Consensus community valuation
XXXXXX
Average Intrinsic Value
XXXXXX
Undervalued by
The consensus valuation is for members only and has been removed from this chart. Click for membership options.
Contributing Members
Content is delayed by one month. Upgrade your membership to unlock all content. Click for membership options.
#Spotlight Report
Added a month ago

Here's the final report on Nova Eye Medical following the completion of our first Stock Spotlight.

Click here

The document contains a link to an updated video summary, but you'll also find that on our Meetings page.

A huge thanks to everyone that participated.

NOTE: I'm considering taking a small position, both here and in real life. But will wait a week or so before doing so. And even then it will be <1% weighting as I'd like to see a bit more evidence of commercial traction. This is a high risk, high return type situation and (for me) makes the most sense as part of a bucket of asymmetric bets.

Read More
Valuation of $0.350
Added a month ago

This is my first post on Strawman, so please be gentle. As you can see from my Strawman portfolio, I am in a learning phase :)

Over the last couple of months, I have been building a workflow and toolchain to develop investment thesis documents I can understand and use.

I use a NotebookLM notebook per stock to collect data, facts, and opinions, and then use the Notebook as a BA to answer questions from my thesis Analyst, Claude AI. I do this to try to ensure that Claude does not have to compress the chat and lose context because it has too many documents and data loaded. If the thesis analyst needs some data gaps filled, it provides me with a prompt to enter into the Notebook, and I either get the answer or look for the data to get it. So I am the BA's assistant

Workflow is:

  1. Collect the data and load up the Notebook
  2. Run a data completeness check prompt that evaluates data coverage
  3. Run 4 prompts to get data on
  4. Structure, Financials & Contracts
  5. Management Statements, Strategy & Track Record
  6. Ownership, Governance & Alignment
  7. Analyst Views & Market Context
  8. Run the Claude prompt with a template to ensure a repeatable process and output. Typically 3 cycles in the prompt, sometimes more if I miss data
  9. No data for the first cycle
  10. Add 4 outputs from the Notebook next
  11. Add missing data if available to improve data coverage


I have a Claude Max Plan and Google AI Pro plan

The Transcript from this week's call filled a number of data gaps I had.


Keen to understand whether this is of value or whether I have confused my AI assistants and myself.

Summary

EYE is a pre-profit ASX micro-cap medtech with a differentiated surgical device (iTrack Advance) in the growing canaloplasty segment of glaucoma surgery. The company is on a clear trajectory toward profitability: 6 consecutive halves of US sales growth at ~40% CAGR, 70% gross margins, 75% spare manufacturing capacity (confirmed near-zero capex to scale), and group EBITDA breakeven guided for H2 FY26. At 1.4x EV/LTM revenue, the stock trades at a massive discount to every relevant peer. The Strawman CEO call (16 Feb 2026) strengthened the thesis by confirming: (1) US ASP ~$1,000+ with all stakeholders economically aligned, (2) capacity expansion is labour-only with no material capex, (3) VIA 360 competitor does not have a glaucoma indication, and (4) AlphaRET partner structure would be non-dilutive. The bear case is a cash crunch and dilutive raise if breakeven slips — the CEO's indirect answer on capital sufficiency means this remains the #1 risk. The probability-weighted EV of A$0.35 implies ~119% expected return from current levels.



The thesis doc is quite long but the valuation is based on scenarios as per below. I am happy to share the lot to test out my workflow but maybe better in the AI discussion.

1053cb2f91194c90cdbe79a6927709aa5a7bb5.png


Scenario Analysis

Bear Case 1 — "Cash Crunch & Dilution" (15%)

Sales growth decelerates to <15% in H2 FY26. Opex doesn't flex. Cash falls below A$2M → forced placement at ~A$0.10-0.12. Target: A$0.08-0.10.

CEO gave an indirect answer on capital sufficiency during the Strawman call — cited ASX formula compliance rather than expressing direct confidence. This remains the #1 thesis risk.

