A quick note to the Admins/Community: If posting personal portfolio transition strategies like this goes against the ethos or rules of Strawman, my sincere apologies—please feel free to delete this post!

Hi everyone, looking for a sanity check on a tactical move I'm planning for Monday.

The Context

I am currently transitioning my Super to a new SMSF. However, my current retail platform/trustee is dragging their feet, and I am currently in an AFCA dispute with them regarding highly opaque and seemingly incorrect CGT calculations.

The Risk

While I wait out this administrative and legal battle, my portfolio has a massive concentration risk: 17.5% of my total balance is sitting in FANG. I am sitting on a substantial profit in this position, but given the current macro environment (oil spikes, rate uncertainty, tech volatility), maintaining a 17.5% weighting in a highly volatile, 10-stock tech ETF feels way too risky—especially while I have zero control over my rollover timeline.

The Tactical Move (The "Bridge")

To solve both the market risk and the administrative problem, I am planning a surgical strike on Monday:

1. Sell FANG entirely: This removes my biggest concentration risk and locks in the profit. More importantly for my AFCA case, it creates a "realized" tax event, forcing the trustee to provide a clean, undeniable statutory CGT calculation rather than hiding behind "moving estimates."

2. Redeploy into a "Fortress" Split: Instead of sitting in cash, I plan to park this 17.5% sleeve of my portfolio into a 3-way ETF split that acts as a defensive bridge until my SMSF bank accounts are open and ready to receive the cash.

The Proposed Allocation (Redeploying the 17.5% sleeve):

• 40% Quality (QUAL or QLTY): Swapping US Tech hype for companies with high ROE and low debt to survive a "higher for longer" rate environment.

• 30% Ex-US (VEU): Hedging against the extreme concentration at the top of the US market.

• 30% Emerging Markets (WEMG): Securing a valuation discount and non-correlated growth while the US deals with inflation sticky-ness.

(Note: The rest of my portfolio includes some broad global index exposure, gold, and a few high-conviction Aussie pillars like SOL and WES, which I am leaving untouched for now to avoid messy tax parcels).

Questions for the Brains Trust:

1. Is there any structural flaw in this logic of using a 3-way ETF split as a "parking spot" to de-risk a concentrated tech position ahead of a rollover?

2. For the Quality allocation, does anyone have a strong preference between QUAL vs QLTY in the current macro environment?

Appreciate any thoughts or blind spots I might be missing!