13-Feb-2020: Moelis Australia: ELMO SOFTWARE LTD (ELO): HOLD: Executing well across growth opportunity but trading at full valuation
Excerpts:
EVENT:
ELMO has reported its 1H20 results which were in line with expectations given ARR of $52m (+42.9% yoy) & Revenue of $23.6m (+30.3%) were prereported. EBITDA losses widened to -$2.6m (1H19: -$1.9m) with NPAT of $8.5m (+6.7% vs MOEe: -$9.1m).
Key operational metrics demonstrated strong execution across cross-selling into existing customers and selling the wider integrated, modular platform into new customers.
- ARPU $35.2k (+9.1% yoy)
- Customer revenue retention at 110%
- Average modules per customer of 2.6 vs 2.2 at Dec-18
- Average incoming modules per new customer at 3.9 vs 3.7 in 2H19
Acquisition of Vocam, HR & safety video e-learning content provider for $3.5m consideration, based on $1.5m revenue (2.3x EV/sales) and EBITDA neutral.
Guidance has been updated to include Vocam, with organic guidance unchanged. FY20 guidance now sits at ARR of $62.5m to $64.5m, Revenue of $53.3m to $55.3m and EBITDA of -$1.0m to -$3.0m.
IMPACT:
We raise our FY20/FY21/FY22 revenue estimates by 0.4%/2.8%/2.0% to $54.0m/$71.4m/$89.6m which primarily reflects the impact of the Vocam acquisition.
We also increase our EV/FY21e Sales multiple valuation to 7.0x from 6.5x which reflects a re-rating in peer multiples.
Our target price increases to $7.72 (prev: $7.42) as a result of the changes.
INVESTMENT VIEW:
We believe ELMO is executing well through cross-selling into existing customers and selling the selling the wider platform into new customers. While we like the ELMO story and believe there is a strong opportunity for the company to capitalise on its positioning as a cloud-based HR & Payroll software platform in the mid-market, ELMO is trading close to our fair value estimate at 7.2x EV/FY21e Sales given that FY21e organic revenue growth of 32% is being generated with an effective free cash flow margin of -30%.
Maintain Hold, $7.72 target price.
--------------------------------
Disclosure: I no longer hold ELO, as explained in a previous straw. Note that ELO is not yet profitable, with minus signs ("-") in front of important numbers such as their EBITDA and cash flow margin. This is a fairly standard business model - of reinvesting heavilly into the business (at the expense of early profits) to grow market share and relevance in the marketplace in the early years, and can be very successful (look at XRO for a great example of where the strategy worked very well), but if the company has strong competition (as Elmo does) and does NOT have strong and clear competitive advantages and differentiators over their competition (and Elmo MIGHT, but I fail to grasp those at this point), then expecting them to eventually become the leaders in their chosen space is probably more about faith and hope than research and logic. Xero (XRO) DID have clear competitive advantages and they were different. Their customers loved the software and found it easy to use. Even accountants loved it. It was at the forefront of the migration to the cloud with accounting, billing, etc., and this added to its rapid adoption - and ease of use, from any device, anywhere that has internet. All of Elmo's serious competition play in the same space - with pretty much the same advantages. They are all cloud-based SaaS companies, and many have a more complete set of modules than Elmo do (as I have mentioned in a previous straw). Elmo state that being Australian-based with their servers and data centre here in Australia is a competitive advantage when companies prefer to have their data stored locally rather than on the other side of the world, but Elmo is not alone there either. There are other small Australian companies (some are private - rather than listed) that do exactly the same thing with respect to local storage and servers. I'm not saying that Elmo will NOT be the eventual winners here - I'm just saying that I don't see much compelling evidence that suggests that they are the frontrunners to win the majority of the market share in their chosen space, and that is in stark contrast to a company like XRO - which ALWAYS looked like they were going to be the eventual winners. With XRO, it was the nosebleed valuations that usually kept me away. With ELO it's just that I don't see enough to make me a believer - yet.