Bear Case 2 — "US Growth Stalls" (15%)

RPR peaks. New surgeon acquisition slows. Competitors respond. Revenue grows but margin leverage doesn't materialise. Target: A$0.12-0.14.

Reduced from 20% post Strawman call: VIA 360 confirmed not indicated for glaucoma; capacity expansion confirmed near-zero capex; reimbursement economics confirmed healthy for all stakeholders.

Bear Case 3 — "Reimbursement / Regulatory" (5%)

Medicare cuts reimbursement for canaloplasty; or EU MDR blocks European access. Target: A$0.06-0.10.

Reimbursement economics (doctor/facility/device) are healthy and aligned for all parties, which provides some political protection against cuts.

Base Case — "Execution on Guidance" (42%)

FY26 revenue A$35-36M. EBITDA breakeven H2 FY26. FY27 revenue ~A$45M at 25% growth. No capital raise required. Target: A$0.35-0.45 at 2.5-3.0x P/S.

Base case logic: EV at 2.75x A$45M = A$124M → ~A$0.44/share.

Bull Case 1 — "Profitability Inflection + Re-Rate" (17%)

FY27 revenue >A$50M. EBITDA A$5-8M positive. Analyst coverage expands. Target: A$0.55-0.75 at 3.5-4.5x.

Strengthened by confirmed near-zero capex scaling; AlphaRET non-dilutive structure; 7% US share = A$60M as management aspiration.

Bull Case 2 — "China Upside" (10%)

iTrack Advance drives US$5-10M annual in China (3.6M cataract surgeries/year TAM). Target: A$0.60-0.80.

Bull Case 3 — "Drug Delivery / M&A" (5%)

Licensing deal or takeover. At ~A$46M EV for A$32M revenue at 70% GM with 100+ patents — objectively cheap on a take-private basis. AlphaRET partner structure confirmed as subsidiary-level equity (non-dilutive to EYE shareholders). Target: A$0.80-1.50+ (speculative).


Data Gaps and open Questions

9fee0f40cb41c852e5d6fe1d12f2f9ea750892.png


Kill Switches (what breaks the thesis)

  1. Dilutive capital raise at >20% discount — placement below A$0.13 signals cash crisis
  2. US quarterly revenue turns negative YoY — core thesis is US growth
  3. Medicare reimbursement rate cut for canaloplasty — structural demand impairment
  4. MD or Exec Chairman sells on-market — insider signal of thesis failure


Read More
#AI Video Summary
Added a month ago

In prep for tonight's session on Nova Eye, I used Google Gemini's NotebookLM to create this 7 minute video summary.

This only uses material posted on Strawman and does not reference any external content, such as company reports, announcements or broker reports.

Of course, like most AI generated stuff, it's not perfect. But it does a reasonable job of capturing the general vibe of what members have said.

Let us know what you think.

Click the image to watch:

825149abfea75b60cd4b687ca48748fb502c42.png


Read More
Valuation of $0.280
Added a month ago

Ok, so this is super rough, but wanted to put a number out there prior to our meeting.

And it's hard to be anything other than rough given the wide range of potential outcomes. But if you assume some ongoing sales traction and largely effective scaling the following assumptions are hopefully not too heroic. (Probably way too conservative if you think they can execute well, but let's go with it)

I'm assuming they lift adoption, as well as the number of reps and efficiency of each rep to a point where they can grow revenue to $60m in FY2029. (Keeping FX rates unchanged).

I'll also grow the fix cost base to $38m, which accounts for a good bit of expansion, and an improvement in gross margins to 72% as they leverage the new Adelaide cleanroom and improve manufacturing yields, which would give them a PBT of $5.2m.

While they have substantial tax losses to claim, lets go with a standard tax rate to get NPAT of $3.6m just to make things easy. Lets also assume some growth in the share count to 325m to account for potential future capital needs or option exercises, which gives us an EPS of ~1.1c.

