Top member reports
No meetings
Consensus community valuation
The consensus valuation is for members only and has been removed from this chart. Click for membership options.
Contributing Members
Content is delayed by one month. Upgrade your membership to unlock all content. Click for membership options.
Valuation of $0.780
stale
Added 9 months ago

Cash: $141m. ~Pipeline of new rides requires CAPEX spend of $50-60m. Thus, considering "available" cash in hand as of ~$90m for the purposes of the sum of the parts valuation.

Land: Estimating the valuation of the land at ~$110m (based on $200/sqm), which is similar to the estimate of Tyndall Asset Management.

As a comparison, in December 22, 2017, Village completed the sale and long-term leaseback of 154 hectares (381 acres) of freehold land on which its theme parks (Warner Bros. Movie World, Wet‘n’Wild Water World, Paradise Country, Australian Outback Spectacular, Village Roadshow Studios and Topgolf) are located, for A$100M ($65/sqm), taking on lease expense of $6.2M growing annually at 3%.

FY24e revenue growth of 6%

EBITDA Margin: 18% seems about right. This is lower than Ardent’s pre-2016 operating margin (~30%), but I am cautious about Ardent’s ability to return to such a high-margin operation in the short-medium term. Thus, on an FY24e top line of ~A$89m, at 18% EBITDA margins, the sustainable level of operating earnings is ~A$16m p.a.

EBITDA Multiple: Up to 11x EV/EBITDA seems reasonable.

As a comparison, in Dec 2018: Parques Reunidos (PQR SM) purchased Tropical Islands (Germany) for EUR 226M, 11.3x EBITDA of EUR 20M (28.2% EBITDA margin on EUR 71M sales) or 9.6x EBITDA excluding €28MM excess land value. With 1.2M annual visitors, Tropical Islands is comparable to Ardent Leisure’s theme parks with 1.1M annual visitors according to TEA 2019 report (see page 17)  

On these assumptions, bringing it all together on a sum of the parts (cash, land, and operating business) yields a $0.78 valuation.

Caveat: I don't think Ardent Leisure is a high quality business - it is CAPEX intensive, subject to economic fluctuations and doesn't have an overly strong economic moat (other than a somewhat iconic asset - Dreamworld). It is perhaps a trade at these levels for circa 50% upside if the operating business begins to increase earnings and/or commercialises the land.

Disclosure: Held on Strawman but not in real life.

Read More
#Trading update
stale
Added 10 months ago

The theme park business continues to recover, with revenues for the second half up 30% on the previous corresponding period. For the full year, revenue will be up 70% and up 25% from pre-covid levels.

236b0c21600397d867c82e61b3af7c9cd77620.png

Shares up 13% on the news (although coming off a multi-year low)

The business has loads of cash following the sale of Main Event -- about $141m. So while the market cap seems expensive relative to revenues ($213 vs $84, respectively), things look a lot better on an enterprise value basis (currently at $72m). They also own a lot of land.

Bear in mind that a good chunk of cash is flagged for future development. Also, this is a business that is very much dependent on discretionary spending. In fact, things have been moderating since the first half though, with management echoing the sentiment of others in the discretionary retail space:

accdeaf6a3b1c21ec97111bb6f67ecb6700a7c.png

As a high fixed cost business, profits can really move around a lot. In 2016 -- their peak for theme parks, and before the tragic accident at Dreamworld -- the EBITDA margin was a massive 33%. Ever since, even on an adjusted or normalised basis, it's been very uninspiring (usually negative from what i can see).

So this is a bit of a turnaround play. Can they get a good return on investment with their spend on Theme parks? Can they ride out any short-term economic headwinds? Probably, but it's too tricky for me.

Today's update is here.


Read More
#Bull Case
stale
Added 2 years ago

In response to the below straws I thought it'd be worth posting this (from the AFR today):

M&A arb funds run the ruler on Ardent Leisure’s sell down returns

May 23, 2022 – 10.55am

“What am I missing here?” asked the Barrenjoey sales traders after they were steered toward the Ardent Leisure share price, which closed last week at $1.24.

Ardent’s sale of its US business, Main Event, had just been given the all clear by antitrust regulators, and the share price would suggest the market’s ascribing almost no value to the company’s Dreamworld business, either as a going concern or in wind down.

On Monday morning, the stock was even lower at $1.23.

The trading has puzzled analysts, while putting it on the radar of opportunists and arbitrage funds.

To recap, Ardent (and fellow Main Event owner Red Bird Capital Partners) have secured $US835 million for their business from American trade player David &Buster. Ardent’s slice of the proceeds are $US487 million.

After anti-trust clearance, all that is remaining is the formality of the shareholder vote.

But that formality doesn’t appear to be reflected in the share price. The Main Event sale alone is set to net Ardent shareholders a 90¢ distribution and a 31¢ cash retention.

In other words, a $1.21 total return for each share looks on the cards.

The 2¢ residual is then effectively the residual value ascribed to the Dreamworld theme park.

Admittedly, Dreamworld has had its troubles, including a tragic accident in 2016and then a slump in ticket sales during the pandemic. But 3¢ does not computewith Dreamworld’s got 57 hectares of land.

Barrenjoey analyst Nick McGarrigle says the Dreamworld land alone is worth at least 23¢ a share while the business is probably worth 83¢ a share if a $40 million EBITDA can be achieved (based on a 10 times multiple).

The bottom line for arb funds is that Ardent Leisure costs $1.24 a share when on paper it could be worth $1.44 to $2, on conservative estimates.

So, like Barrenjoey asked, what are we missing here? Well it looks like either an easy and obvious trade, or a potentially interesting break up play.

Read More
#Bear Case
stale
Added 2 years ago

@Rhett - On a recent last minute family trip to the Gold Coast and Cairns we went to Dream World (Not our first visit). I was very disappointed in the choice and quality of rides and attractions available. I understand that a lot of revenue comes from the USA,.

Apart from Taipan, Giant Drop and Sky Voyager Ride , Not much else in my opinion. They are going to have to put some real effort in to keep up with the other parks,, especially SeaWorld, who have created Atlantis a new Island with rides.

I have to agree - Not sure what people are expecting moving forward.

Disc - Not held.

Read More