN’s bear-case NPAT ($15 m) and assuming similar P/E - fair value $0.55–0.65.
  • At base-case NPAT ($18 m) - fair value $0.70–0.90.
  • If BWN achieved MMA’s EV/EBITDA multiple on similar EBITDA ($55–60m annualised), implied EV could be $900m+, suggesting value above $1/share.


Fair value range seems to be $0.80-1.20 across methods. Even the conservative scenario suggests decent upside from current levels.

Is the 26% CAGR earnings profile realistic given project lags and competition, or is it more appropriate to model a steadier 10–15% CAGR with higher reinvestment needs, which would still support $0.80–1.00/share fair value?


Risks:

Marine services can be cyclical, the margin expansion story needs to actually happen, and fleet replacement will eventually require significant capex. Small cap liquidity is always a consideration too.

Another question is whether the decommissioning tailwind is as sustainable as management claims it will be.

Read More