If these assumptions are remotely true, I think a PE of 35 is far from ambitious given the pace of revenue growth assumed, and size of the market.

When you plug all that in you get a FY2029 share price target of ~38c, or ~28c when discounted by 10% per annum for three years.

That said, playing around with various assumptions, all of which assume differing degrees of success, i can easily get anywhere between 15c and 50c! But the skew is very much to the upside given the current price of 16c

Read More
#CEO Interview
Added a month ago

The recording on the interview with Tom Spurling is now up (see members page), and you can access the transcript here: Nova Eye Transcript.pdf

I guess my initial takeaway is that this is a fairly clean thesis as far as med-tech goes. Nova Eye is post-commercialization with strong sales and revenue traction, albeit off a very small base, in its key US market. They have achieved a 40% CAGR over the last six halves while holding only a tiny percentage of the addressable market, which is around 3.5%. Tom noted they would be doing $60 million in revenue at 7% market share, a level he thinks they can capture in the medium term. There are also significant opportunities in other geographies, such as China where they have received clearance recently.

With the business apparently still on track for EBITDA breakeven this current half and no major CAPEX or cost increases evident, we should see strong growth in profits in the coming periods as 70% gross margins drop pretty much straight to the bottom line.

It is also nice that this is a relatively low-cost, quick turnaround surgical procedure without a huge price tag for the patient. There are plenty of potential patients given the high prevalence of glaucoma.

That said, the cash balance does not give them a lot of wiggle room, representing about seven to eight months of runway at the last half-year run rate. However, a working capital facility and recently reaffirmed guidance probably mean they will not need to raise cash. Tom gave the impression that profitability and cash flows were a major focus, even if that meant pursuing slightly slower growth than they could otherwise achieve.

Lastly, as has been noted by others, including Tom, the value of an established sales team that's generating good momentum and with a growing network of references is worth noting.

I have scheduled a call for us to talk through this business on Wednesday the 18th of February at 6pm AEDT. Keep an eye on your inbox or just check out the Meetings page. I am really keen to hear what others think, especially those who can emphasise some of the risks.

Read More
#Funnies
Added a month ago

Sadly, I will miss the $EYE SM meeting tomorrow.

Reason: Ophthalmologist appointment

But I’ve got my question in to Slido.

LOL, but honest.

Read More
#Worth keeping an EYE on?
Added 2 months ago

As I’m a bit over getting bullied by spec resources investors (*cough* @BkrDzn), I thought it might be worthwhile to filter out the gold price for a while and focus on an interesting microcap idea.

Like most microcaps that that have been listed for a while, Nova Eye Medical (EYE) comes with a rocky history. I won’t go too deeply into it given our friendly LLM junior analysts can do a pretty good job of summarising. But long story short EYE is the old Ellex Medical Lasers, who after selling their laser business to a French company in 2020, used the proceeds to fund the development and commercialisation of iTrack, a microcatheter used in canaloplasties of the eye to treat glaucoma. Messy history aside, EYE now appears to be a one product company and a much cleaner investment story.

The treatment of glaucoma is a big industry but is dominated by eye drops which make up 85-90% of the market. That said, minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) are growing, largely because a lot of patients are non-compliant with eye drops and glaucoma is a progressive disease where they eventually require surgical intervention. Improvements in MIGS technologies is also leading to many ophthalmologists to prefer surgical intervention sooner.

Within the smaller but growing MIGS segment the dominant solution is bypass stents to reduce the build-up of pressure in the eye. Stents have historically been 60-70% of the MIGS market, but with improvements in products and a preference for ophthalmologists to not leave hardware behind in the eye, canaloplasties are taking market share.

EYE’s original iTrack device had FDA approvals since 2008, but it wasn’t until the approval and commercialisation of the second generation iTrack Advance in 2023 where we started to see good sales traction, particularly in the US:

d4d94257453438d5720e94bf7c87dd9c094bb9.png

In the canaloplasty niche EYE effectively has just one competitor which is the Omni system produced by US based Sight Sciences. Fortunately, Sight Sciences is a listed business and we can track their glaucoma treatment segment over time and see how it compares to EYE:

613b07a6c04780e1bb18b3aa9e128da6e5dc01.png

Yes, it’s off a low base, but nonetheless it’s impressive to see EYE ~2x its revenue while Sight Sciences has largely been flat at the same time. It also supports EYE’s claim to be growing 3x faster than the broader glaucoma market.

But we know what the market has wanted from microcaps for quite some time and that is profitability (or a clear path towards it). On that front EYE management has guided to EBITDA breakeven in 2H26, though it is worth noting that in the past this is a business/management that has missed targets and ultimately disappointed investors. That said, they have done a decent job in recent years of maintaining cost control while revenue has grown. It’s noteworthy that administration/corporate costs have been steady/falling with modest increases coming from sales/R&D:

c161a044fc5c9d568bb4629ed1493a46868564.png

Assuming these cost trends continue and management land in the upper end of their guidance range, I think the target of EBITDA breakeven is achievable and would be a huge turnaround from the heavy operating losses of a couple of years ago:

d204fbf64d3048ebcc9903c6e73c4c7149b567.png

Of course, despite being an interesting idea EYE is not short of risks. While they have shown consistently strong execution in their US sales since the launch of iTrack Advance, they need to continually invest in sales and R&D to maintain an advantage over larger peers with more resources. Changes to reimbursement is also a risk, right now reimbursement is $542 for surgeons and $2,231 for facilities which is supportive for MIGS growth, but reimbursement rates can change.

Finally, liquidity risk is real. EYE is tracking toward EBITDA profitability, but there is ~$1m in cash costs below that line in capitalised R&D and leases. At September EYE had $4m cash in the bank and a $2m working capital facility. The line between current cash liquidity and sustainable free cashflow breakeven is a tightrope, not impossible but it will require continued sales execution towards the top end of current guidance.

Ultimately, I think EYE is at an interesting point from an investment lens. A product gaining traction in the lucrative US market with high gross margins that can lead to genuine operating profit leverage as revenue scales over modest sales/R&D cost growth. The risk as we approach this key inflection is if US sales can't maintain its >20% revenue growth rate given the balance sheet may not be able to support any hiccups. 

Would also love to get a view from the doyens of bio/medtech @mikebrisy and @Scoonieon this one!

Read More
#ASX Announcements FDA approval
stale
Last edited 3 years ago

Nova Eye pioneered the fastest growing segment in the burgeoning ophthalmic market; canal surgery for glaucoma, and holds over 100 patents in this domain

Nova Eye has invested in developing a next generation product (iTrackTM Advance)

The iTrack advance gained FDA approval of Friday 31 Mar. Shares jumped around 25% initially then pulled back for a 5% gain.

FDA approval

I notice there was some activity on strawman a few years ago. Perhaps some strawfolks are able to comment on these new developments;) With the original device still in use the new design should gain widespread adoption fairly soon and it will be interesting to hear progress on the rollout and uptake

b3fa5ea631783be338879abfac4cebeb977749.jpeg

Company presentation

492ba857d208a9cf0196f970fc0565c6fea64b.jpeg

Held SM and IRL

Read More
#Bear Case
stale
Added 5 years ago

Nova Eye Medical Limited (ASX: EYE) #bear case #excellent licence plate 

#best ticker code on the ASX

Thanks to Strawman and members @GnomeofZurich and @Bear77 I had a shallow dive in to Nova Eye. Although I love the ticker code I would be wary of the stock.

EYE looks like a day traders play thing. A quick 5 year ASX glance shows a stock with highs and promise of potential of $1.58 per share in 2016. A slow decline saw a drop to lows of 0.30c in July 2021. 

But wait…..

 

An exciting, heart pumping upswing currently to 0.42c per share.

 

Let’s dive deeper……

Founded 1985 Nova Eye has sales headquarters in Freemont California and Dunedin NZ. The company maintains 12% Board ownership (a plus but not huge).

 

What does Nova Eye Medical Ltd Do?

Manufacture, service and distribute medical equipment and devices to diagnose and treat eye disease. 

 

Company Numbers

 Market cap $61.3 M 

Shares on issue 144 Million

Trading volumes 120,000 – 250,000 share / day

Cash on Hand $17.8 M

EPS $0.256

NTA $0.18

Claims of TAM for products of US $5.9 Billion for glaucoma devices and approximately US $5.1 Billion for competition to age related macular degeneration (AMD) injections.

 

Revenue (shows slow growth)

$13.6 M 2021 up from 

$12.8 M 2020

Only 8% increase 

EBIT loss over the last year

Burnt through $15.5 M and made loss of $-4.4 M

 

Drum roll……I smell a capital raise in the next 12 months.

 

Debt but no Earnings

$3.7 M debt 2021  up from

$1.55 M debt in 2020

 

Cash on Hand 

$17.8 M  on hand 

Net cash position of $14.1 M (less liabilities of $4.69M and upcoming liability of $1.97M)

 

Long and short of it : losing money 

 

Recent Uptick

 

As far as I can tell recent share price spike as @GnomeofZurich rightly pointed-out is linked to announcement of an acquisition of a US portfolio of glaucoma device patents (August 2021).

 

EYE paid $2M plus $1.7M fully paid shares (under escrow for 12 month)

 

Business Offerings

 2 Streams of product revenue / future anticipated revenue

1)    Glaucoma medical devices

2)    AMD/ 2RT nanosecond laser 

 

Stream 1: Glaucoma treatment devices

Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide affects 300, 000 Australians 

And estimates suggest it affects between 60-130 million people world-wide. 

 

Stream 2: Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) specifically intermediate type treatment device.

(AMD) is the leading cause of blindness worldwide affecting 1.4 million Australians. Estimated 14% of Americans over 80 years. 

 

Let’s expand……

 

Glaucoma what NOVA EYE offers

 

Total Addressable Market (TAM) of US $5.9B for these devices

 

Recent patent purchase from US saw Molteno3 glaucoma drainage device coming into Nova Eyes product fold. 

 

Molteno3 is one of the most frequently used glaucoma drainage devices in the world. One of the “gold standards” for the treatment of advanced primary open angle glaucoma. A last resort treatment to save remaining sight.

 

Glaucoma is an irreversible blinding disease caused by optic nerve damage. This is slow and often asymptomatic until well advanced. Patients lose their peripheral vision slowly. 

Lay person terms:

•       You can think of the eye as a small pump

•       We produce fluid to keep the eye inflated so it can work,  just like we need air inside a car tyre

•       There is a primary drainage angle that sits like a 360 degree gutter in front of the colored part of the eye (the iris), in patients with glaucoma the eye produces more fluid than it can drain through this gutter leading to an outflow imbalance and eventual high intraocular backflow pressure that damages the optic nerve (the plug that connects the eyeball to the brain). 

•       Sometimes debris from inside the eye can build up in the drainage angle – think of the angle like a gutter on a roof, occasionally leaves can get caught in the gutter so fluid can’t drain away as easily

 

So what does the Molteno3 device do?

 

This surgically implanted device sits underneath the white of the eye (the conjunctiva) and part of it (a tube) sits inside the eye allowing the fluid inside the eye to bypass any compromised natural drainage tissue and exit the eye more easily. This lowers eye backflow pressure and stops damage to the delicate cables that run around the back of the eye.

 

This device has excellent long-term results in studies with up to 88% success rates for the past 20 years of use. It really does help to lower eye pressure and preserve vision. 

 

However it is a complex surgery and requires intensive follow because of risk of serious complications. 

 

So is this acquisition a BIG DEAL? …. Well YES and NO!

 

Molteno3 while a “gold standard” device has a great deal of competition. Think of the TAM being sliced like a pie and Molteno3 really is only a small and decreasing sliver.

 

Competition is steep in glaucoma device land

 

This is the kicker for me and my bear case for this revenue stream of Nova Eye. 

Molteno3 has a direct and equally effective competitor in the advanced glaucoma drainage space called the Baerveldt tube. 

 

Baerveldt glaucoma device is sold by Johnson and Johnson. Studies show that although surgeons take slightly longer to implant it (roughly 13 minutes longer) it is equally effective in patient outcomes. AKA lowering eye pressure and preserving sight. 

Other slivers of the glaucoma device pie

 SLT (selective laser trabeculoplasty)

 

Glaucoma device technology has improved significantly over the past decade. Glaucoma patients are frequently screened better in practice so disease is detected earlier.

 

Initial treatment alternatives are also really effective at preventing progression to advanced glaucoma and the need from drainage implants like Molteno3. 

 

The LIGHT study published in the LANCET in 2019 is a glaucoma treatment game changer. Patients with high pressure and glaucoma were found to benefit from an initial treatment of laser to this drainage angle as a first line treatment. This is instead of medicated drops. This can prevent disease progression. 

 

One hit of laser can last up to 5 years with a repeat possible, giving a possible 10 year eye pressure lowering cover. 

 

MIGS devices (minimally invasive glaucoma surgery)

 

MIGS are surgical implants but much easier for surgeons to place. They also work by helping the fluid or aqueous to flow out of the eye. Glaukos is one of the main companies producing this tech. Major devices include the Istent and Hydrus. These devices are inserted into the eye drainage tissue to help outflow. 

 

Increasingly popular these devices provide a 30% reduction in IOP. The benefits of these devices last at least 5 years and likely longer. Patients don’t progress as readily and don’t need major glaucoma drainage surgery. So the Molteno3 is hopefully going to be needed less in the future.

 

NOVA EYE and the ITrack (Other glaucoma device offerings)

 

Itrack is a patented MIGS offering by Nova Eye. It is a micro catheter implant that feeds 360 degree into the tube like drainage outflow channel (Schlemm’s canal). That gutter system we were talking about. This is new technology in the MIGS space. 

 

My concern is that there is limited data on efficacy. It also purports to lower eye pressure by 30%. Nova Eye claims that it doesn’t damage internal eye tissue like other MIGS devices do. This means that if glaucoma does get worse and further surgeries are needed there is more viable tissue to tap into to improve outflow pathways. 

 

Studies are small and I am dubious of the claims so far and suggest the surgery looks more difficult than the Istent or Hydrus due to the accuracy needed to feed the tube through.  

 

This tech doesn’t significantly increase aqueous fluid outflow compared to competitive market devices. 

 

There are early claims that the inside lining of the cornea (the endothelium) is preserved better but very limited evidence for this claim. I am failing to see a competitive advantage of this MIG device - yet. But happy to be proven wrong. 

 

The known unknowns

 

Pharmaceutical and device companies around the world are racing to develop the next latest greatest device. Protection of the eye cables in the retina with new therapies is a likely gamechanger in the future which may render outflow devices prehistoric.

 

Stream 2: AMD intermediate treatment device

 

Macular degeneration is an eye disorder that affects people over 50. There are 2 major types wet and dry macular degeneration. Both involve the progressive loss of central vision due to damage of the underlying retinal tissue. 

 

Wet AMD is treatable. Wet implies leaky new blood vessels that develop in the retinal tissues. Eye injections are used to improve and maintain central vision. Injections include Eyelea and Avastin. Once diagnosed with wet AMD a patient is on a regime of injections spaced every 6 to 12 weeks for the rest of their lives. Or until they no longer experience a sight benefit. 

 

Eye injection drug technology is a very hot game with the likes of Australian companies such as OPTHEA (OPT) in this space. The goal is to find a treatment that works effectively and allows for fewer and fewer injections. 

 

Wet AMD is a veritable gold mine. Most Ophthalmologists charge around $312 ++ per injection and the Medicare rebate is around $266 from the government. This is per injection. Every time. 

 

Currently there is no effective treatment for dry AMD. 

 

Let’s find out about the 2RT laser

 

The second major product offering from Nova Eye is a world first nanosecond laser therapy 2RT for macular degeneration. This product plays in the AMD space. 

 

The laser treatment is only effective on intermediate type macular degenerative changes. The laser is pulsed for a tiny duration to prevent damage and heating of surrounding tissue. The pulse is purported to have regenerative cell properties. 

 

2RT is cleared for use in Europe and Australia but is still waiting on FDA approval. 

 

The laser is meant to stop dry intermediate AMD from converting to wet AMD or at least delaying the change. This reduces the number of injections needed. 

 

Nova Eye reports success of the 2RT laser tech based on the LEAD study (a randomized controlled trial). People have raised concern about this study. The extent of success and reduction of progression of wet AMD was based on post hoc analysis removing a certain population type of people from the study results. 

 

I am always wary of post hoc statistical reporting. Oh! Those weren’t the results I wanted…… wait……if I remove these people or that group suddenly things are way more rosey.

 

The reality is that a whole group of patient’s didn’t show the same benefit from the laser if they had a certain type of macular tissue deposit at a certain depth. 

 

I am currently unaware of any colleagues using the 2RT technology for treatment of AMD. 

 

I would personally wait for FDA approval of the 2RT, further uptake of this method and repeated studies delineating patients into class of AMD before getting too excited. 

 

Summary

·      Cool Ticker coder 

·      Loss making company

·      Slow growth

·      Debt increasing

·      High cash burn

·      Need for upcoming capital injection 

·      I feel recent purchase US glaucoma patent portfolio isn’t spectacular

·      2RT tech doesn’t have enough evidence based support for me to get too excited

·      I feel the company is overhyped based on recent acquisition

 

 

Read More
#Broker/Analyst Views
stale
Added 5 years ago

23-Dec-2020:  Ord Minnett:  Nova Eye Medical (EYE): Renewed iTrack sales growth points to a strong future

Analyst:  Dr DENNIS HULME, [email protected] +612 9377 1500  www.taylorcollison.com.au

  • Speculative Investment
  • Recommendation: Outperform
  • Market Capitalisation: $49M
  • Pro forma cash after capital return: $26.5m
  • Share price: $0.34
  • 52 week low: $0.285
  • 52 week high: $0.465
  • OM Valuation: $0.42/share

Nova Eye Medical (Nova) is focused on its high-growth glaucoma franchise following the sale of the Ellex laser and ultrasound business in June. The disposable iTrack catheter used in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has been a key driver of revenue growth, delivering a sales CAGR of 31.4% from FY15 to FY19. While iTrack sales faltered in FY20, it has returned to its growth path in recent months, with sales in the 4 months ending 31 October 2020 13% higher than the previous corresponding period. Nova has expanded its glaucoma product range with the acquisition in July of the highly regarded but under-promoted Molteno3 glaucoma drainage implant, which will benefit from Nova’s sales and marketing infrastructure. Nova will seek a partner to support further development of its 2RT laser for treating intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). It has a strong balance sheet, retaining $26.5m in cash from the sale of the laser and ultrasound business, so it is well positioned to capitalise on organic and inorganic growth opportunities. We initiate coverage with an Outperform recommendation and a valuation of $0.42/share.

--- click on the link above for the full report ---

Read More
Valuation of $0.750
stale
Added 7 years ago
Read More
Valuation of $1.000
stale
Added 8 years ago
Growth story masked by declining cataract products. Market has missed the growth potential. Market has not placed any value on 2RT technology.
Read More